I hope we get freakin slaughtered

[blsilks]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

shows how much you know...it's year 15 of Carl's 5 year plan.


~I wanted to be the first to post that...I can see it coming.

I just wanted to use decade because it makes it sound soooo long and it was an estimate but saying 15 years even support my point even further.

[KCTitus]

Originally Posted by blsilks

I just wanted to use decade because it makes it sound soooo long and it was an estimate but saying 15 years even support my point even further.

Or you could have used 3 Lustrom...that would have sounded even worse or you could have said 'almost a quarter century' -- that's pretty ominous too...

[blsilks]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Or you could have used 3 Lustrom...that would have sounded even worse or you could have said 'almost a quarter century' -- that's pretty ominous too...

"Since the beginning of the age of man" also sound pretty good but the Carl lovers might end up calling me a liar.

[Brock]

Originally Posted by KCTitus

Or you could have used 3 Lustrom...that would have sounded even worse or you could have said 'almost a quarter century' -- that's pretty ominous too...

I generally use "a decade and a half".

[cadmonkey]

I hope you guys get slaughtered too

[ptlyon]

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

Shouldn't you be propositioning a one-legged prostitute?

Rep for the Boston Legal reference

Well actually it won't let me until I spread some more around. So I guess you'll have to do without.

[BigRedChief]

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

Shouldn't you be propositioning a one-legged prostitute?

Or midget Lesbians

[cadmonkey]

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

Shouldn't you be propositioning a one-legged prostitute?

I took care of that already. and you really remember the strangest sh*t!

[KCWolfman]

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

Shouldn't you be propositioning a one-legged prostitute?

You know Eileen?

[The Bad Guy]

I'm not pulling for them to get slaughtered, but if this team finishes 8-8 all we will hear about is that injuries did us in and there won't be any changes made.

This season is already a wash and we aren't making the playoffs so if losing brings changes and allows us to draft a better player then it's fine with me.

Vermeil has proven the only time he can win big is when he has a last place schedule so make the sacrifice for next year. While I'm not rooting for them to lose, it won't break my heart if they do.

[The Bad Guy]

Originally Posted by ENDelt260

You really think two games is gonna make that much of a difference?

Good point.

I had a brain cramp and was using the old schedule formula.

But still, it could.

I like Vermeil, but it's pretty strange that he can only win when his teams suck balls the year before.

[KCWolfman]

There's some straight forward logic.


Look how it has helped the Royals over the last decade.

[Mr. Laz]

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

if this team finishes 8-8 all we will hear about is that injuries did us in and there won't be any changes made.

the chiefs are the "Kings" of PR spin and excuses


having priest miss a couple games is all the excuse they need for making zero change for next year. The viability of the excuses don't really matter.