Calling my shot. - Page 10

03-09-2005, 08:23 PM

2 days ago, I called BS when Carl said they were turning their attention away from Linebackers.

Based upon information available to everybody who follows football and the fact that he's received no other offers from his other visits....

it is my opinion that Hartwell will be introduced as a Chief tomorrow morning.

You should be advised that I'm probably wrong. I haven't called any sources and nobody has called me to break any news. I'm just applying some deductive reasoning here.

booger · 03-09-2005, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

Jager bomber!

I thought you liked tequila rose and bubble baths?

03-09-2005, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG K

It could have been DT's injury that slowed the progress of that position. I remember DT saying that with that much freedom, he expected to get 20+ sacks that year. The overall unit that year was indeed impressive....Been a very long time since we could have said that about the defense. Still, Allens natural abilities intrigue.

Allen is impressive. We'll soon know how far he can go....

Nice to see you around, K-mart.

Been a while.

How's the kiddo?

bringbackmarty · 03-09-2005, 11:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufusmaqe

Let's explain this one more time.

The Chiefs have withdrawn from NEGOTIATIONS. They haven't withdrawn their OFFER.

That means we have a standing offer on the table and we're telling him to sign it or go elsewhere. We're done negotiating, but that doesn't mean we won't do it if he comes back and wants to sign...

I got the gist of that yesterday @ 5:00 why don't the rest of the plannit be witit?

03-09-2005, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by booger

I thought you liked tequila rose and bubble baths?

That's Laz. Or boozer.... or donger or bonger.... or booger.... or bowser....

holy shit this place is confusing.

Nightfyre · 03-09-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringbackmarty

I got the gist of that yesterday @ 5:00 why don't the rest of the plannit be witit?

Its a mat... with conclusions (chiefsplanet members) jump to!

I tried to as well.

booger · 03-09-2005, 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

Cool post. I nearly posted this as a trivia question earlier in this thread (ie: Who was DT's backup at the Falcon?) but didn't for some reason.

While I didn't think Gunther's Falcon hybrid was incredibly effective, I think Allen would have been ideal for that position. Unfortunately, we don't have the personnel to be that creative this year. That unit gelled like.... well, like a Patriots unit. Everybody knew where they were supposed to be and they covered one another's back.

Anthony Davis Played outstanding that year at WLB. We havn't had anyone play it the same since, including Donnie Edwards.

Didn't hurt to have a "motivated Dan Williams" either.

Brando · 03-09-2005, 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

That's Laz. Or boozer.... or donger or bonger.... or booger.... or bowser....

holy shit this place is confusing.

The worst was when everyone one had Jake flipping the bird as their avatar.

booger · 03-09-2005, 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

That's Laz. Or boozer.... or donger or bonger.... or booger.... or bowser....

holy shit this place is confusing.

I believe it twas Gaz, maybe?

BIG K · 03-09-2005, 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

Allen is impressive. We'll soon know how far he can go....

Nice to see you around, K-mart.

Been a while.

How's the kiddo?

Good to be here. She's doing great. Learned yesterday that she will be graduating at the top of the k-garden class!! Things have finally settled down and based out, you know what I mean. How are all the girls?

BTW: Hope you are right about Hartwell....

tk13 · 03-09-2005, 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brando

The worst was when everyone one had Jake flipping the bird as their avatar.

Dude! That was my idea! That was brilliant! We beat the crap out of the Broncos worse than we have in years too! You should all be thanking me for my wonderful idea.

bringbackmarty · 03-09-2005, 11:25 PM

I disagree bout the sensus here that we cant run the 3\4. we can run the falcon. Bell could be the falcon, so could jason taylor (trade holmes for surtain and taylor). so could mitchell, stills (once or twice a game), allen could be the rush side end on passing, Hicks on the other side. Browning in place of allen or backing up hicks mostly on 1st down and second and short. dalton sims siavi rotating inthe middle? ****in tweak it, don't play a 34 all the time improvise. be unconventional;. get the players tweak the scheme.

htismaqe · 03-10-2005, 06:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG K

It could have been DT's injury that slowed the progress of that position. I remember DT saying that with that much freedom, he expected to get 20+ sacks that year. The overall unit that year was indeed impressive....Been a very long time since we could have said that about the defense. Still, Allens natural abilities intrigue.

Uh, that's not how I remembered it.

I remember Thomas being upset about the position.

htismaqe · 03-10-2005, 06:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringbackmarty

I disagree bout the sensus here that we cant run the 3\4. we can run the falcon. Bell could be the falcon, so could jason taylor (trade holmes for surtain and taylor). so could mitchell, stills (once or twice a game), allen could be the rush side end on passing, Hicks on the other side. Browning in place of allen or backing up hicks mostly on 1st down and second and short. dalton sims siavi rotating inthe middle? ****in tweak it, don't play a 34 all the time improvise. be unconventional;. get the players tweak the scheme.

Somebody needs to cut down on the angel dust.

CHIEF4EVER · 03-10-2005, 06:30 AM

We don't have the personnel to run the 3-4. And the "Falcon" was the worst idea EVAR in our history. Most people forget how Derrick Thomas hated it and how teams used to run the ball STRAIGHT at DT. Forget the 3-4, we would need a whole slew of players to make it work.

CHIEF4EVER · 03-10-2005, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringbackmarty

(trade holmes for surtain and taylor).

03-09-2005, 08:23 PM
Phobia Guest Casino cash: $	Calling my shot. 2 days ago, I called BS when Carl said they were turning their attention away from Linebackers. Based upon information available to everybody who follows football and the fact that he's received no other offers from his other visits.... it is my opinion that Hartwell will be introduced as a Chief tomorrow morning. You should be advised that I'm probably wrong. I haven't called any sources and nobody has called me to break any news. I'm just applying some deductive reasoning here.
Posts: n/a

03-09-2005, 11:25 PM	#146
bringbackmarty Gonna go back in time.... Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $2735510	I disagree bout the sensus here that we cant run the 3\4. we can run the falcon. Bell could be the falcon, so could jason taylor (trade holmes for surtain and taylor). so could mitchell, stills (once or twice a game), allen could be the rush side end on passing, Hicks on the other side. Browning in place of allen or backing up hicks mostly on 1st down and second and short. dalton sims siavi rotating inthe middle? ****in tweak it, don't play a 34 all the time improvise. be unconventional;. get the players tweak the scheme.
Posts: 3,038

03-10-2005, 06:30 AM	#149
CHIEF4EVER Just a man in the 'ghan Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Jalalabad, Afghanistan Casino cash: $10004900	We don't have the personnel to run the 3-4. And the "Falcon" was the worst idea EVAR in our history. Most people forget how Derrick Thomas hated it and how teams used to run the ball STRAIGHT at DT. Forget the 3-4, we would need a whole slew of players to make it work. __________________ "Igitur qui deciderat pacem, praeparatur bellum" -Flavius Vegetius Renatus
Posts: 13,670