Football Did anyone catch that trick punt return by the Bears? - Page 2

**Bane** · 09-26-2011, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

If that is the hold they called, it was a ****ing horribly late thrown flag. The flag wasn't on the field until after Knox had the ball and started the return.

The pussification continues.

kstater · 09-26-2011, 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

If that is the hold they called, it was a ****ing horribly late thrown flag. The flag wasn't on the field until after Knox had the ball and started the return.

I'll post the screencap if you wish, but he reached for it at 1:05 and it left his hand at 1:04. Now if you think it's unreasonable for a ref to see a hold process it, and reach for his flag in less than 2.5-3 seconds, that's your opinion.

**chefsos** · 09-26-2011, 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

If that is the hold they called, it was a ****ing horribly late thrown flag. The flag wasn't on the field until after Knox had the ball and started the return.

But the official down on the goal line did throw the flag well before Knox caught it. Twenty yard heave. Good arm I guess.

ForeverChiefs58 · 09-26-2011, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blindside58

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NUC7zYOFaQ

Pants · 09-26-2011, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ForeverChiefs58

You can clearly see the hold at 0:03 of the video.

**BigMeatballDave** · 09-26-2011, 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants

You can clearly see the hold at 0:03 of the video.

I didn't see a hold

**BigMeatballDave** · 09-26-2011, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

I didn't see a hold

Nevermind. It's while the ball is in the air on 21. Shitty call as it had nothing to do with the return.

Chiefnj2 · 10-05-2011, 07:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave

I didn't see a hold

Far left side of the screen. He's blocking the gunner. The gunner gets by him on the inside and he reaches out his right arm and appears to tug on the guys shoulder pad.

**Buck** · 09-26-2011, 06:38 PM

The worst part is that they can't use that play anymore.

stonedstooge · 09-26-2011, 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

The worst part is that they can't use that play anymore.

Chiefs would fall for it

Hootie · 09-26-2011, 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

The worst part is that they can't use that play anymore.

you know? I don't see why not...

that's what drives me crazy about the NFL...

the Saints found a 2 point conversion play that worked yesterday...they did it once, 2 points...they called the same play with the same motion the next time and it worked again...

In 2005 we played the Jets and we started the season with two Scary sweeps (or so I call them), one to Holmes (30 yards) and the next to LJ (TD)...same call, different back, no problem...

I never get why, if a play works, playcallers refuse to go back to that play...we opened the game 2 weeks ago with a great reverse to McCluster that he almost broke to the house but I haven't seen that play since?

Uhm, why?

**Buck** · 09-26-2011, 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Meat Dragon

you know? I don't see why not...

that's what drives me crazy about the NFL...

the Saints found a 2 point conversion play that worked yesterday...they did it once, 2 points...they called the same play with the same motion the next time and it worked again...

In 2005 we played the Jets and we started the season with two Scary sweeps (or so I call them), one to Holmes (30 yards) and the next to LJ (TD)...same call, different back, no problem...

I never get why, if a play works, playcallers refuse to go back to that play...we opened the game 2 weeks ago with a great reverse to McCluster that he almost broke to the house but I haven't seen that play since?

Uhm, why?

That's true, but I think that against the Bears, teams put extra work in on special teams during the week. I think they'll nail it into the players heads to look out for this kind of stuff.

movwills · 10-05-2011, 12:48 AM

This is one of the nice trick in the Football history. Now 341,530 + people has been watched this video and appreciate,,,

el borracho · 09-26-2011, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buck

The worst part is that they can't use that play anymore.

Joe Valerio begs to differ.

Hootie · 09-26-2011, 06:39 PM

there was A TON of money flying around on the Bears/Packers game...more money flows on afternoon games, especially the prime time 3 PM game...

No doubt in my mind this one had Vegas influence all over it...as the holding penalty didn't exist. It just couldn't have possibly existed. It defied all logic.

Much like the Polamalu INT (or fumble recovery) at the end of a Ravens game a few years ago that was clearly, no matter what a meaningless end of the game TD that, for no reason whatsoever, the officials waived off...

09-26-2011, 06:38 PM	#9
Buck Take a Chill Pill Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: South Carolina Casino cash: $5910295	The worst part is that they can't use that play anymore.
Posts: 44,608

10-05-2011, 12:48 AM	#13
movwills Rookie Join Date: Oct 2011 Location: Canada Casino cash: $10004900	This is one of the nice trick in the Football history. Now 341,530 + people has been watched this video and appreciate,,,
Posts: 1

09-26-2011, 06:39 PM	#15
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	there was A TON of money flying around on the Bears/Packers game...more money flows on afternoon games, especially the prime time 3 PM game... No doubt in my mind this one had Vegas influence all over it...as the holding penalty didn't exist. It just couldn't have possibly existed. It defied all logic. Much like the Polamalu INT (or fumble recovery) at the end of a Ravens game a few years ago that was clearly, no matter what a meaningless end of the game TD that, for no reason whatsoever, the officials waived off...
Posts: 56,356