|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2013
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Didn't Pioli do something similar with Carr? It seems like we sort of got screwed by that. There was speculation it pissed him off because he didn't get a real deal. After he signed that deal right before training camp it seemed like he was done negotiating. It could back fire. It almost seems like something teams do to players they don't plan keeping long term. I could be way off here. |
|
Posts: 164
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
XBOX GT MAVS ACE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Wisconsin
Casino cash: $10019303
|
Question Sir. You cut gray, specifically cut gray, and he made your depth chart.
I really love this mock. And yes, Riley Cooper, is an unrestricted free agent by the way. Kudos on Ebron. We all know how I feel about his ass. http://articles.philly.com/2014-01-0...per-nate-allen
__________________
Resident Browns fan I’m not here to argue about Alex Smith. Fastest Ignore user on CP |
Posts: 18,683
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2065047
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Teams ACE!!!
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Where the hell is SNR
Casino cash: $-1574792
|
Is Sam going to be available in the 4th round? That seems like a bit of a stretch.
|
Posts: 93,456
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Fish are scared of me
Join Date: Nov 2001
Casino cash: $-1559523
|
I really don't understand why so many don't want McCluster back.
He had a great year as a punt return specialist and I think he'll be even better next year. |
Posts: 40,649
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $-1775912
|
Quote:
I think he will probably get more than that from somebody, though. |
|
Posts: 47,906
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Casino cash: $10005813
|
For me this has an easy answer. Dexter made 1.4 this year and will want a raise. That is fine but I can't see paying what he will be asking for to a guy whose only real contribution is as a punt returner. I'm not saying anything except this team will need more for the money he will want. I also don't like that Dexter seems to not break tackles.
__________________
Stop corporate Greed!!!!! |
Posts: 346
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1805503
|
Quote:
I don't mind overpaying the guy. Of course, I don't want to break the bank either. Dex is looking good as a hands receiver who is also excellent at returning punts. Even if he gets demoted to #4 WR, he could play a really valuable role for this team. |
|
Posts: 51,678
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
Casino cash: $-222225
|
If we're wanting more sack production from the ends, I'm not sure what Hood gives us that Jackson cant.
Hoods best year is 3, Jackson had 4 this year. Not saying I want to keep Jackson, just saying I want a better pass rush from our ends. I definitely like the offense to defense ratio in your mock. |
Posts: 98,536
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Kindness in words...
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Zion
Casino cash: $10025483
|
Quote:
His flexibility on offense and special teams provides a lot of options. Those options might not be "A or B", but he can find a spot all over the field. As well, as stated above, he's turned out to be a quality route runner with decent hands. And I don't think he'll want exorbitant amounts of money. I also like the concept of Riley Cooper as a free agent. Guy can catch a ball. |
|
Posts: 15,450
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $-1635266
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Posts: 60,031
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1805503
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 51,678
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $-1775912
|
Also, pest weren't you giving me shit about talking up the tight end class the other day as a direction we should take? Something about "what do you do with McGrath? Cut him?...maybe I just misunderstood.
Obviously, I think Ebron would be a phenomenal pick and if he is gone when we pick, there are two other tight ends I'd e ok with selecting at that point. |
Posts: 47,906
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Most Valuable Villain
Join Date: Dec 2006
Casino cash: $2065047
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 92,316
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
SuperBowl or bust
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: BF Iowa
Casino cash: $-1775912
|
As far as McGrath and Fasano go, neither guy is anything special. Fasano was a one step forward, two steps back guy and McGrath is JAG.
I am probably as high on Kelce as anyone on this board (I reported on him while at camp multiple times and the guy looked like a difference maker at the position) ...but not many players that lose their first year to injury ever e one anything special. Hopefully, Kelce becomes an outlier to that. If we are able to go into the season with Kelce and Ebron/Amaro or Jenkins, the receivers we have are probably good enough. I know this is gonna seem far fetched, but I think a trio of Kelce-Ebron-McGrath/Fasano would be top 5 in the league as a position group. |
Posts: 47,906
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|