Chiefs Why should Tony Gonzalez be allowed to bail? - Page 3

memyselfI · 10-14-2008, 06:11 AM

He signed a contract in 2007 knowing full well how much the Chiefs have sucked and will suck. He CHOSE to stay here vs. going elsewhere were winning is a priority. Why should he be allowed bailout now that he realizes he made a mistake and the team is going nowhere fast?

He has been the one constant beacon of light for the team for many years now but does that give him the right to change his mind two years into his contract?

I like Tony and have always admired him but this just seems like a he's being a poor sport to me.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 10-14-2008, 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GonzoRox88

Eminem said it best:

"Shut up c*nt".

memyselfI · 10-14-2008, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by luv

What good is a stinking contract then?

Exactly. It's not like Tony didn't have a clue as to Carl's losing ways two years ago. It's a rather slippery slope precedent to set, IMO.

10-14-2008, 06:11 AM
memyselfI CHANGEd your mind yet???? Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Lunatics Anonymous Casino cash: $10005234	Why should Tony Gonzalez be allowed to bail? He signed a contract in 2007 knowing full well how much the Chiefs have sucked and will suck. He CHOSE to stay here vs. going elsewhere were winning is a priority. Why should he be allowed bailout now that he realizes he made a mistake and the team is going nowhere fast? He has been the one constant beacon of light for the team for many years now but does that give him the right to change his mind two years into his contract? I like Tony and have always admired him but this just seems like a he's being a poor sport to me.
Posts: 32,000