Football This Sanchez Chap - Page 16

milkman · 10-04-2009, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefDave

Well, sure he's making plays. His OL gives him time to do this.

I'm not disputing that, though if you watch, you will see that he has been making plays even when under pressure.

What I'm doing is disputing the notion that the Jets are winnig simply because Mark Sanchez is not losing games for them.

He's making plays, even in in tough third and long situations.

No.
Especially in tough third and long situations.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 10-04-2009, 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

I haven't thrown any barbs in this discussion and right off the bat you come at me with the dumbass. Nice.

I know it's a team game. I've spent more time playing it than you have using your fucking metamucil and drinking ensure. But the fact is Sanchez is being carried by his defense. When you're throwing for 168 yard you're not "winning" games. You're just not losing them. When you're defense is only allowing 15 points a game you don't have to make a lot of "clutch" plays to win games. Just don't fuck it up. So far that's what he has done. Today we'll see what happens if the Saints hang 30 on them and he's asked to keep up. I don't think he'll fare so well.

Only from the mind of a ****ing Chiefs True Fan could this shit come.

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I'm not disputing that, though if you watch, you will see that he has been making plays even when under pressure.

What I'm doing is disputing the notion that the Jets are winnig simply because Mark Sanchez is not losing games for them.

He's making plays, even in in tough third and long situations.

No.
Especially in tough third and long situations.

You might as well talk to a wall when dealing with a Casshole.

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-04-2009, 10:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

I'm not disputing that, though if you watch, you will see that he has been making plays even when under pressure.

What I'm doing is disputing the notion that the Jets are winnig simply because Mark Sanchez is not losing games for them.

He's making plays, even in in tough third and long situations.

No.
Especially in tough third and long situations.

I agree completely. He is making plays. The whole team is playing well. Especially the D. Plus, they can run the ball. Even though I am a supporter of Cassel, Sanchez has been sacked just as many times.

Reerun_KC · 10-04-2009, 06:50 AM

BTW, nobody, nobody in the NFL is talking about our QB...

Pioli Zombie · 10-04-2009, 07:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

BTW, nobody, nobody in the NFL is talking about our QB...

They sure were when he played in New England and had an NFL caliber offensive line. And I'm sure the fact that Sanchez plays in New York has nothing to do with the hype.
Posted via Mobile Device

**BigMeatballDave** · 10-04-2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC

BTW, nobody, nobody in the NFL is talking about our QB...

Nobody is talking about the rest of our team, either. The whole team sucks. That has nothing to do with Cassel.

**Reaper16** · 10-04-2009, 09:58 AM

Hey, Guardian -- where'd you play college ball at? I'm not attempting to make fun of you or anything; I'm a big fan of small-school football.

**The Bad Guy** · 10-04-2009, 10:31 AM

If you dispute hte Jets are winning because of Sanchez, then you are a ****ing tard who should off themselves immediately.

The guy is going to be a stud, pure and simple.

The Guardian makes Herm Edwards actually look competent.

Congrats D12. I'm hoping the Chiefs turn around after getting rid of Herm like the Jets did someday.

bringbackmarty · 10-04-2009, 10:32 AM

I like em both, but Sanchez looks like he could be special, while Cassel looks like he might just be above average. You can win a super bowl with either, but if you go with Cassel your team has to be rock solid to incredible in all the other phases of the game.

Sanchez - you just have to hang in there, and he'll win it for you if it's close. If the Jets d can't stop the Saints for some reason, we will see what kind of QB he really is with a three touchdown deficit going into the second half.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 10-04-2009, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bringbackmarty

I like em both, but Sanchez looks like he could be special, while Cassel looks like he might just be above average. You can win a super bowl with either, but if you go with Cassel your team has to be rock solid to incredible in all the other phases of the game.

And that's what the "Kansas City Way"( that's right, enough of that NE terminology FFS )is going to be about.

You can't have all world at every position, so you build a roster comprised of slightly above average players at each position as you try to make your backups better than the other teams backups.
And the result is a whole that is greater than the sum of it's parts. Hopefully.

kstater · 10-04-2009, 11:00 AM

Whelp, today is judgment day for the trade for Cassel. Cassel faces an undefeated team today as well as Sanchez. Clearly Sanchez comes out victorious today while Cassel loses, the Chiefs made a mistake in not drafting Sanchez.

