Chiefs that bullshit call just cost us this game - Page 3

reiko57 · 10-04-2009, 11:50 AM

i'm not even gonna bother to watch the rest of the game, i already turned it off

no ****ing way the giants score on the next play if that personal foul call is correct, what a bullshit call, someone check these refs' bank accounts.. its not even ****in football anymore, **** this shit, ill just get the NHL season pass, at least its still played by men

**RNR** · 10-04-2009, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BuckinKaeding

So what happened?

A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

**Buck** · 10-04-2009, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

Yeah, shit happens. That happens to every team at least 4-5 times each season.

reiko57 · 10-04-2009, 11:26 PM

i disagree, you never know how the ebb and flow of a game is going to pan out, i know i would much rather have watched a game where they didn't blow that call than the game we got...

DRU · 10-05-2009, 12:34 AM

What I'm still confused about is whether or not they actually did blow the call or if this new "defenseless receiver" rule is actually going to be called that way..??

I always just assumed it meant only on plays where the ball was un-catch-able or out-of-play. But when you really think about it he was indeed defenseless whether it's catch-able or not.

So if they really did call it "correctly" because of the new rule then that's really going to suck because an entire aspect of the game will be taken away. That hit was absolutely perfect. The ball hit the receiver's hands and he buried his shoulder directly into his chest separating the receiver from the ball. Absolutely perfect...but...he was defenseless.

So is that how they're calling it or did the ref's think he hit him in the head? If they consider that the new rule then they need to not let receivers run "defenseless" routes anymore.

Mecca · 10-05-2009, 12:36 AM

I think they thought he hit him in the head, the NFL is aware of all of the brain damage studies on former players, they are cracking down on that.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 10-05-2009, 12:39 AM

There's always an excuse with Chiefs fans, except for the only one that's actually true: the other team was better.

blazzin311 · 10-05-2009, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reiko57

i disagree, you never know how the ebb and flow of a game is going to pan out, i know i would much rather have watched a game where they didn't blow that call than the game we got...

Agreed.

philfree · 10-05-2009, 02:41 AM

Didn't cost the Chiefs the game but it did have effect on the game. Pus.s.ified version of the NFL....it's making it where it's not worth the money to watch.

PhilFree

**Bwana** · 10-05-2009, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider

A big hit on a reciever in the shoulderpads, ref called personal foul. It was a clean hit and a bullshit call that will have nothing to do with KC losing this game

Bingo

**Skip Towne** · 10-05-2009, 05:49 AM

Shut up, n00b

beach tribe · 10-05-2009, 06:07 AM

From what I have seen, and I know this is crazy, and i don't really believe it, just one of my conspiracy theories, is that the refs do NOT like Haley. He talks to them like dogs, and they hate him, and will never give him a call. I know these refs talk to each other. They hate him.

beach tribe · 10-05-2009, 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DRU

What I'm still confused about is whether or not they actually did blow the call or if this new "defenseless receiver" rule is actually going to be called that way..??

I always just assumed it meant only on plays where the ball was un-catch-able or out-of-play. But when you really think about it he was indeed defenseless whether it's catch-able or not.

So if they really did call it "correctly" because of the new rule then that's really going to suck because an entire aspect of the game will be taken away. That hit was absolutely perfect. The ball hit the receiver's hands and he buried his shoulder directly into his chest separating the receiver from the ball. Absolutely perfect...but...he was defenseless.

So is that how they're calling it or did the ref's think he hit him in the head? If they consider that the new rule then they need to not let receivers run "defenseless" routes anymore.

No way. That's just how you play safety, and if it would have been Bob Sanders, they would never have called that a penalty.

Mr. Arrowhead · 10-05-2009, 06:24 AM

it didnt cost us the game, but i will say, that was the worst call i have ever seen

Hydrae · 10-05-2009, 06:43 AM

My thought after that horrible call was that they should just change the league to the NHL - the No Hitting League.

