Players you wish WEREN'T Chiefs... - Page 2

**BigMeatballDave** · GBM 8-12-15

Damon. Huard.

Thread closed.

**Buehler445** · 10-26-2007, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_CHIEFS_06

We'd be 1-6 at best with Croyle, Huard is a great leader, and gutsy as hell

First, Huard is gutsy. He has made some nice 4th quarter comebacks.

BUT you cannot reasonably say that we would be 1-6 with Croyle. A lot of the reason Huard has to be gutsy is because he throws checkdowns to Kris Wilson the entire ****ing first half. If Brodie could consistently move the chains like he has shown he can do, there would be no being down by 10 or 13 at half. There would be leads for KC at half and Brodie wouldn't have to stage a dramatic 4th quarter comeback, which I'm assuming you are insinuating he cannot do. Which is unjustified as well. From what I understand, he showed a lot of grit on a terrible Alabama team.

Huard has guts, but to suggest that the Chiefs would be 1-6 with Brodie is unfounded. Possible, yes, he could be the Chiefs version of suck, but to make that statement without seeing him is absurd.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

BUT YOU DON'T KNOW THAT...HE IS WAY BETTER THAN HOW HE LOOKED IN THE PRESEASON! WITH CROYLE WE'D BE 7-0.

let's go wit teh bombin brodie instead of downfield damon.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445

BUT you cannot reasonably say that we would be 1-6 with Croyle. A lot of the reason Huard has to be gutsy is because he throws checkdowns to Kris Wilson the entire ****ing first half. If Brodie could consistently move the chains like he has shown he can do, there would be no being down by 10 or 13 at half. There would be leads for KC at half and Brodie wouldn't have to stage a dramatic 4th quarter comeback, which I'm assuming you are insinuating he cannot do. Which is unjustified as well. From what I understand, he showed a lot of grit on a terrible Alabama team.

Do you think that the defense would play prevent the entire game the same way they have when bombin brodie got in for scrub time?

Hootie · 10-26-2007, 07:09 PM

BACKFOOT PANIC HEAVE HAS A QB RATING OF 104.1 IN GARBAGE TIME! THAT MEANS IF HE WAS OUR STARTING QB WE'D BE AVERAGING 30 PPG BECAUSE GARBAGE TIME IS A DIRECT CORRELATION TO 'PLAYING WHEN THE GAME ISN'T ALREADY OVER!'

txd60060 · 10-26-2007, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_CHIEFS_06

We'd be 1-6 at best with Croyle, Huard is a great leader, and gutsy as hell

Yeah... nobody falls into the fetal position as bravely as Huard.

:Scanlon:

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by txd60060

Yeah... nobody falls into the fetal position as bravely as Huard.

:Scanlon:

Post whore.

Mecca · 10-26-2007, 07:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Our record would be worse with Croyle. I mean seriously, you only have a 1 in 32 chance of winning the Super Bowl every year. Should we tank all the time for a bunch of high draft picks? This shit is getting old.

That 1-32 stuff doesn't fly...NE and Arizona don't have the same odds...

Hootie · 10-26-2007, 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

That 1-32 stuff doesn't fly...NE and Arizona don't have the same odds...

Man you totally missed his point...

He is saying ONLY ONE TEAM wins the Super Bowl every year, and of course we're not even on the same planet as New England, so he's saying every team that isn't on that planet (everyone besides the Colts) should just tank the season and worry about draft slot...because that's the 'logical' thing to do!

**Buehler445** · 10-26-2007, 07:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

Do you think that the defense would play prevent the entire game the same way they have when bombin brodie got in for scrub time?

I don't fully understand your post, but I'm going to take it to assume that Croyle played against a Jacksonville team that didn't care.

Yeah, they weren't coming after the QB anymore, but Huard also didn't do shit against the same defense. Croyle also moved the chains against Chicago until Bennett fumbled the ball. Croyle also moved the ball in preseason with shitty ass players when Huard could not. In the limited time we've seen Croyle, he has moved the chains, unlike Huard. If he can do that consistently, offensively we would be in a much different situation come halftime when we are always ****ing down 10 points.

**Buehler445** · 10-26-2007, 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

BACKFOOT PANIC HEAVE HAS A QB RATING OF 104.1 IN GARBAGE TIME! THAT MEANS IF HE WAS OUR STARTING QB WE'D BE AVERAGING 30 PPG BECAUSE GARBAGE TIME IS A DIRECT CORRELATION TO 'PLAYING WHEN THE GAME ISN'T ALREADY OVER!'

I didn't say that, asshat. All I said is that saying we would be 1-6 with Croyle is unjustified.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

Man you totally missed his point...

He is saying ONLY ONE TEAM wins the Super Bowl every year, and of course we're not even on the same planet as New England, so he's saying every team that isn't on that planet (everyone besides the Colts) should just tank the season and worry about draft slot...because that's the 'logical' thing to do!

Thank you.

Hootie · 10-26-2007, 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445

I didn't say that, asshat. All I said is that saying we would be 1-6 with Croyle is unjustified.

BRODIE CROYLE WAS JUST JOSHING AROUND IN THE PRESEASON...HE REALLY IS MUCH BETTER THAN THAT.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buehler445

I don't fully understand your post, but I'm going to take it to assume that Croyle played against a Jacksonville team that didn't care.

Yeah, they weren't coming after the QB anymore, but Huard also didn't do shit against the same defense. Croyle also moved the chains against Chicago until Bennett fumbled the ball. Croyle also moved the ball in preseason with shitty ass players when Huard could not. In the limited time we've seen Croyle, he has moved the chains, unlike Huard. If he can do that consistently, offensively we would be in a much different situation come halftime when we are always ****ing down 10 points.

If that was the case, he'd be starting. As far as Jax and Chicago go, the game was won, and the defense was soft. You combine a scheme that protects only the long ball with a we already won attitude and you have zero effort. You or I could move the Chiefs down the field in that circumstance.

**Mr. Flopnuts** · 10-26-2007, 07:20 PM

3 now. You should come and give your take more often post whore.

Edit:

I tried quoting you but you already deleted it.

txd60060 · 10-26-2007, 07:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

3 now. You should come and give your take more often post whore.

Edit:

I tried quoting you but you already deleted it.

WAY too much pressure being quoted.

:Scanlon:

10-26-2007, 06:44 PM
BigMeatballDave GBM 8-12-15 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dayton, Oh. Casino cash: $10052154	Players you wish WEREN'T Chiefs... Damon. Huard. Thread closed.
Posts: 59,997

10-26-2007, 07:09 PM	#19
Hootie Banned Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas, Texas Casino cash: $10004900	BACKFOOT PANIC HEAVE HAS A QB RATING OF 104.1 IN GARBAGE TIME! THAT MEANS IF HE WAS OUR STARTING QB WE'D BE AVERAGING 30 PPG BECAUSE GARBAGE TIME IS A DIRECT CORRELATION TO 'PLAYING WHEN THE GAME ISN'T ALREADY OVER!'
Posts: 56,356