Who is the biggest goat?

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by KChiefs1

Cassel did not lose this game today!

Bowe makes that catch & it's game over......

But there were at least 10 other plays that could have been made that would have been "game over". That wasn't even the last one. To single out Bowe is just arbitrary.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by KChiefs1

Cassel did not lose this game today!

Bowe makes that catch & it's game over......

Cassel didnt do much to help win, though, did he?

Chiefs fans have gone so long without a good QB, its hard to tell when one is playing up to a level to win.

[DeezNutz]

If Bowe makes that catch, nothing else matters. .

Such a stupid game to play. Let's see:

1. If Studebaker doesn't hold, the Bowe drop doesn't matter.
2. If Cassel doesn't wet himself and throw off his back foot at the end of the first half, it's likely that the Bowe drop wouldn't have mattered.
3. And about 5 more "ifs."

[jbwm89]

But Bowe's catch would have ended the game at that moment. I am not talking about a play in the first half that would have given us points then, the game would have adjusted to those.

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by jbwm89

But Bowe's catch would have ended the game at that moment. I am not talking about a play in the first half that would have given us points then, the game would have adjusted to those.

We're talking about it because it was one of the last ones. And then when people mention the Flowers failed INT, people say, "But if Bowe had caught that ball!!!"

Can't have it both ways.

[jbwm89]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

We're talking about it because it was one of the last ones. And then when people mention the Flowers failed INT, people say, "But if Bowe had caught that ball!!!"

Can't have it both ways.

The flowers play is the same way. He catches that pick the game is over.

He knocks the pass down the game is not over.

I understand what your saying but you can't put something like a holding penalty in the first half, or an interception in the first half on the same level as those 2 plays

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by jbwm89

The flowers play is the same way. He catches that pick the game is over.

He knocks the pass down the game is not over.

I understand what your saying but you can't put something like a holding penalty in the first half, or an interception in the first half on the same level as those 2 plays

The holding penalty literally wiped out 3 points; it's bigger than the Bowe drop, so you're right that it's not on par.

[jbwm89]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

The holding penalty literally wiped out 3 points; it's bigger than the Bowe drop, so you're right that it's not on par.

The holding penalty doesn't happen and the entire game changes. We play differently and so do they. Bowe catches the pass and nothing either team can do changes anything, its over.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

If Bowe makes that catch, nothing else matters. .

Such a stupid game to play. Let's see:

1. If Studebaker doesn't hold, the Bowe drop doesn't matter.
2. If Cassel doesn't wet himself and throw off his back foot at the end of the first half, it's likely that the Bowe drop wouldn't have mattered.
3. And about 5 more "ifs."

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

We're talking about it because it was one of the last ones. And then when people mention the Flowers failed INT, people say, "But if Bowe had caught that ball!!!"

Can't have it both ways.

I get what you are saying, but...

If he catches that ball the time is able to click down to the 2 minute warning and given us the first down and the raiders had no timeouts.

It would have ended the game.

This is a multiple choice question.

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by jbwm89

But Bowe's catch would have ended the game at that moment. I am not talking about a play in the first half that would have given us points then, the game would have adjusted to those.

So would have Flowers interception. Or even if he had knocked the ball to the ground it would have limited the Raiders to one last sideline throw. Flowers is the goat, LETS CUT HIM!!!!!!

[DeezNutz]

Originally Posted by cdcox

So would have Flowers interception. Or even if he had knocked the ball to the ground it would have limited the Raiders to one last sideline throw. Flowers is the goat, LETS CUT HIM!!!!!!

But Flowers never would have aapopruepoa if a;lkrjea hadn't aoia;oriuapoeia!!!!111

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

But Flowers never would have aapopruepoa if a;lkrjea hadn't aoia;oriuapoeia!!!!111

Excellent point!!!!elevensies.

[jbwm89]

Originally Posted by cdcox

So would have Flowers interception. Or even if he had knocked the ball to the ground it would have limited the Raiders to one last sideline throw. Flowers is the goat, LETS CUT HIM!!!!!!

If Bowe catches that ball there is no need for Flowers to make that play. I don't think there is another play in the game before that one that you can say with 100% certainty ENDS THE GAME at that moment.

Plus the ****ing catch was routine, damn thing when straight through his hands.

[cdcox]

Originally Posted by jbwm89

If Bowe catches that ball there is no need for Flowers to make that play. I don't think there is another play in the game before that one that you can say with 100% certainty ENDS THE GAME at that moment.

Plus the ****ing catch was routine, damn thing when straight through his hands.

Look, it was a close game where we blew at least 10 plays. If we made half of them the game is a blow out. If we make 2 of them it is an easy win. If we make one of them it would have given us the margin of victory. But it's all Bowe's fault.

[jbwm89]

Originally Posted by cdcox

Look, it was a close game where we blew at least 10 plays. If we made half of them the game is a blow out. If we make 2 of them it is an easy win. If we make one of them it would have given us the margin of victory. But it's all Bowe's fault.

I never said it was all Bowe's fault, that would be stupid. But the title of this thread is Who is the biggest goat. I think in this situation it was Bowe for dropping that pass.