KU **** OFFICIAL 2015-2016 Kansas Basketball Repository Thread **** - Page 301

Reerun_KC · 03:42 PM

Regular Season

Spoiler!

Big 12 Tournament

Spoiler!

http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-brac...ketball-men/d1

Saccopoo · 02-24-2016, 11:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

He's not going to have to worry about that problem (and it's a pretty big problem) because he's not going to be a NBA player anyway, at least not for any prolonged period of time. The stuff he does on offense just won't work against bigs with that kind of size.

He'll be just fine in the Taiwanese league. Average player there. Should make you happy as shit when he busts in the NBA his first week and has to play in Manila for a paycheck.

You're the best KU fan ever.

I'm going to tell my grandkids about you.

Chiefs Pantalones · 02-24-2016, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

that lost to oklahoma state when they didn't even bother to show up is going to cost us the #1 seed.

Not at all. KU's resume is so good (and the field is so weak as well) that according to Lunardi we can afford to lose two more times (at Texas and the first conference tournament game) and still get a 1 seed. That's just how it is this year.

KC_Connection · 02-24-2016, 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saccopoo

He'll be just fine in the Taiwanese league. Average player there. Should make you happy as shit when he busts in the NBA his first week and has to play in Manila for a paycheck.

You're the best KU fan ever.

I'm going to tell my grandkids about you.

I'm sure he'll play in Europe somewhere. I wish him all the best once he goes. Of course, the best thing is that I'll never have to watch him play defense again.

KC_Connection · 02-24-2016, 11:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

From a committee perspective, and without looking at the 24 teams ahead of them in Bracketology, I don't see how they have much of a case for anything higher than ~6-7. "Committee perspective" meaning resume, of course, not necessarily how good they are..... 1 top 50 win based on Sagarin and easily the worst record against top 50 than any of the other top 20. At least they won 28 games last year.

Yes. They won't be seeded high at all, but they are a top 10ish team in the country quality-wise. Somebody is going to end up getting the short end of the stick there.

**BigRedChief** · 02-24-2016, 11:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

Not at all. KU's resume is so good (and the field is so weak as well) that according to Lunardi we can afford to lose two more times (at Texas and the first conference tournament game) and still get a 1 seed. That's just how it is this year.

i was talking about the overall #1 seed.

Chiefs Pantalones · 02-25-2016, 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

i was talking about the overall #1 seed.

Not known yet about that, but it's unlikely we drop off the 1 line anyway. And really that's what you want. Anything can happen in a single elimination tournament but you want the highest seed you can get. Get one of those 1 seeds or 2s and see what happens.

saphojunkie · 02-25-2016, 02:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

I'm sure he'll play in Europe somewhere. I wish him all the best once he goes. Of course, the best thing is that I'll never have to watch him play defense again.

You're a piece of shit fan.

KC_Connection · 02-25-2016, 03:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

You're a piece of shit fan.

Because I don't like watching one of the players on the team play defense? Give me a ****ing break.

You have no idea what being a fan is if you think it is blind praise and support for any and every aspect of a team and its players.

Mr. Plow · 02-25-2016, 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

that lost to oklahoma state when they didn't even bother to show up is going to cost us the #1 seed.

Without looking at resumes, I'd guess that almost every top 10 team has bad losses - but I would also guess that none of them have the resume that KU has. Not that I care too much about it, but KU has a great shot at the overall #1 barring some shit show the final 2 weeks of the season.

**Bearcat** · 02-25-2016, 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

i was talking about the overall #1 seed.

Who is your #1 overall?

KC_Connection · 02-25-2016, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

Who is your #1 overall?

It's almost certainly going to be one of Kansas, Villanova or Oklahoma.

**Buehler445** · 02-25-2016, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow

Without looking at resumes, I'd guess that almost every top 10 team has bad losses - but I would also guess that none of them have the resume that KU has. Not that I care too much about it, but KU has a great shot at the overall #1 barring some shit show the final 2 weeks of the season.

A shitshow is definitely possible with this team. They've done it before.

