Motion to temporarily BAN... - Page 3

DenverChief · 04-21-2005, 11:16 PM

Anyone who starts another thread with an article written by Nick Athan...seriously this guy spews crap and I could care less to read it, we have already established his takes are complete

and I think it clutters the front page with crap ...poll forthcoming....or start a Athan forum where those that

on his articles can go

Logical · 04-21-2005, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C-Mac

Oh like.....
*WARNING* Viewer Discretion is Advised!"

Heck we could use this on tons of threads!

I don't recall you being such a jackass. WTF do you care so much about this POS.

C-Mac · 04-21-2005, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

This is actually cool, Could I use it for my sig?

You'll have to get permission rights from "Girls gone Wild" inc.

C-Mac · 04-22-2005, 12:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vlad Logicslav

I don't recall you being such a jackass. WTF do you care so much about this POS.

I dont care about him, but I really dont see the huge difference in his opinion verses that of many other sports writers that are equally full of it. It also appeared as if DenverChief was almost calling me out.

go bo · 04-22-2005, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Yes but what's next....

The ban on people who use too many smilies in their posts, because it doesn't make a thread look pretty.

They're gonna sneak this one by you sooner or later.

but, but, but...

i didn't use a single smilie in the post you quoted, not one...

i understand what you're saying about bans in general, and i pretty much agree with what you're saying...

but it is true that some people think i use too many smilies, but heck, somebody's got to give the little critters some love...

DenverChief · 04-22-2005, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C-Mac

I dont care about him, but I really dont see the huge difference in his opinion verses that of many other sports writers that are equally full of it. It also appeared as if DenverChief was almost calling me out.

NOT ONE IOTA of information he writes has any truth to it....I prefer real news articles, Rand, Teicher, Pastabelly, Clayton, Kiper over Athan anyday at least they are credible ...Athan is like the Onion but no where near as funny

**ShortRoundChief** · 04-22-2005, 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bo

but, but, but...

i didn't use a single smilie in the post you quoted, not one...

i understand what you're saying about bans in general, and i pretty much agree with what you're saying...

but it is true that some people think i use too many smilies, but heck, somebody's got to give the little critters some love...

Ohhhhhhhhhh
that's what you're doing to the bananas

Logical · 04-22-2005, 12:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C-Mac

I dont care about him, but I really dont see the huge difference in his opinion verses that of many other sports writers that are equally full of it. It also appeared as if DenverChief was almost calling me out.

I really have no idea if DC was calling you out, I can understand your frustration if that is true.

However, clearly you have not been reading the constant bullshit that Athan constantly spews and people feel obligated to post for some strange reason. What he say will happen has never come true to my recollection, so how you compare him to real writers I am not sure.

Taco John · 04-22-2005, 12:12 AM

If you're going to ban people for getting Chiefs fans' hopes up for no good reason, there's going to be a lot of people who qualify.

04-22-2005, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

If you're going to ban people for getting Chiefs fans' hopes up for no good reason, there's going to be a lot of people who qualify.

I'm glad you posted on this thread, TJ. I'd like to recognize you for being accurate more often than Nick Athan. Congratulations - that's quite an honor.

Logical · 04-22-2005, 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taco John

If you're going to ban people for getting Chiefs fans' hopes up for no good reason, there's going to be a lot of people who qualify.

burn them, burn the witches

keg in kc · 04-22-2005, 12:14 AM

Please don't start banning people for idiocy and poor grammar. I'd be awfully lonely here, you know, since you'd all be gone.

Taco John · 04-22-2005, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I'm glad you posted on this thread, TJ. I'd like to recognize you for being accurate more often than Nick Athan. Congratulations - that's quite an honor.

Reconize, bitches...

C-Mac · 04-22-2005, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief

NOT ONE IOTA of information he writes has any truth to it....

...and what Jason Whitlocks writes does?

I hear what you are saying, but again I just dont see the need for a "ban" unless its used equally and fairly across the board.
I chose to think that most of us here can discern whats truth and whats BS.

**ShortRoundChief** · 04-22-2005, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc

Please don't start banning people for idiocy and poor grammar. I'd be awfully lonely here, you know, since you'd all be gone.

You'll never be alone. The voices will keep you company.

C-Mac · 04-22-2005, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phobia

I'm glad you posted on this thread, TJ. I'd like to recognize you for being accurate more often than Nick Athan. Congratulations - that's quite an honor.

View Poll Results: To ban or not to ban is the question
Yes	19	50.00%
No	13	34.21%
Gaz	6	15.79%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

04-21-2005, 11:16 PM
DenverChief Pedantic Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Rocky Ford Casino cash: $3072617	Motion to temporarily BAN... Anyone who starts another thread with an article written by Nick Athan...seriously this guy spews crap and I could care less to read it, we have already established his takes are complete and I think it clutters the front page with crap ...poll forthcoming....or start a Athan forum where those that on his articles can go
Posts: 17,051

04-22-2005, 12:12 AM	#38
Taco John Sapere Aude Join Date: Jun 2001 Casino cash: $427937	If you're going to ban people for getting Chiefs fans' hopes up for no good reason, there's going to be a lot of people who qualify. __________________ Ehyeh asher ehyeh. Donger's Razor: "The most establishment-friendly explanation that gives leftist and neocon politicians the most amount of cover is the only possible explanation, even when gaping holes and leaps of logic are required to get there."
Posts: 79,765

04-22-2005, 12:14 AM	#41
keg in kc oxymoron Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: OP/KC/Whatever Casino cash: $9556299	Please don't start banning people for idiocy and poor grammar. I'd be awfully lonely here, you know, since you'd all be gone.
Posts: 58,682