***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Kiimo]

Wow. pic.twitter.com/CKhfIKr3rh

— B/R Gridiron (@brgridiron) May 19, 2020

lol if any of you have tried to run with a mask on it is like impossible

[SupDock]

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED

Maybe because the news and the doomsday headlines have made people this way now. I hope I’m not coming across as argumentative towards you, I’m just tired of talking to people who assume that the faster we get a vaccine for this thing the better. You’re not really even saying that, but you’re the only one quoting me and carrying on the conversation so I’m taking my frustrations out on you.

I think most health care workers are rooting for an antibody over a rushed vaccine at this point. A good antibody drug could take the fatality rate down to levels that a vaccine might not even be required anymore in a perfect world. I know that’s definitely what I’m hoping for.

A vaccine and an antibody would be nice. I would much rather have the vaccine and not be in a position to need antibody therapy.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Wow. pic.twitter.com/CKhfIKr3rh

— B/R Gridiron (@brgridiron) May 19, 2020

lol if any of you have tried to run with a mask on it is like impossible

Dude breaks away and halfway to the zone he passes out.

[petegz28]

New York’s coronavirus outbreak is back to where it started, Gov. Andrew Cuomo says

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/19/new-...uomo-says.html

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by SupDock

A vaccine and an antibody would be nice. I would much rather have the vaccine and not be in a position to need antibody therapy.

This .

[Kiimo]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Dude breaks away and halfway to the zone he passes out.

Yeah I'm reminded of that girl that was running with a mask on and got a collapsed lung from inhaling too hard on something designed to prevent airflow.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi

Yeah I'm reminded of that girl that was running with a mask on and got a collapsed lung from inhaling too hard on something designed to prevent airflow.

Will it be considered cheating if as you are running you pull your mask down to get some air?

[POND_OF_RED]

Originally Posted by Monticore

I agree , what is the likelihood of having an antibody drug vs a vaccine, I haven't looked it up so I really don't have a clue on the success rates on those.

It’s obviously way too early to tell. There have been a couple of good antibody tests with really good results. Particularly Sorrento’s STI-1499 but they aren’t to human trials yet so it’s way too early to get too excited about it. I know people on this board don’t trust anything out of China but I read this article today with some promising stuff as well.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/medical...ic-vaccine.amp

[loochy]

Originally Posted by petegz28

New York’s coronavirus outbreak is back to where it started, Gov. Andrew Cuomo says

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/19/new-...uomo-says.html

Congrats to him, he can read numbers from a chart. I'm glad he's around to tell us that.

[POND_OF_RED]

Originally Posted by SupDock

A vaccine and an antibody would be nice. I would much rather have the vaccine and not be in a position to need antibody therapy.

As long as they’re not mandatory in the next 20 years I have no issues with the vaccines.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Will it be considered cheating if as you are running you pull your mask down to get some air?

You'll have guys poking extra holes in their masks or taking out the filter media or something...there WILL be cheating methods if they do this.

[Kiimo]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Will it be considered cheating if as you are running you pull your mask down to get some air?

taunting

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by POND_OF_RED

It’s obviously way too early to tell. There have been a couple of good antibody tests with really good results. Particularly Sorrento’s STI-1499 but they aren’t to human trials yet so it’s way too early to get too excited about it. I know people on this board don’t trust anything out of China but I read this article today with some promising stuff as well.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/medical...ic-vaccine.amp

Both are still early but I assume other are looking into it, it is hard to believe we have been dealing with this for only 6 months (it is an estimate BR) it feels like years.

[TLO]

St. Joe got some more tests back today.

Out of 1351 completed, 23 came back positive.

242 still pending.

Can we interpret anything from this?

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by TLO

St. Joe got some more tests back today.

Out of 1351 completed, 23 came back positive.

242 still pending.

Can we interpret anything from this?

Probably not totally random as it was voluntary, but it seems like the virus is less prevalent in the population than some think. At least in the Midwest.