**Easy 6** · 10-05-2009, 09:10 AM

IIRC, the guys on the halftime show were in unanimous agreement...terrible call.

Trent Dilfer especially, was very vocal & passionate about it, 'They're protecting players to the point that its hurting the game'.

10-04-2009, 11:50 AM
reiko57 Starter Join Date: Oct 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	that bullshit call just cost us this game i'm not even gonna bother to watch the rest of the game, i already turned it off no **ing way the giants score on the next play if that personal foul call is correct, what a bullshit call, someone check these refs' bank accounts.. its not even in football anymore, ** this shit, ill just get the NHL season pass, at least its still played by men
Posts: 181

10-04-2009, 11:26 PM	#33
reiko57 Starter Join Date: Oct 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	i disagree, you never know how the ebb and flow of a game is going to pan out, i know i would much rather have watched a game where they didn't blow that call than the game we got... __________________ myspace.com/felixvenom things exist at every level, you sit around paranoid about the consequences of small things, unpaid debt, insurance fraud, cocaine.. what do the men who own governments get paranoid about?
Posts: 181

10-05-2009, 12:34 AM	#34
DRU To the Game Join Date: Oct 2003 Casino cash: $6793516	What I'm still confused about is whether or not they actually did blow the call or if this new "defenseless receiver" rule is actually going to be called that way..?? I always just assumed it meant only on plays where the ball was un-catch-able or out-of-play. But when you really think about it he was indeed defenseless whether it's catch-able or not. So if they really did call it "correctly" because of the new rule then that's really going to suck because an entire aspect of the game will be taken away. That hit was absolutely perfect. The ball hit the receiver's hands and he buried his shoulder directly into his chest separating the receiver from the ball. Absolutely perfect...but...he was defenseless. So is that how they're calling it or did the ref's think he hit him in the head? If they consider that the new rule then they need to not let receivers run "defenseless" routes anymore.
Posts: 2,124

10-05-2009, 12:36 AM	#35
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-702950	I think they thought he hit him in the head, the NFL is aware of all of the brain damage studies on former players, they are cracking down on that.
Posts: 115,373

10-05-2009, 12:39 AM	#36
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7139572	There's always an excuse with Chiefs fans, except for the only one that's actually true: the other team was better. __________________ "When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 75,083

10-05-2009, 02:41 AM	#38
philfree Indian Twitter Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Free Agency Casino cash: $-2203802	Didn't cost the Chiefs the game but it did have effect on the game. Pus.s.ified version of the NFL....it's making it where it's not worth the money to watch. PhilFree __________________ [/SIGPIC]
Posts: 16,152

10-05-2009, 05:49 AM	#40
Skip Towne Supporter Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: T-Town Casino cash: $10004900	Shut up, n00b
Posts: 69,689

10-05-2009, 06:07 AM	#41
beach tribe Keep doubting J MFing Houston Join Date: May 2007 Location: ft.lauderdale Casino cash: $3898036	From what I have seen, and I know this is crazy, and i don't really believe it, just one of my conspiracy theories, is that the refs do NOT like Haley. He talks to them like dogs, and they hate him, and will never give him a call. I know these refs talk to each other. They hate him.
Posts: 21,429

10-05-2009, 06:24 AM	#43
Mr. Arrowhead MVP Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Wichita Casino cash: $10015708	it didnt cost us the game, but i will say, that was the worst call i have ever seen
Posts: 7,763

10-05-2009, 06:43 AM	#44
Hydrae MVP Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: Newport, Or Casino cash: $-1163000	My thought after that horrible call was that they should just change the league to the NHL - the No Hitting League. __________________ My 2024 Adopt-A-Chief: Rashee Rice
Posts: 14,858

10-05-2009, 09:10 AM	#45
Easy 6 pie is never free Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: the drivers seat Casino cash: $-172225	IIRC, the guys on the halftime show were in unanimous agreement...terrible call. Trent Dilfer especially, was very vocal & passionate about it, 'They're protecting players to the point that its hurting the game'.
Posts: 98,477