***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by petegz28

And not only did you not read it it, you went off about it then chastised me for not being open to evidence and data

That's classic projection, bro.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Here ya go:

https://wwwn.cdc.gov/dcs/ContactUs/Form

[petegz28]

And there is actually data showing there can be side effects to wearing masks but that's not convenient to your narrative.

[Redbled]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

It's not like you're paying attention to data, so why should someone waste their time treating you like you're arguing in good faith?

You sat there and bitched endlessly about small businesses not being able to open up while arguing against procedures that will expedite their ability to open up--it's pretty clear you don't give a shit about those businesses--it was just a way for you to score some partisan points.

If someone doesn't want to wear a mask at this point it's out of selfishness, ignorance, stupidity, or a combination thereof. There are no side effects to wearing a mask.

I'm not going to apologize for having nothing but contempt for someone that hypocritical.

100 percent this. But you can never control stupid.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Lzen

I go over to DC every so often. Not saying the mods care about their political leanings in this thread but you can't tell me it's anywhere close to 90% right leaning people.

I don't go over there enough to really give a number, it certainly leans more right than left though.

[lewdog]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Here ya go:

https://wwwn.cdc.gov/dcs/ContactUs/Form

**** the CDC!

The article from my recent Ladies Home Journal is calling bullshit!

/Pete

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by lewdog

Do you understand what asymptomatic means?

I just feel we need to start somewhere with you.

asymptomwho? sounds like fake news to me.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Lzen

I go over to DC every so often. Not saying the mods care about their political leanings in this thread but you can't tell me it's anywhere close to 90% right leaning people.

Since you seem to be here for actual discussion, can you help me understand why masks have become a left/right issue? I honestly don't understand it. Is it just a feeling like people shouldn't have to follow government regulations broadly? Lack of trust in science? Or is there something more to it that I'm missing?

[jd1020]

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

If someone doesn't want to wear a mask at this point it's out of selfishness, ignorance, stupidity, or a combination thereof. There are no side effects to wearing a mask.

I have this side effect where the second I put on a mask my glasses instantly fog up and I cant see shit with them on and I cant see shit with them off so I choose not to wear one. I also realize that its an issue to a lot of people so I do all of my store shopping just before closing when there's maybe like 5 people in the store and the only checkout isles open are the self checkout and I have yet to get stopped for not wearing one.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by DaFace

I have no symptoms and wear it everywhere (inside) now. I'll do so until public health experts deem that it's no longer necessary.

That is the most reasonable way to handle this, I guess it makes to much sense.

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Here ya go:



https://wwwn.cdc.gov/dcs/ContactUs/Form

Here I go what? You are just proving my point over and over.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[Redbled]

Originally Posted by petegz28

And not only did you not read it it, you went off about it then chastised me for not being open to evidence and data

That's classic projection, bro.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Why would anyone take the time to read an article posted by a person with such little credibility on a topic?

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by Mecca

I don't go over there enough to really give a number, it certainly leans more right than left though.

It does lean right but not nearly as much as you think.

[limested]

Setup a fence around a basketball goal that has holes the size of a beachball. Try to shoot basket now. Does it 100% prevent you from making baskets? No. Does it make it more difficult to make them? Yes

Same principle of wearing the mask. Does it prevent the spread 100% No, but it does make it more difficult as even though the droplets may be small enough to get through there is still a high chance of it hitting the fibers and not passing through.

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by jd1020

I have this side effect where the second I put on a mask my glasses instantly fog up and I cant see shit with them on and I cant see shit with them off so I choose not to wear one. I also realize that its an issue to a lot of people so I do all of my store shopping just before closing when there's maybe like 5 people in the store and I have yet to get stopped for not wearing one.

It doesn't entirely take care of it, but washing your glasses with dish soap can help prevent fogging a little bit. You can also find anti-fog sprays.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by DaFace

Since you seem to be here for actual discussion, can you help me understand why masks have become a left/right issue? I honestly don't understand it. Is it just a feeling like people shouldn't have to follow government regulations broadly? Lack of trust in science? Or is there something more to it that I'm missing?

My opinion is because everything is a left right issue now....

In reality I think it comes back to that, the section of people that don't want to wear them take it to that level of the pussification of America, the American male mainly. That it's viewed as not tough and like being a coward.

I could be off base but I think it has something to do with that, that and the desire to not do what you're told and somehow "stick it to the man"