Chiefs Anyone hear Bill Maas yesterday? - Page 2

Saccopoo · 10-11-2010, 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1

Kietzman & Petro must have been listening to him because they are agreeing with him.

****ing tards. If they just read the Chiefs Planet, they'd know our offensive line is completely solid and kicking ass. What the **** do people in sports know? Nothing apparently.

bobbything · 10-11-2010, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

****ing tards. If they just read the Chiefs Planet, they'd know our offensive line is completely solid and kicking ass. What the **** do people in sports know? Nothing apparently.

Neither of them were agreeing that the line sucked. In fact, Kietzman said today that he thought the line was playing well. And it is. It's not spectacular, but good enough to protect the least-sacked QB in the league (currently at 3 sacks, would have been 2 if Cassel hadn't Keystone Cop'd himself into a sack yesterday).

Point being, the line is less of a problem than a QB who is being paid $10+ mil per year to hand the ball off and not throw interceptions.

Saccopoo · 10-11-2010, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobbything

Neither of them were agreeing that the line sucked. In fact, Kietzman said today that he thought the line was playing well. And it is. It's not spectacular...

Bullshit. I was told certain players were "ascending" and "kicking ass."

Kicking ass is kicking ass. That's damn near the polar opposite of "not spectactular."

I mean, we could theorize about why they are having Cassel dink and dunk and sweeps and nifty little tricks and the like, but we all know that would be hypothetical blather as it's been stated here repeatedly that the o-line is "kicking ass."

bobbything · 10-11-2010, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Bullshit. I was told certain players were "ascending" and "kicking ass."

Kicking ass is kicking ass. That's damn near the polar opposite of "not spectactular."

I mean, we could theorize about why they are having Cassel dink and dunk and sweeps and nifty little tricks and the like, but we all know that would be hypothetical blather as it's been stated here repeatedly that the o-line is "kicking ass."

You sound bitter.

Fish · 10-11-2010, 04:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Bullshit. I was told certain players were "ascending" and "kicking ass."

Kicking ass is kicking ass. That's damn near the polar opposite of "not spectactular."

I mean, we could theorize about why they are having Cassel dink and dunk and sweeps and nifty little tricks and the like, but we all know that would be hypothetical blather as it's been stated here repeatedly that the o-line is "kicking ass."

This really isn't working out for you bub....

KCbroncoHATER · 10-11-2010, 02:05 PM

I agree with his point about the o-line, but I would call them average. We have gotten some breaks and had some running plays called at just the right time that makes it look better than it is. I am sure Bill would agree that some of it is on the running backs, they do the best with what they got to work with.

Just like Matt.

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-11-2010, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCbroncoHATER

I agree with his point about the o-line, but I would call them average. We have gotten some breaks and had some running plays called at just the right time that makes it look better than it is. I am sure Bill would agree that some of it is on the running backs, they do the best with what they got to work with.

Just like Matt.

Kill yourself

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-11-2010, 02:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD

Kill yourself

I'm 'Hamas' Jenkins, and I approve this message.

patteeu · 10-11-2010, 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCbroncoHATER

I agree with his point about the o-line, but I would call them average. We have gotten some breaks and had some running plays called at just the right time that makes it look better than it is. I am sure Bill would agree that some of it is on the running backs, they do the best with what they got to work with.

Just like Matt.

I don't share your love for LJ (at all), but I think there's some truth to the idea that the offensive line is probably around average and that the coaching is covering up for it to some extent. If they were really a good offensive line, we'd occasionally line up and power forward for a yard in short yardage situations, but they don't really ever do that. For example, last week on the 4th down play that they rushed into after first having their punt team in the game. On that play, they run a tricky sweep rather than just lining up and bulldozing some people.

