Let the controversy begin - Page 2

Sam Hall · 08-15-2008, 05:13 PM

With the first pick in the 2009 NFL draft, Scott Wright, at least for now, thinks the Chiefs will select Matthew Stafford.

I'd like to see how Stafford plays without his left tackle. Remember, Scott Wright had Brian Brohm No. 1 overall at this time last year. He ended up correctly calling Jake Long to the Dolphins.

http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php

MIAdragon · 09-23-2008, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam Hall

I think the controversy is over for now: Stafford is the guy. The Chiefs can't win with the three quarterbacks they have. All three stink regardless of the poor offensive line.

I dont agree, it all starts with the Oline, everything.

Sam Hall · 09-23-2008, 11:10 AM

Another year with Croyle, Huard and Thigpen won't do any good. They might as well develop a quarterback and offensive line together.

The Chiefs don't want the No. 1 pick, but they need it.

SBK · 09-26-2008, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon

I dont agree, it all starts with the Oline, everything.

Where do you put Oher? We already have a LT....

And no matter how good your line is, without a QB you're not winning anything that matters.

MIAdragon · 09-26-2008, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Where do you put Oher? We already have a LT....

And no matter how good your line is, without a QB you're not winning anything that matters.

Slide Albert over.

Sam Hall · 09-26-2008, 07:57 AM

I don't think Mark Sanchez should go pro after this season. He needs more experience. He had some serious issues last night when under pressure. It also doesn't look like he can match Stafford's velocity.

It will be interesting to see the extent of Rey Maualuga's injury.

SBK · 09-26-2008, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MIAdragon

Slide Albert over.

Wrong answer. He's gonna be good.

**Tribal Warfare** · 09-26-2008, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Wrong answer. He's gonna be good.

He could be great at OG though. I don't get the "well he's good enough" excuse, if one has the ability to be great at another position while bringing in another player who's touted to be great from the start at the position the prior player was move from it would be logical to have the best players on the field.If that means that Albert moves back to the position where he's considered all-world at then so be it.

SBK · 09-26-2008, 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

He could be great at OG though. I don't get the "well he's good enough" excuse, if one has the ability to be great at another position while bringing in another player who's touted to be great from the start at the position the prior player was move from it would be logical to have the best players on the field.If that means that Albert moves back to the position where he's considered all-world at then so be it.

Albert is going to block the blindside for our next QB. He wasn't drafted to be a guard, he isn't a guard. He's a tackle.

**Tribal Warfare** · 09-26-2008, 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SBK

Albert is going to block the blindside for our next QB. He wasn't drafted to be a guard, he isn't a guard. He's a tackle.

So what? Like I said before if one can secure the line with all-world players than do it, especially if they are the BPA.

Sam Hall · 09-28-2008, 06:25 PM

This took another turn with today's win. The Chiefs aren't a lock for the top pick. I don't think St. Louis would draft Stafford, but Miami, San Francisco and Detroit might if given the chance.

A few more wins and I'll have to start a Maualuga-Laurinitis controversy thread

eazyb81 · 10-06-2008, 07:32 AM

I really don't see OT as a legit 1st round option for us after drafting Albert. We can use help on the right side at guard and tackle, but you don't draft those guys in the 1st round.

If we don't get a QB, I think the next best option would be a beastly DE like Greg Hardy. That guy has Merriman-type potential.

**Tribal Warfare** · 10-06-2008, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eazyb81

. We can use help on the right side at guard and tackle, but you don't draft those guys in the 1st round.

I've mentioned this before, if they have the ability to be perennial all-pros you pull the trigger.

**The Bad Guy** · 10-06-2008, 09:40 PM

By all means, let's keep ignoring the QB position. Who needs a QB to rebuild anyway?

(and no, I'm not advocating for just any QB).

**Tribal Warfare** · 10-06-2008, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

By all means, let's keep ignoring the QB position. Who needs a QB to rebuild anyway?

(and no, I'm not advocating for just any QB).

I'm advocating the BPA, of course you are being selective to what I said after the Georgia/Alabama game so please go on about how I'm so rigid with my player choices.

Sam Hall · 10-07-2008, 04:13 AM

Stafford and Bradford look pretty similar, but I see some differences. Stafford looks more like an NFL quarterback with his velocity. Something about Bradford's throwing motion doesn't remind me of an NFL quarterback. They're both accurate.

I don't think I would build my offense around a redshirt sophomore. However, I don't think Bradford will even declare for this year's draft.

08-15-2008, 05:13 PM
Sam Hall UNSTOPPABLE Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KC area Casino cash: $9895185	Let the controversy begin With the first pick in the 2009 NFL draft, Scott Wright, at least for now, thinks the Chiefs will select Matthew Stafford. I'd like to see how Stafford plays without his left tackle. Remember, Scott Wright had Brian Brohm No. 1 overall at this time last year. He ended up correctly calling Jake Long to the Dolphins. http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php
Posts: 8,137

09-23-2008, 11:10 AM	#17
Sam Hall UNSTOPPABLE Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KC area Casino cash: $9895185	Another year with Croyle, Huard and Thigpen won't do any good. They might as well develop a quarterback and offensive line together. The Chiefs don't want the No. 1 pick, but they need it. __________________ Last edited by Sam Hall; 09-24-2008 at 10:02 PM..
Posts: 8,137

09-26-2008, 07:57 AM	#20
Sam Hall UNSTOPPABLE Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KC area Casino cash: $9895185	I don't think Mark Sanchez should go pro after this season. He needs more experience. He had some serious issues last night when under pressure. It also doesn't look like he can match Stafford's velocity. It will be interesting to see the extent of Rey Maualuga's injury. __________________
Posts: 8,137

09-28-2008, 06:25 PM	#25
Sam Hall UNSTOPPABLE Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KC area Casino cash: $9895185	This took another turn with today's win. The Chiefs aren't a lock for the top pick. I don't think St. Louis would draft Stafford, but Miami, San Francisco and Detroit might if given the chance. A few more wins and I'll have to start a Maualuga-Laurinitis controversy thread __________________
Posts: 8,137

10-06-2008, 07:32 AM	#26
eazyb81 The Illuminati Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: the road less traveled Casino cash: $9984900	I really don't see OT as a legit 1st round option for us after drafting Albert. We can use help on the right side at guard and tackle, but you don't draft those guys in the 1st round. If we don't get a QB, I think the next best option would be a beastly DE like Greg Hardy. That guy has Merriman-type potential.
Posts: 12,033

10-06-2008, 09:40 PM	#28
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9283645	By all means, let's keep ignoring the QB position. Who needs a QB to rebuild anyway? (and no, I'm not advocating for just any QB). __________________
Posts: 23,216

10-07-2008, 04:13 AM	#30
Sam Hall UNSTOPPABLE Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: KC area Casino cash: $9895185	Stafford and Bradford look pretty similar, but I see some differences. Stafford looks more like an NFL quarterback with his velocity. Something about Bradford's throwing motion doesn't remind me of an NFL quarterback. They're both accurate. I don't think I would build my offense around a redshirt sophomore. However, I don't think Bradford will even declare for this year's draft. __________________
Posts: 8,137