Chiefs Is it conceivable for the Chiefs to dump Pioli & Haley and get Cowher for GM & HC? - Page 15

kcbubb · 12:09 AM

I never wanted Pioli or Haley and I would love to see Cowher in KC. Is it possible?

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-02-2009, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

let me help you:

I think out of McGraw/Morgan/Page one of them will stick as a starter for a few years here.

There ya go, its in crayon so it makes it easier for you! Is that better?

Why do you think that?

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

You're a ****ing idiot. Seriously. If the Chiefs had kept Jared Allen, do you really think they'd have performed so poorly last year?

I really don't think you know a ****ing thing about the NFL.

So, now you want to move the goalposts to make yourself feel better and put more words in my mouth?

I hated the Jared Allen trade, that doesn't mean Pioli should have kept rolling with the ****ing 4-3 after he was gone does it, idiot?

JFC <---------see how I did that?

Just quit while your behind!

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Why do you think that?

you want the answer in ink or crayon?

dallaschiefsfan · 11-02-2009, 12:49 PM

In response to the OP........NO. Never going to happen.

Brock · 11-02-2009, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

you want the answer in ink or crayon?

Where's that link for the statement you keep making about the Packers offering 2 1st round picks for Larry Johnson? You can post it in your favorite lipstick for all I care.

Chiefnj2 · 11-02-2009, 12:53 PM

Pollard was solid? Now we have people defending Pollard and arguing KC should have stuck with him? Where was this support 2 months ago?

salame · 11-02-2009, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

While I agree with this, dont you realize that you have to build the foundation first? Good teams do.

If TJ does his job, our rush defense will be much improved for years to come and the rushbacker we hand select to play behind him will excell.

The dline is every bit as important to the defense as the oline is to the offense. Without it the talent cant do its thing.

Its WAAAAAAY to early to be calling it a wasted pick.

Nobody we chose was gonna come in and turn this thing around single-handedly.

rushbacker lol

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

Where's that link for the statement you keep making about the Packers offering 2 1st round picks for Larry Johnson? You can post it in your favorite lipstick for all I care.

I already answered you, I had it bookmarked on my old computer and couldn't find it again, only one saying they offered a 1 and 4, I retracted the statement because I couldn't prove it. I love how a statement I made once now has turned into "keep making" though...

I would have traded him for just a 1 at the time, I would link my posts from back then to show that was my stance, but it was before my time here and the CC crashed and had to restart everything a year and a half ago.

Boy would that 1 would look good right now (assuming we wouldnt have just wasted the pick anyway)!

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame

rushbacker lol

somewhat witty, huh!

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-02-2009, 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Pollard was solid? Now we have people defending Pollard and arguing KC should have stuck with him? Where was this support 2 months ago?

Hey, you won't find me in the camp that wanted to replace Pollard NOW.

Down the line, sure. That would hopefully be DaJuan Morgan. But the Chiefs had MUCH greater needs on defense than replacing Pollard.

And they sure didn't need to go backwards, which is exactly what they have done.

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

Pollard was solid? Now we have people defending Pollard and arguing KC should have stuck with him? Where was this support 2 months ago?

not on this board.

I defended Pollard in the preseason when he wasnt playing well and I got three neg reps for my effort, I decided not to pursue that further.

I posted the link to the Texans site where I started an account and asked them how Pollard was doing and all the "supporters" came out of the woodwork.

salame · 11-02-2009, 01:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

somewhat witty, huh!

No, it's really reeruned. You say it all the time and I make fun of it all the time. There is no such position as "rushbacker"
All of your arguments are terrible and you consistently make yourself look like a moran.

Go away.

**BossChief** · 11-02-2009, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame

No, it's really reeruned. You say it all the time and I make fun of it all the time. There is no such position as "rushbacker"
All of your arguments are terrible and you consistently make yourself look like a moran.

Go away.

The rolb in a 3-4 is basically the same as a rde in a 4-3 with a few more responsibilities, rushing the passer is the main responsibility as well as setting the edge in stopping the run. Hence my use of rushbacker in place of rolb.

your welcome!

now **** off!

salame · 11-02-2009, 01:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief

The rolb in a 3-4 is basically the same as a rde in a 4-3 with a few more responsibilities, rushing the passer is the main responsibility as well as setting the edge in stopping the run. Hence my use of rushbacker in place of rolb.

your welcome!

now **** off!

Look I know you had some grand idea that it would catch on and everyone would be saying rushbacker and you would feel really cool. But it's not happening and again you just look sad and reeruned like every single argument I have seen you make in this thread.

**DaneMcCloud** · 11-02-2009, 01:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salame

Look I know you had some grand idea that it would catch on and everyone would be saying rushbacker and you would feel really cool. But it's not happening and again you just look sad and reeruned like every single argument I have seen you make in this thread.

He makes all kinds of silly arguments that don't stick.

I have no idea how the guy has any green.

10-31-2009, 11:52 PM
kcbubb Veteran Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $4996719	Is it conceivable for the Chiefs to dump Pioli & Haley and get Cowher for GM & HC? I never wanted Pioli or Haley and I would love to see Cowher in KC. Is it possible? Last edited by kcbubb; 11-01-2009 at 12:09 AM..
Posts: 2,558

11-02-2009, 12:49 PM	#214
dallaschiefsfan Herm is the worst...horrible Join Date: Sep 2000 Casino cash: $3048850	In response to the OP........NO. Never going to happen. __________________
Posts: 2,033

11-02-2009, 12:53 PM	#216
Chiefnj2 In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2007 Casino cash: $6654388	Pollard was solid? Now we have people defending Pollard and arguing KC should have stuck with him? Where was this support 2 months ago? __________________ Mismanaging the clock.
Posts: 22,541