**Buehler445** · 02-25-2016, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

It's almost certainly going to be one of Kansas, Villanova or Oklahoma.

How can it be OU over KU, presuming KU loses one here? I guess if OU beats KU in the b12 tournament they could, but how could they justify puttin OU above KU if KU won 100% of the head to head matchups?

**Bearcat** · 02-25-2016, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

It's almost certainly going to be one of Kansas, Villanova or Oklahoma.

Yeah, glancing at schedules, I'd say it's pretty clear that it'll be Kansas or Villanova.... personally, I think quality wins say more than bad losses (to an extent, of course), so one bad loss shouldn't hurt KU when they have the better SoS by 20 spots, more wins against the top 50 and against the top 25, and Villanova being 1-3 against the top 25 in Sagarin. The same reasoning could put OU in, but of course they were swept by Kansas, so I'd think OU would have to win out and either beat them in the B12 tournament or go much further.

sedated · 02-25-2016, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigRedChief

i was talking about the overall #1 seed.

Doesn't matter. #1 overall seeds have gotten shlt draws before and just because you get the "weakest" 2 seed doesn't mean it isn't negated with a good 3 or 4.

Only thing that matters is not getting shipped out east or west, and its pretty much a lock that KU will end up in either Louisville and Chicago.

03-23-2015, 12:00 PM
Reerun_KC Banned Join Date: Aug 2005 Casino cash: $7231160	** OFFICIAL 2015-2016 Kansas Basketball Repository Thread Regular Season Spoiler! FRI, NOVEMBER 13 NORTHERN COLORADO, W 109-72 TUE, NOVEMBER 17 MICHIGAN STATE, L 73-79 MON, NOVEMBER 23 CHAMINADE, W 123-72 TUE, NOVEMBER 24 UCLA, W 92-73 WED, NOVEMBER 25 VANDERBILT, W 70-63 TUE, DECEMBER 1 LOYOLA (MD.), W 94-61 SAT, DECEMBER 5 HARVARD, W 75-69 WED, DECEMBER 9 HOLY CROSS, W 92-59 SAT, DECEMBER 12 OREGON STATE, W 82-67 SAT, DECEMBER 1 MONTANA, W 88-46 TUE, DECEMBER 22 SAN DIEGO STATE, W 70-57 TUE, DECEMBER 29 UC IRVINE, W 78-53 SAT, JANUARY 2 BAYLOR, W 102-74 MON, JANUARY 4 OKLAHOMA, W 109-106 (3 OT) SAT, JANUARY 9 TEXAS TECH, W 69-59 TUE, JANUARY 12 WEST VIRGINIA, L 63-74 SAT, JANUARY 16 TCU, W 70-63 TUE, JANUARY 19 6 P.M. OKLAHOMA STATE, L 67-86 SAT, JANUARY 23 1 P.M. TEXAS, W 76-67 MON, JANUARY 25 8 P.M. IOWA STATE, L 72-85 SAT, JANUARY 30 6 P.M. KENTUCKY, W 90-84 WED, FEBRUARY 3 8 P.M. KANSAS STATE, W 77-59 SAT, FEBRUARY 6 11 A.M., TCU, W 75-56 TUE, FEBRUARY 9 6 P.M. WEST VIRGINIA, W 75-65 SAT, FEBRUARY 13 1 P.M. OKLAHOMA, W 76-72 MON, FEBRUARY 15 8 P.M. OKLAHOMA STATE, W 94-67 SAT, FEBRUARY 20 5 P.M. KANSAS STATE, W 72-63 TUE, FEBRUARY 23 7 P.M. BAYLOR, W 66-60 SAT, FEBRUARY 27 11 AM,. TEXAS TECH, W 67-58 MON, FEBRUARY 29 8 P.M. TEXAS, W 86-56 SAT, MARCH 5 3 PM IOWA STATE, W 85-78 Big 12 Tournament Spoiler!** http://www.ncaa.com/interactive-brac...ketball-men/d1 Last edited by Bearcat; 03-25-2016 at 03:42 PM..
Posts: 1,529