DraftPlanet/CasinoPlanet: A Proposal

[Hammock Parties]

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Omega

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

That's a fair criticism. I guess the thinking is that the two topics are active primarily at different times of the year, so it wouldn't be an issue. The prefixes would also help some, but not entirely.

I suppose there's an option in here of doing a non-destructive "merge" of the two where we leave all the old stuff in one forum or another and give it a try for a year. We'd have to figure out the details of how to make that work, but it might be possible if we're nervous that it might suck.

[SPchief]

Originally Posted by Omega

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

The betting threads are stickied and only run during the football seasons. And there are just a few FF threads.

[crazycoffey]

Originally Posted by Omega

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

then it's your problem for not knowing you can ignore threads you have no interest in.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by Omega

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

Each forum has about a month's worth of threads per page right now... CasinoPlanet wasn't touched from the end of Feb through the end of June last year, and DraftPlanet generated one page of threads from Oct until now.

If you think that's even too much sifting, there are prefixes.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by Omega

I know one thing, I don't want to have to sift through dumb betting threads to read about draft prospects.

Agreed.

[Valiant]

Draftplanet should get dibs in the lounge or its own separate forum during the offseason..

[kstater]

I'll agree to it on one condition: Bring back tags.

[Fritz88]

Originally Posted by kstater

I'll agree to it on one condition: Bring back tags.

Okay.

[crazycoffey]

I'll agree to it on one condition: do not bring back the stupid tags.

[Basileus777]

If you are so worried about clutter, why does every thread about someone's grandmother getting a skinned knee get stickied?

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Basileus777

If you are so worried about clutter, why does every thread about someone's grandmother getting a skinned knee get stickied?

For me, personally? I actually agree. I almost wish the sticky function didn't exist.

But my guess is that most people like stickying prayer threads. I'm certainly not going to push for doing that differently.

[kstater]

Originally Posted by Basileus777

If you are so worried about clutter, why does every thread about someone's grandmother getting a skinned knee get stickied?

Originally Posted by Basileus777

If you are so worried about clutter, why does every thread about someone's grandmother getting a skinned knee get stickied?

That's a good question. I used to only do immediate family and only for 24 hours. But if we want to do away with that courtesy, it's possible to vote it away.

[morphius]

Originally Posted by Phobia

That's a good question. I used to only do immediate family and only for 24 hours. But if we want to do away with that courtesy, it's possible to vote it away.

Well, with the easy ability to ignore thread it shouldn't matter.