***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Donger

Who are they?

You know exactly who I'm talking about.

[Merde Furieux]

Hit the showers, Dung.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

You know exactly who I'm talking about.

Monticore?

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

Projection,

Never have stated that period. I just defend the rights of those who choose not to.

Because regardless how I feel about it, it is their ****ing right to not do so. Just like its your right to not own a gun, etc.

But having said all that, it doesn't change the fact that you are a beta.

Seem hung on this beta label did lewdog leave you off of his alpha list or something.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Merde Furieux

There you go, lying again.

One more mother****in time...

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipelin...enough-already

Condensed version

"96,032 patients were registered in these hospitals with the coronavirus during the study period (December 20, 2019 to April 14, 2020); this is a large data set. The mean age of the patients was just under 54 years, 54/46 male/female. 14,888 of them were in the treatment sets defined above: 1868 got straight chloroquine, 3783 got chloroquine with a macrolide, 3016 received hydroxychloroquine by itself, and another 6221 got HCQ with a macrolide). That leaves 81,144 patients as a control group getting other standard of care. Let’s note at the start that the authors controlled for a number of confounding factors (such as age, sex, race or ethnicity, body-mass index, cardiovascular disease and risk factors, diabetes, lung disease, smoking, immunosuppressed condition, and overall disease severity). How’d it go?"

"Judge for yourself. The mortality in the control group was 9.3%. The mortality in the chloroquine group was 16.4%. The mortality in the chloroquine plus macrolide group was 22.2%. The mortality in the hydroxychloroquine group was 18%. And the mortality in the hydroxychloroquine plus macrolide group was 23.8%."

"Let’s look at cardiac arrhythmia. The 0.3% of the control group developed new arrhythmias during their hospitalization. But 4.3% of the chloroquine treatment group did. And 6.5% of the chloroquine plus macrolide group. As did 6.1% of the hydroxychloroquine group. And 8.1% of the hydroxychlorquine plus macrolide group."

If you wanna take that shit by all means, go ahead.

[Merde Furieux]

Originally Posted by Mecca

One more mother****in time...

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipelin...enough-already

Condensed version

"96,032 patients were registered in these hospitals with the coronavirus during the study period (December 20, 2019 to April 14, 2020); this is a large data set. The mean age of the patients was just under 54 years, 54/46 male/female. 14,888 of them were in the treatment sets defined above: 1868 got straight chloroquine, 3783 got chloroquine with a macrolide, 3016 received hydroxychloroquine by itself, and another 6221 got HCQ with a macrolide). That leaves 81,144 patients as a control group getting other standard of care. Let’s note at the start that the authors controlled for a number of confounding factors (such as age, sex, race or ethnicity, body-mass index, cardiovascular disease and risk factors, diabetes, lung disease, smoking, immunosuppressed condition, and overall disease severity). How’d it go?"

"Judge for yourself. The mortality in the control group was 9.3%. The mortality in the chloroquine group was 16.4%. The mortality in the chloroquine plus macrolide group was 22.2%. The mortality in the hydroxychloroquine group was 18%. And the mortality in the hydroxychloroquine plus macrolide group was 23.8%."

"Let’s look at cardiac arrhythmia. The 0.3% of the control group developed new arrhythmias during their hospitalization. But 4.3% of the chloroquine treatment group did. And 6.5% of the chloroquine plus macrolide group. As did 6.1% of the hydroxychloroquine group. And 8.1% of the hydroxychlorquine plus macrolide group."

If you wanna take that shit by all means, go ahead.

Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see the word "Zinc" in there.

[ARROW2]

Originally Posted by Gravedigger

Heart Disease isn’t transferable by droplets from someone else’s breath.
Cancer isn’t transferable by droplets from someone else’s breath.
The vast majority of your vague Medical mistakes argument aren’t transferable from someone else’s breath and if they are the doctors and nurses wear masks to mitigate the possibility.
Alzheimer’s isn’t transferable from someone else’s breath.
Diabetes isn’t transferable from someone else’s breath.

The majority of the arguments you put forth are based on bad personal decisions both in the long term and short term. But I guess if you don’t try to avoid them then you wouldn’t try to avoid COVID as well, the difference is you’re just playing Russian roulette with your own life when it comes to all the deflections you presented, with COVID you’re forcing others to play your game, and you don’t seem to mind one bit.

Also the Flu claimed roughly 80000 lives in 2018, so COVID already beat that in three months with all this social distancing. I’m sure you can understand that at least some of those 80000 deaths could have been mitigated if the deceased would’ve gotten a flu shot. Problem with COVID is we don’t have a vaccine for people to ignore, but once we have an effective vaccine then your argument will probably have the validity you want it to.

The so-called Covid deaths have been labeled as the cause of death for things such as heart attacks and other pre-existing conditions, including simply OLD AGE....."108 year old died of Covid" GTFOOH!! That is FACT. They have been encouraged to label the cause of death as much as possible as covid, even without a test and other obvious conditions that brought the person to the hospital in the first place. Additionally, there is a $ incentive to do so, along with vents.....But hey, carry on. Bottom line, people die every second of the day, they are just labeling a lot of those as covid and stuffing every one of them down your throat all day every day. Even still, the 95+% survival rate never gets mentioned. If it was so easy to catch in the air, then who would be walking around? What about your eyes? The mask won't save you, especially if you have been eating pork and smokiing for 60 years, while walking around diabetic. Your IMMUNE SYSTEM exists for a REASON. the masks also cut down on your own oxygen intake. I will wear it where required but not constantly for no good reason, especially in 90+ degree weather.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by BleedingRed

Projection,

Never have stated that period. I just defend the rights of those who choose not to.

Because regardless how I feel about it, it is their ****ing right to not do so. Just like its your right to not own a gun, etc.

But having said all that, it doesn't change the fact that you are a beta.

Yes, you've made it abundantly clear that you're a selfish piece of trash who doesn't care about his fellow Americans. Have fun exercising that right.

[Merde Furieux]

It's all my fault 5,000 nursing home residents died after Cuomo forced infected people into those nursing homes. I'm thorry, Dung.

[jdubya]

Originally Posted by Donger

Yes, you've made it abundantly clear that you're a selfish piece of trash who doesn't care about his fellow Americans. Have fun exercising that right.

If one wears a mask does that mean they "care" and deserve a big air hug?

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Donger

Monticore?

You're Dongering me.

Apparently you missed this post from last night.

https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost.php?p=14989535

[Donger]

Originally Posted by jdubya

If one wears a mask does that mean they "care" and deserve a big air hug?

More than this piece of trash?

People retired from the work force? I don't ****ing care about those people

Yes, clearly.

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

You're Dongering me.

Apparently you missed this post from last night.

https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showpost.php?p=14989535

Yes, I did.

How do you know they weren't Americans?

[Bugeater]

Originally Posted by Donger

Yes, I did.

How do you know they weren't Americans?

Not speaking English is the biggest clue....and that isn't the first time I've ran into that issue...

[Donger]

Originally Posted by Bugeater

Not speaking English is the biggest clue....

So you don't know.