|
10-14-2019, 06:23 PM | #151 |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
"$1m... $2m... $3m... $4m...$5m..."
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
Posts: 32,166
|
1 0 |
10-14-2019, 06:25 PM | #152 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
Quote:
Great post. |
|
Posts: 55,715
|
0 1 |
10-14-2019, 06:26 PM | #153 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2019
Casino cash: $5980400
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 1,506
|
10-14-2019, 06:27 PM | #154 |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
|
Posts: 55,715
|
10-14-2019, 06:33 PM | #155 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
Quote:
It was never reviewed, period. They didn't review it themselves. They listened to their little earpiece. If they can just be like "our bad, it's not DPI", then they can change it to illegal contact. But they didn't - they seized the opportunity to get Houston back in the game. They should've went with the call on the field and made Houston challenge the DPI call.
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
|
Posts: 32,166
|
10-14-2019, 06:36 PM | #156 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
Quote:
If they can change it to what it ISN'T - a no-call interception - with no challenge, they can change it to what it really was - illegal contact.
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
|
Posts: 32,166
|
1 0 |
10-14-2019, 06:36 PM | #157 |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2019
Casino cash: $5980400
|
it wasn’t DPI. they said it was, but it wasn’t. it was either holding or illegal contact. the ball was not thrown to Kelce so it can’t be DPI. like i said, they called it wrong.
|
Posts: 1,506
|
10-14-2019, 06:37 PM | #158 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
Quote:
There was nothing to review. The pass didn’t go to kelce and they said the contact happened while the ball was in the air. So nothing is reviewable by rule. Pat should have thrown the ball at Kelce if he wanted the call. |
|
Posts: 55,715
|
10-14-2019, 06:38 PM | #159 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Casino cash: $4201711
|
Quote:
Kelce, a 6'5" 250 lb tight end, ended up on the ground, after getting locked up with a Lonnie Johnson, Jr., a 6'2" 213 lb DB. The initial contact happened within 5 yards of the line of scrimmage, making it legal at that moment. There appears from the replay that there was also contact beyond five yards that might have been while Mahomes still had the ball and which would have thus, by the strict letter of the law, represented illegal contact, but that's the kind of thing that happens routinely in the NFL and often is not called. It's arguable that it should be called, as Mahomes didn't throw at Kelce and Kelce's engagement with that defender kept that defender occupied, seemingly at Kelce's discretion because there isn't really any ****in' reason for a player as big as Kelce to let himself be manhandled by a smaller DB. Personally, I don't want to watch football games where ticky-tack fouls get called. That's not football. According to Mahomes comments after the game, Kelce got locked up while doing a designed "double move" that, had it been successful, would have put Kelce in the vicinity of the ball. In other words, Mahomes is claiming that Kelce was the intended target and that he threw the ball to where he did because he saw Kelce begin to execute the double move, https://www.kansascity.com/sports/nf...236092143.html If that's true, then that clearly establishes that Mahomes was not "taking a shot" downfield because he saw a flag. It also invites the question, would any reasonable football fan want to have a pass like that be considered catchable by Kelce. I sure wouldn't. Kelce was nowhere near the football. I don't like when refs give teams yards they didn't actually earn. I would have liked it better had the refs called illegal contact, but I can see what they didn't and non-calls like that happen all of the time. That call is not why the Chiefs lost that game yesterday. Last edited by DanT; 10-14-2019 at 06:46 PM.. |
|
Posts: 4,231
|
10-14-2019, 06:40 PM | #160 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2019
Casino cash: $5980400
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 1,506
|
0 1 |
10-14-2019, 06:40 PM | #161 | |
Shit
Join Date: Jun 2008
Casino cash: $10039067
|
Quote:
He even said “ the contact happened while the ball was in the air, so it’s not d holding”... |
|
Posts: 55,715
|
10-14-2019, 06:42 PM | #162 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Casino cash: $4201711
|
Quote:
Here are things that can be reviewed Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
Posts: 4,231
|
0 2 |
10-14-2019, 06:44 PM | #163 | |
left blank intentionally
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Belize Nuts
Casino cash: $4664897
|
Quote:
They don't give a **** if the Chiefs win or lose, they just want close games in the 4th qtr. People who don't see the manipulation are monosyllabic rubes.
__________________
MY ADOPT-A-CHIEF : Jody Fortson Jr. |
|
Posts: 32,166
|
1 0 |
10-14-2019, 06:45 PM | #164 |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Davis, CA
Casino cash: $4201711
|
For 2019, the NFL made pass interference calls and non-calls reviewable. This was notable because pass interference is a judgment call and judgment calls are the sort of thing that is hard to make reviewable in a way that seems transparent and fair and without disrupting what fans have come to expect as OK and not OK.
|
Posts: 4,231
|
0 2 |
10-14-2019, 06:45 PM | #165 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2017
Casino cash: $2010400
|
The unanswered question is what prompted them to change the call after they had huddled, announced the call, moved the ball forward and chiefs were preparing for the next snap.
|
Posts: 7,333
|
1 0 |
|
|