|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Starter
Join Date: Feb 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
He wasn't seen as the best tackle until about one day before the draft (when experts probably started hearing leaks the Chiefs would take him).. He'll be a decent starter but for 1.1 be disappointing overall.
|
Posts: 57
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
Casino cash: $-272225
|
Eric Fisher? pull your head outta your ass...
|
Posts: 98,598
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Colorado
Casino cash: $423600
|
I'm very "meh" over the possibility of losing BA while drafting EF. I like the idea of keeping both if it happens.
A common ailment for big men are back problems. Not always career fatal but usually the sign that the peak has occured. BA has already missed a few games with that. Getting a stud to replace him even if he plays right tackle for a year is good insurance. If BA is fine next year then try and keep him around and your have BEAST bookends on the line, if not, then you have a replacement for him if he goes down. There are other needs on the team but after tying a record for not leading a minute in regulation for over 8 games I'm glad that they're doing something to improve the offense.
__________________
An armed member of society is a citizen, an unarmed member is a subject. |
Posts: 3,996
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Seasons in the Abyss
Join Date: Jan 2010
Casino cash: $10010596
|
I think Fish will be a multiple Pro Bowl left tackle from his rookie season onward. He is a superb pass blocker and he mauls in the run game with a nasty approach.
Did not want OT 1.1, but Fish will be a monster, mark my words. |
Posts: 4,746
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sydney, Australia
Casino cash: $5688501
|
Pro bowl by year two?
|
Posts: 13,760
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1855503
|
I'm not sure why people keep saying he needs to be a pro bowler to be considered a good draft pick.
He has to be better or measure up to anyone taken in the top 10. And Geno has to be worse than whatever QB we end up using in 3 years. That's it. It's not like we had a ton of surefire future pro bowlers sitting there at the #1 pick. |
Posts: 51,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Man of Culture
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Far Beyond Comprehension
Casino cash: $-3087187
|
Quote:
With the Albert issue, this pick has to be an ungodly upgrade or it will be like slamming your dick in the door with no payoff.
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 43,464
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1855503
|
Quote:
A long list of other offensive linemen? A bunch of DE/OLBs to sit in line with Hali and Houston? A QB who fell a full round? To trade down several spots to take a worse player and only get a 2nd rounder in return? The only two guys that could have made sense were Milliner and Tavon Austin. Let's not be ridiculous and suggest that the Chiefs had very many options to work with. Given the shitty options, Fisher was a good pick and if he's as good as Albert, that's fine. |
|
Posts: 51,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Man of Culture
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Far Beyond Comprehension
Casino cash: $-3087187
|
Why not? The #1 overall pick you expect excellence not mediocrity. It's that easy, and it's the cruel truth.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 43,464
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1855503
|
No, the cruel truth is that this was a lackluster draft class. Again, what was your alternative? I laid them all out for you and they were no better than picking Fisher.
|
Posts: 51,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Dumbass!
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Leading the Marty bashing
Casino cash: $10029395
|
Quote:
That is mind boggling stupid.
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 70,769
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1855503
|
Nobody in the top 10 fits that bill. Except Geno Smith, who fell a full round and maybe Dee Milliner. The Chiefs had no good options. This was a fine bad option. At the very least, you can grab a decent 2014 pick out of Albert and save $5-6M a year.
|
Posts: 51,697
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
▓▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓▓
Join Date: Jan 2009
Casino cash: $-1504257
|
Top 10 RT his rookie year.
Top 10 LT next year Top 5 LT the rest of his career. Posted via Mobile Device |
Posts: 65,492
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I expect him to be elite out of the gate.
anything else will disappoint me however, watching the draft unfold...he was clearly the right pick |
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
look I think Branden Albert was a very serviceable tackle
but he did have a knack for being injured he is getting older and he is going to be expensive and there is absolutely no reason to believe Fisher won't be an upgrade Albert was good, but he certainly wasn't elite. And for 1 year we'll have the best RT we've had since Tait...and he may even be better. That's not exciting but it's definitely an upgrade. |
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|