KCbroncoHATER · 10-11-2010, 03:28 PM

It's true, just go back and watch the games you will see that they get big runs when the LBs are in pass coverage. When they need to get the hard yards they have to pass the ball or run it around the end. That's NOT and great running game, running it over your face is.

kcxiv · 10-11-2010, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCbroncoHATER

It's true, just go back and watch the games you will see that they get big runs when the LBs are in pass coverage. When they need to get the hard yards they have to pass the ball or run it around the end. That's NOT and great running game, running it over your face is.

except no linebackers are really in pass coverage because Matt ****ing Cassel is the qb. NO one is scared of him. so whydrop everyone back? makes no sense. Gameplan to beat the Chiefs is stop the run.

Have you seen our gameplan.Weiss doesnt even trust Cassel. If he did, he wouldnt have said, i need to fix the QB. he would have said, i need to make the offense better.

bobbything · 10-11-2010, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCbroncoHATER

That's NOT and great running game, running it over your face is.

I bet you think the forward pass is just a phase.

Saccopoo · 10-11-2010, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by patteeu

I don't share your love for LJ (at all), but I think there's some truth to the idea that the offensive line is probably around average and that the coaching is covering up for it to some extent. If they were really a good offensive line, we'd occasionally line up and power forward for a yard in short yardage situations, but they don't really ever do that. For example, last week on the 4th down play that they rushed into after first having their punt team in the game. On that play, they run a tricky sweep rather than just lining up and bulldozing some people.

Shut the **** up.

Kicking ass. The offensive line.

Kicking ass.

People don't know anything around here and never watch football. If they did, they'd know the offensive line is completely solid and is kicking ass.

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-11-2010, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

Shut the **** up.

Kicking ass. The offensive line.

Kicking ass.

People don't know anything around here and never watch football. If they did, they'd know the offensive line is completely solid and is kicking ass.

Dude, seriously. Just stop. Pretty much this ENTIRE board will tell you our line is playing well. How many times has Matt been sacked?

I'd be willing to bet these hacks on the air are talking shit to get listeners. Its what they do. You, however are just a moron and a drama queen.

Saccopoo · 10-11-2010, 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD

Dude, seriously. Just stop. Pretty much this ENTIRE board will tell you our line is playing well. How many times has Matt been sacked?

But yet it's funny to see that it's suddenly the O-line that deserves the credit for Cassel not getting sacked after they were responsible for getting him drilled 47 times last season.

It couldn't possibly be that the coaching staff is trying to get the ball out of his hands substantially quicker this season.

It couldn't be that Cassel is finally figuring out how to avoid sacks. (See sentence above.)

It couldn't be that they are utilizing quick slants, running sweeps, end runs, etc. to minimize QB pressure.

It's got to be that the offensive line has had an epiphany and went from super bad to kicking ass overnight.

Quote:

I'd be willing to bet these hacks on the air are talking shit to get listeners.

I'd be willing to bet that they've been in the business of looking at sports, analyzing sports and talking sports (and in the instance of Bill Maas, playing sports) and have a general understanding of what's going on.

Quote:

Its what they do.

Yeah, because a quarterback controversy wouldn't stir as much shit as saying that the coaching staff is putting in a lot of effort to mask shitty offensive line play.

Talking about the offensive line is much more controversial and fire branding than trying to pull in listeners with a "start Croyle" campaign. I mean, other than around here anyway.

Quote:

You, however are just a moron and a drama queen.

Yep. You are right and everyone else is wrong and a moron. Typical response from self-appointed, self-aggrandizing know it alls.

10-11-2010, 02:05 PM	#6
KCbroncoHATER KCBH Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Lee's Summit, Missiouri Casino cash: $9984900	I agree with his point about the o-line, but I would call them average. We have gotten some breaks and had some running plays called at just the right time that makes it look better than it is. I am sure Bill would agree that some of it is on the running backs, they do the best with what they got to work with. Just like Matt.
Posts: 1,326

10-11-2010, 03:28 PM	#10
KCbroncoHATER KCBH Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Lee's Summit, Missiouri Casino cash: $9984900	It's true, just go back and watch the games you will see that they get big runs when the LBs are in pass coverage. When they need to get the hard yards they have to pass the ball or run it around the end. That's NOT and great running game, running it over your face is.
Posts: 1,326