Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck.

[Hammock Parties]

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by buddha

There is so much suck in this thread...246 page of guys wanting to be right more than wanting the Chiefs to win.

Isn't it just easier to admit that Alex is better than you thought he'd be? Nobody claimed he'd be Dan Marino, but he's 2-0.

When he proves he's more than who I think he is, I'll happily admit it. He's better than 2012 Cassel, but Tyler Palko wouldn't have been much worse. Beating a terrible team and a mediocre team doesn't prove he's any better than 2010 Cassel, even though there are obviously improvements when it comes to pocket awareness and avoiding a pass rush.

The whole reason guys like Cassel and Smith get starts is that the NFL is incredibly mediocre. FFS, Tim Tebow has won as many playoff games as Alex Smith... winning 8-10 games per season isn't some huge accomplishment in this league, and if that's what you want out of a quarterback, then you should be thrilled, since that's what you'll get. But, everyone who's a "Smith hater" in this thread is looking beyond the first round of the playoffs.

Even one of his biggest 49ers fans said last night that Smith is probably only around to get the Chiefs back to mediocrity so he can then mentor a franchise QB, which would be great.... and if Smith does it himself, even better.... but, not saying the Chiefs have a real QB who's a huge upgrade from any other retread after 2 wins isn't 'hating', it's simply remembering that the Chiefs have been doing this for four decades with no results.

[Sandy Vagina]

JFC... such misery.

[Halfcan]

Alex has kicked ass. He plays with a lot of heart and zero turnovers unlike his replacement in San Fran who has nearly as many turnovers as quarters of football.

He lead the team in rushing yesterday and took what the D offered. This thread needs to be put out its misery.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by Cephalic Trauma

So you're saying he's somewhere between Cassel and Peyton... Thanks for pointing that seemingly elusive concept out to me.

Oh quiet you. It just hit me all at once how great it is to not have a suck QB.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by Halfcan

Alex has kicked ass. He plays with a lot of heart and zero turnovers unlike his replacement in San Fran who has nearly as many turnovers as quarters of football.

He lead the team in rushing yesterday and took what the D offered. This thread needs to be put out its misery.

Kaepernick threw for over 400 yards vs the Packers because that's what you have to do when you're playing Aaron Rodgers, and he probably would have needed another 300 last night. Comparing games vs potential NFC championship game participants, against what any QB has to do to beat Jacksonville or Dallas, is kind of ridiculous.

[L.A. Chieffan]

San Fran messed up and got rid of the wrong qb. in your face harbaugh and sf fans hahahahah!

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Kaepernick threw for over 400 yards vs the Packers because that's what you have to do when you're playing Aaron Rodgers, and he probably would have needed another 300 last night. Comparing games vs potential NFC championship game participants, against what any QB has to do to beat Jacksonville or Dallas, is kind of ridiculous.

Uhm... like no and stuff. You do not. SF beat GB last season with Alex throwing a brutally efficient 20/26 passes for 211 yards.

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan

San Fran messed up and got rid of the wrong qb. in your face harbaugh and sf fans hahahahah!

Too early to be saying all that, now. JFC.

[Cephalic Trauma]

Originally Posted by loochy

Oh quiet you. It just hit me all at once how great it is to not have a suck QB.

I knew what you meant, but I never pass up the opportunity to be an ass.

[9er guy]

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Uhm... like no and stuff. You do not. SF beat GB last season with Alex throwing a brutally efficient 20/26 passes for 211 yards.

Beating A-Rodg is about getting pressure and turnovers.

We've done it all three times we've beat them, regardless of who the QB is.

[Sandy Vagina]

Originally Posted by 9er guy

Beating A-Rodg is about getting pressure and turnovers.

We've done it all three times we've beat them, regardless of who the QB is.

Well that is certainly one way to look at it in efforts to deflect appreciation from the offense. Well done!

[L.A. Chieffan]

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Too early to be saying all that, now. JFC.

2-0
1-1

[9er guy]

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Well that is certainly one way to look at it in efforts to deflect appreciation from the offense. Well done!

LOL.......ok

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Uhm... like no and stuff. You do not. SF beat GB last season with Alex throwing a brutally efficient 20/26 passes for 211 yards.

Well, I meant he needed to last week, obviously... of course not every victory over Aaron Rodgers has included an opposing QB passing for 400+ yards. You have to be aggressive, throw down field, and take chances when the other team doing the same thing with success, especially when you're running for 2.6 ypc as they did last week. Do you think Alex Smith would have out-gunned Rodgers last week?

[bishop_74]

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead

And throw down the field less, and with less accuracy. And be shitty on third down.

Jesus.