Chiefs If we get a replacement players and the Chiefs win the Superbowl - Page 3

Valiant · 02-12-2011, 01:15 PM

Does it count? and would you talk shit to rival fans about?

If it happens and we get replacement players, would you be proud that KC finally got a championship..

Pioli Zombie · 02-12-2011, 10:22 PM

The Chiefs wouldn't have a problem replacing Cassel. All they need to do is go to any outhouse, scoop out all the that blue and brown crap mixture, and pour it into a uniform.

SDChiefs · 02-12-2011, 10:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KnowMo2724

With the Chiefs luck the lockout would end after they went 16-0 and then they would lose at home in the playoffs to the Steelers.

Now this is funny. And sadly, probably true.

**kysirsoze** · 02-12-2011, 11:16 PM

Can anyone explain how on Earth it wouldn't count? When you think about it, it's already kind of absurd to get wrapped up in the accomplishments of other people (The Chiefs players). Does it make less sense to take pride and excitement from the accomplishments of a replacement batch?

If they're players hired by the Chiefs to play football then they would be every bit the Superbowl champions as any other year. What's the difference?

kcfanXIII · 02-12-2011, 11:46 PM

I don't think it would count, not professional players. We could say we won the replacement bowl. It wouldn't be a super bowl though.

milkman · 02-13-2011, 07:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcfanXIII

I don't think it would count, not professional players. We could say we won the replacement bowl. It wouldn't be a super bowl though.

The moment they get paid to play, they become professional.

But most of them will be players that have already played professionally on some level elsewhere.

Pioli Zombie · 02-13-2011, 07:33 AM

I wonder how that would effect fantasy football? I can just see the addicts studying up on all the replacements. "Oh man, I only got 22 pts from McGillicutty!!!!!!!"

**Slainte** · 02-13-2011, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bugeater

2 of the Redskins' Super Bowl wins were in strike-shortened seasons, does anyone think any less of them?

No...but then again, it's ****ing impossible for me to think less of the Redskins than I already do.

vailpass · 02-13-2011, 09:01 AM

at some of you

**BigMeatballDave** · 02-13-2011, 11:52 AM

I couldnt really get into 'replacement football'.

The_Doctor10 · 02-13-2011, 01:05 PM

Well imagine if a team was so devastated by injuries that they had to sign a ton of FA's off the street; like, Rohan Davey was playing QB, throwing to Kevin Curtis and Freddie Mitchell, handing the ball off to a recently paroled Maurice Clarett. If THEY won the Super Bowl, it'd still count. In fact, it'd be more impressive.

View Poll Results: If the Chiefs Replacement Players win the Superbowl does it count to you?
Yes it counts	36	42.86%
No it does not count	24	28.57%
Yes it counts and I am talking shit	27	32.14%
No it does not count and I am still talking shit	15	17.86%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

02-12-2011, 01:15 PM
Valiant Valiant 'The Thread Killer' Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $4522380	If we get a replacement players and the Chiefs win the Superbowl Does it count? and would you talk shit to rival fans about? If it happens and we get replacement players, would you be proud that KC finally got a championship..
Posts: 18,558

02-12-2011, 10:22 PM	#31
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	The Chiefs wouldn't have a problem replacing Cassel. All they need to do is go to any outhouse, scoop out all the that blue and brown crap mixture, and pour it into a uniform.
Posts: 11,077

02-12-2011, 11:16 PM	#33
kysirsoze SNAP THE ****ING BALL!!! Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: KCMO Casino cash: $66946	Can anyone explain how on Earth it wouldn't count? When you think about it, it's already kind of absurd to get wrapped up in the accomplishments of other people (The Chiefs players). Does it make less sense to take pride and excitement from the accomplishments of a replacement batch? If they're players hired by the Chiefs to play football then they would be every bit the Superbowl champions as any other year. What's the difference?
Posts: 11,972

02-12-2011, 11:46 PM	#34
kcfanXIII Ride on! Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Galaxy far far away Casino cash: $10013172	I don't think it would count, not professional players. We could say we won the replacement bowl. It wouldn't be a super bowl though.
Posts: 5,470

02-13-2011, 07:33 AM	#36
Pioli Zombie Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: olathe,kansas Casino cash: $10004900	I wonder how that would effect fantasy football? I can just see the addicts studying up on all the replacements. "Oh man, I only got 22 pts from McGillicutty!!!!!!!"
Posts: 11,077

02-13-2011, 09:01 AM	#38
vailpass Psycho Bag Of Squanch Join Date: Sep 2001 Casino cash: $9594244	at some of you
Posts: 69,591

02-13-2011, 11:52 AM	#39
BigMeatballDave GBM 8-12-15 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dayton, Oh. Casino cash: $10052154	I couldnt really get into 'replacement football'.
Posts: 59,997

02-13-2011, 01:05 PM	#40
The_Doctor10 Everyone else is 'peasants' Join Date: Nov 2008 Casino cash: $9914900	Well imagine if a team was so devastated by injuries that they had to sign a ton of FA's off the street; like, Rohan Davey was playing QB, throwing to Kevin Curtis and Freddie Mitchell, handing the ball off to a recently paroled Maurice Clarett. If THEY won the Super Bowl, it'd still count. In fact, it'd be more impressive. __________________ Fly Eagles Fly Patrick Mahomes has a losing record in Super Bowls that Kyle Shanahan is not the opposing HC. Tom Brady still the GOAT.
Posts: 1,532