Chiefs Assuming Albert gets traded, what would you like the Chiefs to do... - Page 5

**YayMike** · 03-24-2013, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Kiper doesnt see Joeckel as BPA.

I would actually like if we traded back and grabbed Ansah or Jordan.

Though this draft doesnt have a "superstar" it looks like it has a lot of potential contributors. id like to see us trade back a few times in the first round instead of just taking a ****ing tackle. This is yet another reason idont think Albert is traded, but kept this year as the franchise level.

AlexSmithDynasty · 03-24-2013, 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Kiper doesnt see Joeckel as BPA.

I would actually like if we traded back and grabbed Ansah or Jordan.

From the latest big board I saw Kiper didn't even have Geno in his top 25, he has Joeckel top 5 but he has Fisher above him. CBS big board has Joeckel #1 and Geno #9. WalterFootball has Joeckel #1, Geno #30. Sports Illustrated has Joeckel #1, Geno # 24, they bumped him up 2 spots after his pro day. The point is to anyone saying they have flexibility for BPA at #1 is that Geno is not BPA according to almost everyone. If he was no way they give up a 2nd rounder for Alex Smith when they could have signed one of a number of available vets for cheap if they wanted to develop Geno behind someone else.

DTLB58 · 03-24-2013, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by YayMike

It all comes down to some team wanting to overpay for Albert, overpay for the #1 and who we actually view as the BPA at #1. From day one this group has preached BPA...

I don't want to lose Albert, but think of the possibilities in this draft and next, IF the Chiefs take a haul in picks for Albert and a trade down from them first spot?

Yes, they will have to spend 1 to replace him. But I'm thinking more and more everyday THIS has been part of the grand plan all along. Just as was the acquisition of Alex Smith discussed in Philly that day.

**YayMike** · 03-24-2013, 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DTLB58

I don't want to lose Albert, but think of the possibilities in this draft and next, IF the Chiefs take a haul in picks for Albert and a trade down from them first spot?

Yes, they will have to spend 1 to replace him. But I'm thinking more and more everyday THIS has been part of the grand plan all along. Just as was the acquisition of Alex Smith discussed in Philly that day.

Yep, I agree. My only bitch is that a few of the moves are win-now moves, signing Bowe, Colquitt, Smith and Smith, yet the trading of Albert, trading down for more picks and drafting a LT are win-later moves.

Now i'm not saying that we can't do BOTH, but they seem to kind of cancel each other out.

keg in kc · 03-24-2013, 05:39 PM

Pick up two tackles in free agency so we can be completely flexible with the #1 pick.

penbrook · 03-24-2013, 05:39 PM

Im guessing the only thing left they have to get in free agency is ILB.

**Bowser** · 03-24-2013, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Im guessing the only thing left they have to get in free agency is ILB.

Speaking of.....

Has anyone signed that ILB from San Fran, the guy that backed up Patrick Willis when he was out? Larry something.....

penbrook · 03-24-2013, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bowser

Speaking of.....

Has anyone signed that ILB from San Fran, the guy that backed up Patrick Willis when he was out? Larry something.....

Larry Grant.

Nope he is still on the market!!

**Bowser** · 03-24-2013, 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penbook

Larry Grant.

Nope he is still on the market!!

He'd be worth throwing some money at. Lining him up next to three pro bowlers = **** yeah.

HotCarl · 03-24-2013, 05:49 PM

If Albert doesn't want to be a team player, he can take a hike.

penbrook · 03-24-2013, 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

If Albert doesn't want to be a team player, he can take a hike.

Albert deserves to be a LT. He has proven that he can play that position extremely well.

I support Alberts decision.

milkman · 03-24-2013, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HotCarl

If Albert doesn't want to be a team player, he can take a hike.

I would hope that he takes a hike to your house and blocks your ass with a shit encrusted toilet brush.

**YayMike** · 03-24-2013, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I would hope that he takes a hike to your house and blocks your ass with a shit encrusted toilet brush.

O.city · 03-24-2013, 06:12 PM

One of the bigger reasons I want to keep Albert, is that he's pretty much the leader up front at this point. A rookie LT would be fine if we had a pretty established group up there to start, but we don't.

penbrook · 03-24-2013, 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city

One of the bigger reasons I want to keep Albert, is that he's pretty much the leader up front at this point. A rookie LT would be fine if we had a pretty established group up there to start, but we don't.

But what about Stephenson??

03-24-2013, 05:39 PM	#5
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	Pick up two tackles in free agency so we can be completely flexible with the #1 pick.
Posts: 58,682

03-24-2013, 05:39 PM	#6
penbrook LEGEND! Join Date: Feb 2013 Casino cash: $10033840	Im guessing the only thing left they have to get in free agency is ILB.
Posts: 16,409

03-24-2013, 05:49 PM	#10
HotCarl Registered User Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Miami, FL Casino cash: $10004900	If Albert doesn't want to be a team player, he can take a hike.
Posts: 463

03-24-2013, 06:12 PM	#14
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2404064	One of the bigger reasons I want to keep Albert, is that he's pretty much the leader up front at this point. A rookie LT would be fine if we had a pretty established group up there to start, but we don't.
Posts: 81,534