Chiefs Jake Long not at top of FA LT list - Page 9

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-11-2013, 08:28 PM

Prove it! How the **** do you prove that? That's like saying "I can prove that Alex Smith will lead the Chiefs to the post-season"! You can't prove that. Conversely, you can pretty much prove the exact opposite.
Posted via Mobile Device

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-11-2013, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Dick Willie

Prove it! How the **** do you prove that? That's like saying "I can prove that Alex Smith will lead the Chiefs to the post-season"! You can't prove that. Conversely, you can pretty much prove the exact opposite.
Posted via Mobile Device

Actually, you want to know the truth? Alex Smith and Matty Ryan are pretty much the same guy. Load up their respective teams with talent and good coaching and you're going to win a shit ton of regular season games. Matt Ryan lost every post season game until this year, when his team eeked out a win over Seattle.

Personally, I've blamed that loss on Pete Carroll for flying his team in on Saturday instead of Thursday. They didn't get hot until the second half and were tired from the 5+ hour flight the day before. But that's neither here nor there because what's done is done.

But in 2013? I see Atlanta, at best, as the fourth best team in the NFC behind SF, Seattle and Green Bay. I expect that Chicago, NY, Washington, New Orleans (with the return of Mickey and Payton) and Dallas to be improved, so they're certainly no shoe-in next year.

Atlanta's playoff games? 30-24 LOSS, none, 48-21 LOSS, 24-2 LOSS, 30-28 Win, 24-28 LOSS.

So, Matt Ryan is elite, eh? Yet he lost by 34, lost by 28, lost by 22, won by 2 and lost by 4.

Kinda makes you think that if he gone to the Dolphins, his career under Tony Sparano would have been much better.

**Saul Good** · 03-11-2013, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Actually, you want to know the truth? Alex Smith and Matty Ryan are pretty much the same guy. Load up their respective teams with talent and good coaching and you're going to win a shit ton of regular season games. Matt Ryan lost every post season game until this year, when his team eeked out a win over Seattle.

Personally, I've blamed that loss on Pete Carroll for flying his team in on Saturday instead of Thursday. They didn't get hot until the second half and were tired from the 5+ hour flight the day before. But that's neither here nor there because what's done is done.

But in 2013? I see Atlanta, at best, as the fourth best team in the NFC behind SF, Seattle and Green Bay. I expect that Chicago, NY, Washington, New Orleans (with the return of Mickey and Payton) and Dallas to be improved, so they're certainly no shoe-in next year.

Atlanta's playoff games? 34-0 LOSS, none, 48-21 LOSS, 24-2 LOSS, 30-28 Win, 24-28 LOSS.

So, Matt Ryan is elite, eh? Yet he lost by 34, lost by 28, lost by 22, won by 2 and lost by 4.

Kinda makes you think that if he gone to the Dolphins, his career under Tony Sparano would have been much better.

So not only do you not understand time, you don't understand reality. That first game you bolded? It never happened.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-11-2013, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

So not only do you not understand time, you don't understand reality. That first game you bolded? It never happened.

You just made my point, Honky.

It was still a loss, 30-24

**Saul Good** · 03-11-2013, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You just made my point, Honky.

It was still a loss, 30-24

Yeah. I made your point pointing out that a rookie QB put up 24 more points on the road in the playoffs than you claimed he did. It really lends credibility to your posts.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 03-11-2013, 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You just made my point, Honky.

It was still a loss, 30-24

lmao.."Honky" FTW
Posted via Mobile Device

**Saul Good** · 03-12-2013, 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Atlanta's playoff games? 30-24 LOSS, none, 48-21 LOSS, 24-2 LOSS, 30-28 Win, 24-28 LOSS.

So, Matt Ryan is elite, eh? Yet he lost by 34, lost by 28, lost by 22, won by 2 and lost by 4.

Your grasp of football is rivaled only by your command of simple arithmetic.

Nightfyre · 03-12-2013, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Your grasp of football is rivaled only by your command of simple arithmetic.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-12-2013, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Your grasp of football is rivaled only by your command of simple arithmetic.

It's nice that your argument is predicated on a typo.

Just more pointless, argumentative bullshit from you.

**Saul Good** · 03-12-2013, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

It's nice that your argument is predicated on a typo.

Just more pointless, argumentative bullshit from you.

I take back my earlier comment about nobody being this dumb. You really take stupidity to new levels. My six year old could score better than 3/5 on a subtraction test. (I don't know if he would be smart enough to take a franchise QB over a LT given the benefit of hindsight, though.)

-King- · 03-11-2013, 09:25 PM

Dolphins record the 5 years before Jake Long: 30-50 (.375)
Dolphins record the 5 years after drafting Jake Long: 38-42 (.475)

Falcons record the 5 years before Matt Ryan: 35-45 (.438)
Falcons record the 5 years after drafting Matt Ryan: 56-24 (.700)

Dane is such an idiot.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-11-2013, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

Dolphins record the 5 years before Jake Long: 30-50
Dolphins record the 5 years after drafting Jake Long: 38-42

Falcons record the 5 years before Matt Ryan: 35-45
Falcons record the 5 years after drafting Matt Ryan: 56-24

Dane is such an idiot.

So go ahead and prove to us all that Matt Ryan would have made Miami a successful franchise and was the better selection.

JFC, you people live in a ****ing bubble.

-King- · 03-11-2013, 09:33 PM

So Dane is pretending that the fact that the Falcons went from being 10 games under .500 before Matt Ryan and then 32 games over .500 after he was drafted means nothing?

Only Dane.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-11-2013, 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King-

So Dane is pretending that the fact that the Falcons went from being 10 games under .500 before Matt Ryan and then 32 games over .500 after he was drafted means nothing?

Only Dane.

Oh, just shut the **** up, Queen.

Keep in mind, you dickless ****tard, the Atlanta Falcons were 8-8 then 7-9 before their cluster**** of a season in 2007.

They had plenty of talent on their roster.

-King- · 03-11-2013, 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Oh, just shut the **** up, Queen.

Keep in mind, you dickless ****tard, the Atlanta Falcons were 8-8 then 7-9 before their cluster**** of a season in 2007.

They had plenty of talent on their roster.

And the Dolphins were 9-7 and 6-10 before their cluster**** of a season in 2007.

Jeez, you make some dumb ass points.

03-11-2013, 08:28 PM	#1
Sweet Daddy Hate Unsparing Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	Prove it! How the **** do you prove that? That's like saying "I can prove that Alex Smith will lead the Chiefs to the post-season"! You can't prove that. Conversely, you can pretty much prove the exact opposite. Posted via Mobile Device
Posts: 77,135

03-11-2013, 09:25 PM	#11
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1494257	Dolphins record the 5 years before Jake Long: 30-50 (.375) Dolphins record the 5 years after drafting Jake Long: 38-42 (.475) Falcons record the 5 years before Matt Ryan: 35-45 (.438) Falcons record the 5 years after drafting Matt Ryan: 56-24 (.700) Dane is such an idiot. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 65,489

03-11-2013, 09:33 PM	#13
-King- ▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓ Join Date: Jan 2009 Casino cash: $-1494257	So Dane is pretending that the fact that the Falcons went from being 10 games under .500 before Matt Ryan and then 32 games over .500 after he was drafted means nothing? Only Dane. __________________ 🏁
Posts: 65,489