Pablo · 10-04-2009, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kstater

Whelp, today is judgment day for the trade for Cassel. Cassel faces an undefeated team today as well as Sanchez. Clearly Sanchez comes out victorious today while Cassel loses, the Chiefs made a mistake in not drafting Sanchez.

LOL.

TheGuardian · 10-04-2009, 04:51 PM

I told you idiot Sanchez poke smokers that you were full of shit. You have no clue as to what you are fucking talking about.

I saw a guy today that has no field presence, no clock in his head, can't read a defense, and can only throw screens and quick slants. I told you he'd shit the bed when he got behind and was forced to win a game.

The Jets have been winning because of defense. Hell, they had a chance to get back in it today because of that defense even though Sanchez gave the Saints 14 points all by himself.

He's no Matt Ryan or Flacco. And you guys who thought so are football mental midgets, and don't have a god damned clue as to what you are talking about.

Sweet Daddy Hate · 10-04-2009, 04:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheGuardian

I told you idiot Sanchez poke smokers that you were full of shit. You have no clue as to what you are fucking talking about.

I saw a guy today that has no field presence, no clock in his head, can't read a defense, and can only throw screens and quick slants. I told you he'd shit the bed when he got behind and was forced to win a game.

The Jets have been winning because of defense. Hell, they had a chance to get back in it today because of that defense even though Sanchez gave the Saints 14 points all by himself.

He's no Matt Ryan or Flacco. And you guys who thought so are football mental midgets, and don't have a god damned clue as to what you are talking about.

Go **** yourself reerunian, you knew nothing and you know nothing.
Jets will go 500 as I said to you before, and Sanchez will be a big part of it.
You're a ****ing clown; go die in a fire.

-King- · 10-04-2009, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

Go **** yourself reerunian, you knew nothing and you know nothing.
Jets will go 500 as I said to you before, and Sanchez will be a big part of it.
You're a ****ing clown; go die in a fire.

Well, atleast you were only off by 256 yards. And Sanchez looked magnificent.

10-04-2009, 06:50 AM	#4
Reerun_KC Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7231160	BTW, nobody, nobody in the NFL is talking about our QB...
Posts: 1,529

10-04-2009, 10:31 AM	#8
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	If you dispute hte Jets are winning because of Sanchez, then you are a ****ing tard who should off themselves immediately. The guy is going to be a stud, pure and simple. The Guardian makes Herm Edwards actually look competent. Congrats D12. I'm hoping the Chiefs turn around after getting rid of Herm like the Jets did someday. __________________
Posts: 23,216

10-04-2009, 10:32 AM	#9
bringbackmarty Gonna go back in time.... Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $1225510	I like em both, but Sanchez looks like he could be special, while Cassel looks like he might just be above average. You can win a super bowl with either, but if you go with Cassel your team has to be rock solid to incredible in all the other phases of the game. Sanchez - you just have to hang in there, and he'll win it for you if it's close. If the Jets d can't stop the Saints for some reason, we will see what kind of QB he really is with a three touchdown deficit going into the second half. __________________ https://www.facebook.com/The-Pheasan...6018120266009/
Posts: 3,085

10-04-2009, 11:00 AM	#11
kstater Custom User Title Join Date: Jan 2007 Casino cash: $-1693437	Whelp, today is judgment day for the trade for Cassel. Cassel faces an undefeated team today as well as Sanchez. Clearly Sanchez comes out victorious today while Cassel loses, the Chiefs made a mistake in not drafting Sanchez.
Posts: 40,007

10-04-2009, 04:51 PM	#13
TheGuardian MVP Join Date: Mar 2009 Casino cash: $6305299	I told you idiot Sanchez poke smokers that you were full of shit. You have no clue as to what you are fucking talking about. I saw a guy today that has no field presence, no clock in his head, can't read a defense, and can only throw screens and quick slants. I told you he'd shit the bed when he got behind and was forced to win a game. The Jets have been winning because of defense. Hell, they had a chance to get back in it today because of that defense even though Sanchez gave the Saints 14 points all by himself. He's no Matt Ryan or Flacco. And you guys who thought so are football mental midgets, and don't have a god damned clue as to what you are talking about.
Posts: 9,564