Chiefs How many times did we have problems getting the play call in?

FAX · 12-19-2011, 07:06 AM

I read somewhere that we had 12 guys on the field at some point? Or 10?

It's difficult to tell from the play-by-play whether time-outs were used correctly (no read on the game situation, and all), but I don't think you sustain drives like those with a sideline that's functioning inefficiently.

Oh ... and something that hasn't been talked about much on here is Muir's play-calling. It wasn't all that bad, really. It looks like he mixed things up pretty well. It appears to have been the same, basic play scheme we've been running ... maybe a few more screens (I'm guessing that some of those short passes were screens, anyhow). The big difference appeared to be the fact that the QB actually went through reads and found the open guy ... a lot of critical first downs in that game for the Chiefs.

FAX

12-19-2011, 07:06 AM	#7
FAX testing ... 1, 2, 3 Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Tennessee Casino cash: $6753759	I read somewhere that we had 12 guys on the field at some point? Or 10? It's difficult to tell from the play-by-play whether time-outs were used correctly (no read on the game situation, and all), but I don't think you sustain drives like those with a sideline that's functioning inefficiently. Oh ... and something that hasn't been talked about much on here is Muir's play-calling. It wasn't all that bad, really. It looks like he mixed things up pretty well. It appears to have been the same, basic play scheme we've been running ... maybe a few more screens (I'm guessing that some of those short passes were screens, anyhow). The big difference appeared to be the fact that the QB actually went through reads and found the open guy ... a lot of critical first downs in that game for the Chiefs. FAX
Posts: 44,492