|
|
View Poll Results: Who was better? | |||
The 2013 Chiefs who were 6-0. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
14 | 21.21% |
The 2014 Chiefs who are 3-3. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
43 | 65.15% |
Rausch shall go away, or be taunted a second time. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0 | 0% |
Direckshun's whore of a mother. Always a relevant answer. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 | 13.64% |
Voters: 66. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
"THEY'RE STILL SHITTY"!
Sankyou.
__________________
1. Merciless, severe. 2. Given freely and generously. 100% refusal to overrate 20 year Head Coaches with ZERO ****ing rings as a Head Coach. CP's Official Professor of 'Dem Blues for 2019/2020! |
Posts: 77,135
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
TimeForWasp |
This message has been deleted by TimeForWasp.
Reason: sorry Didn't read the op right
|
![]() |
#17 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-725936
|
Didn't beat a single good team last year. Already beat 3 this year and were a direkshuns but hair away from beating 2 more on the road.
|
Posts: 84,240
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
MVP
Join Date: Jan 2001
Casino cash: $7764831
|
But we lost 6 starters!
|
Posts: 11,478
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
You Sweetie!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $2021206219
![]() |
did Ty Law retire a Chief? no srsly...??
|
Posts: 71,691
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Emporer of Mongo
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milky Way
Casino cash: $-642444
|
Anyone who says last year's team is better doesn't know shit about the chiefs
__________________
---- 2018 Adopt-A-Chief : Chris Conley 2017 Adopt-A-Chief : FRANK ZOMBO Click here-->***The Holy Chiefsplanet Lexicon **** |
Posts: 46,212
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Emporer of Mongo
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Milky Way
Casino cash: $-642444
|
About the ONLY way this team is worse is pass protection...
And turnover ratio maybe? So far, everything else is better or at least not worse.
__________________
---- 2018 Adopt-A-Chief : Chris Conley 2017 Adopt-A-Chief : FRANK ZOMBO Click here-->***The Holy Chiefsplanet Lexicon **** |
Posts: 46,212
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver
Casino cash: $7406013
|
I feel like this year's team has far better balance than last. We are not as explosive on defense or ST, but have hung tough against some really good QBs. We are not relying on a few big plays to win games, but are playing fairly consistent ball-control offense. I really love the third-down offense this year more than anything else. If we can keep converting at this rate we will be a very tough team down the stretch.
|
Posts: 2,267
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
Casino cash: $-182225
|
I dont see how anyone could vote for 2013.
The strength of schedule was much weaker. Our depth is waaay better this year in most spots. Sutton really seems to have a much better handle on the defense this year, while we're not getting as many turnovers, we're also not giving up as many big plays. |
Posts: 98,501
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-725936
|
Turnovers are random.
|
Posts: 84,240
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
pie is never free
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: the drivers seat
Casino cash: $-182225
|
I mostly agree with that, but I do think you can increase your chances for interceptions with aggressive blitzing, forcing the QB into hurried throws.
Of course the problem with that is that it also increases your chances to get burned for a big play... I like that Sutton isnt blitzing as much, we've definitely given up fewer big plays this year all while playing against much better QB's than last year. |
Posts: 98,501
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $-1640389
|
Easily 2014 best 3rd down team in the league. Few plays of 20+ yards given up.
This team is really building. I wish I could see what it looks like in 2 years.
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley |
Posts: 52,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $800478
|
|
Posts: 297,446
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $-1640389
|
I'm okay with this. Kelce is better than Bowe and Davis isn't too bad himself. DAT looks a nice toy on offense and our GM is showing us he can draft quality players.
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley |
Posts: 52,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $-725936
|
Bowe is averaging 15 yards per catch. He needs more tsrgets. Alot more. Will only improve the passing game
|
Posts: 84,240
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Andy Reid Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2012
Casino cash: $-1640389
|
Depends. Bowe is good for at least one critical drop a game. Double edged sword on this issue
__________________
Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley |
Posts: 52,221
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|