Chiefs Our defense, if we drafted Ansah and Nico Johnson. - Page 2

Direckshun · 03-16-2013, 11:04 AM

We would be given an insane amount of different fronts we could line up in. We could have heavy fronts, small fronts, dimes, nickels, goal lines... and always be lining up exceptional talent everywhere.

Now for our purposes, I assumed we drafted Ezekiel Ansah out of BYU, who the Chiefs clearly love. And I assume they draft Nico Johnson, a big, Belcher-type out of Alabama in the 3rd or fourth round.

Look how awesome this is.

Ladies and gentleman, this is why it's a good idea to stack your ****ing defense.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-16-2013, 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

It'd be one thing if I'm taking him out for Andy Studebaker, but I'm not. I'm taking him out for ****ing Ezekial Ansah.

Who played in a weak conference and played sporadically before his senior season.

This is just not a good selection for the Chiefs defense.

Rasputin · 03-16-2013, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

I'm sorry, that is just plain dumb to say that Jerrel Powe, a sixth rounder who's shown nothing to date, should play before Dontari Poe, who showed pressure, athleticism and most of all endurance.

Dumb, dumb, dumb.

I didn't mean to say more than Dontari Poe, but they don't need Poe in for every down. Rotate Powe in there and get something out of him even if it's in spurts. We need to generate a push up the middle and collapse the pocket Powe has the power to do that. He is inexperienced and a sixth round I get that. Give him some more playing time and relieve Poe from every down.

jd1020 · 03-16-2013, 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

I didn't mean to say more than Dontari Poe, but they don't need Poe in for every down. Rotate Powe in there and get something out of him even if it's in spurts. We need to generate a push up the middle and collapse the pocket Powe has the power to do that. He is inexperienced and a sixth round I get that. Give him some more playing time and relieve Poe from every down.

Rotate Powe? GTFO

Powe is good for less than a handful of snaps just to give Poe a breather. Otherwise, ride that bench Powe.

Rasputin · 03-16-2013, 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Rotate Powe? GTFO

Powe is good for less than a handful of snaps just to give Poe a breather. Otherwise, ride that bench Powe.

Oh bull shit Powe is better than you guys are giving him credit for he just needs to get and make the best of his opportunities. I think he can serve well if this coaching change pushes the right buttons with him.

jd1020 · 03-16-2013, 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

Oh bull shit Powe is better than you guys are giving him credit for he just needs to get and make the best of his opportunities. I think he can serve well if this coaching change pushes the right buttons with him.

Poe > Powe.

No one ****ing cares about your man love for Powe.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-16-2013, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

Oh bull shit Powe is better than you guys are giving him credit for he just needs to get and make the best of his opportunities. I think he can serve well if this coaching change pushes the right buttons with him.

Once again, this time with feeling:

Rasputin · 03-16-2013, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

Poe > Powe.

No one ****ing cares about your man love for Powe.

I didn't say Powe was better than Poe. I said I want to see Powe play more and see less of Poe. I know Poe is and should be the starting NT. It's not dumb at all to give a guy an opportunity with playing time.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-16-2013, 12:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

I didn't say Powe was better than Poe. I said I want to see Powe play more and see less of Poe. I know Poe is and should be the starting NT. It's not dumb at all to give a guy an opportunity with playing time.

No, no, no, no.

We should be seeing as much of Poe as possible, not less. He's a freak and has an amazing amount of endurance and stamina for a man his size.

Wear him the **** out.

milkman · 03-16-2013, 12:56 PM

To me, the reason Powe rarely saw the field under Romeo was that he lacked the discipline to maintain his assignment in Romeo's defense.

The rare times he did see the field, he was consistently trying to shoot gaps, rather than eating space.

He did show a quick burst with his first step, and got some penetratin on a handful of plays.

I think he will turn out to be a nice rotational player in this defense.

jd1020 · 03-16-2013, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Tattoo

I didn't say Powe was better than Poe. I said I want to see Powe play more and see less of Poe. I know Poe is and should be the starting NT. It's not dumb at all to give a guy an opportunity with playing time.

I think it's time the Patriots start to think about rotating in Mallett to get him some playing time.

milkman · 03-16-2013, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

I think it's time the Patriots start to think about rotating in Mallett to get him some playing time.

That is just a stupid ****ing post.

**DaneMcCloud** · 03-16-2013, 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

To me, the reason Powe rarely saw the field under Romeo was that he lacked the discipline to maintain his assignment in Romeo's defense.

The rare times he did see the field, he was consistently trying to shoot gaps, rather than eating space.

He did show a quick burst with his first step, and got some penetratin on a handful of plays.

I think he will turn out to be a nice rotational player in this defense.

He may and he may not. But you don't pull a beast like Poe just to put Powe on the field for no apparent reason.

NJChiefsFan · 03-16-2013, 01:01 PM

Are we talking about Ansah at 1.1? If we take a guy at 1.1 I would like him to play in a majority of the defense snaps, which isn't happening in the scenario you are putting together here.

jd1020 · 03-16-2013, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman

That is just a stupid ****ing post.

So is replacing Poe with Powe just to get Powe playing time.

milkman · 03-16-2013, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

He may and he may not. But you don't pull a beast like Poe just to put Powe on the field for no apparent reason.

Every NFL team tries to rotate D-Lineman to keep the starters fresh.

03-16-2013, 11:04 AM
Direckshun __ Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Springpatch Casino cash: $2033447	Our defense, if we drafted Ansah and Nico Johnson. We would be given an insane amount of different fronts we could line up in. We could have heavy fronts, small fronts, dimes, nickels, goal lines... and always be lining up exceptional talent everywhere. Now for our purposes, I assumed we drafted Ezekiel Ansah out of BYU, who the Chiefs clearly love. And I assume they draft Nico Johnson, a big, Belcher-type out of Alabama in the 3rd or fourth round. Look how awesome this is. Ladies and gentleman, this is why it's a good idea to stack your ****ing defense.
Posts: 59,693

03-16-2013, 12:56 PM	#24
milkman Dumbass! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Leading the Marty bashing Casino cash: $10029395	To me, the reason Powe rarely saw the field under Romeo was that he lacked the discipline to maintain his assignment in Romeo's defense. The rare times he did see the field, he was consistently trying to shoot gaps, rather than eating space. He did show a quick burst with his first step, and got some penetratin on a handful of plays. I think he will turn out to be a nice rotational player in this defense. __________________
Posts: 70,769

03-16-2013, 01:01 PM	#28
NJChiefsFan I've Made a Huge Mistake Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: NJ Casino cash: $4500423	Are we talking about Ansah at 1.1? If we take a guy at 1.1 I would like him to play in a majority of the defense snaps, which isn't happening in the scenario you are putting together here.
Posts: 12,495