***NON-POLITICAL COVID-19 Discussion Thread***

[JakeF]

A couple of reminders...

Originally Posted by Bwana

Once again, don't come in this thread with some kind of political agenda, or you will be shown the door. If you want to go that route, there is a thread about this in DC.

Originally Posted by Dartgod

People, there is a lot of good information in this thread, let's try to keep the petty bickering to a minimum.

We all have varying opinions about the impact of this, the numbers, etc. We will all never agree with each other. But we can all keep it civil.

Thanks!

Click here for the original OP:

Spoiler!

Apparently the CoronaVirus can survive on a inanimate objects, such as door knobs, for 9 days.

California coronavirus case could be first spread within U.S. community, CDC says
By SOUMYA KARLAMANGLA, JACLYN COSGROVE
FEB. 26, 2020 8:04 PM

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating what could be the first case of novel coronavirus in the United States involving a patient in California who neither recently traveled out of the country nor was in contact with someone who did.

“At this time, the patient’s exposure is unknown. It’s possible this could be an instance of community spread of COVID-19, which would be the first time this has happened in the United States,” the CDC said in a statement. “Community spread means spread of an illness for which the source of infection is unknown. It’s also possible, however, that the patient may have been exposed to a returned traveler who was infected.”

The individual is a resident of Solano County and is receiving medical care in Sacramento County, according to the state Department of Public Health.

The CDC said the “case was detected through the U.S. public health system — picked up by astute clinicians.”

Officials at UC Davis Medical Center expanded on what the federal agency might have meant by that in an email sent Wednesday, as reported by the Davis Enterprise newspaper.

The patient arrived at UC Davis Medical Center from another hospital Feb. 19 and “had already been intubated, was on a ventilator, and given droplet protection orders because of an undiagnosed and suspected viral condition,” according to an email sent by UC Davis officials that was obtained by the Davis Enterprise.

The staff at UC Davis requested COVID-19 testing by the CDC, but because the patient didn’t fit the CDC’s existing criteria for the virus, a test wasn’t immediately administered, according to the email. The CDC then ordered the test Sunday, and results were announced Wednesday. Hospital administrators reportedly said in the email that despite these issues, there has been minimal exposure at the hospital because of safety protocols they have in place.

A UC Davis Health spokesperson declined Wednesday evening to share the email with The Times.

Since Feb. 2, more than 8,400 returning travelers from China have entered California, according to the state health department. They have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days and limit interactions with others as much as possible, officials said.

“This is a new virus, and while we are still learning about it, there is a lot we already know,” Dr. Sonia Angell, director of the California Department of Public Health, said in a statement. “We have been anticipating the potential for such a case in the U.S., and given our close familial, social and business relationships with China, it is not unexpected that the first case in the U.S. would be in California.”

It is not clear how the person became infected, but public health workers could not identify any contacts with people who had traveled to China or other areas where the virus is widespread. That raises concern that the virus is spreading in the United States, creating a challenge for public health officials, experts say.

“It’s the first signal that we could be having silent transmission in the community,” said Lawrence Gostin, director of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center on National and Global Health Law. “It probably means there are many more cases out there, and it probably means this individual has infected others, and now it’s a race to try to find out who that person has infected.”

On Tuesday, the CDC offered its most serious warning to date that the United States should expect and prepare for the coronavirus to become a more widespread health issue.

“Ultimately, we expect we will see coronavirus spread in this country,” said Nancy Messonnier, director of the CDC’s National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. “It’s not so much a question of if, but a question of when.”

According to the CDC’s latest count Wednesday morning, 59 U.S. residents have tested positive for the new strain of coronavirus — 42 of whom are repatriated citizens from a Diamond Princess cruise. That number has grown by two since Messonnier’s last count Tuesday, although the CDC was not immediately available to offer details on the additional cases.

More than 82,000 cases of coronavirus have been reported globally, and more than 2,700 people have died, with the majority in mainland China, the epicenter of the outbreak.

But public health leaders have repeatedly reminded residents that the health risk from the novel coronavirus to the general public remains low.

“While COVID-19 has a high transmission rate, it has a low mortality rate,” the state Department of Public Health said in a statement Wednesday. “From the international data we have, of those who have tested positive for COVID-19, approximately 80% do not exhibit symptoms that would require hospitalization. There have been no confirmed deaths related to COVID-19 in the United States to date.”

CDC officials have also warned that although the virus is likely to spread in U.S. communities, the flu still poses a greater risk.

Gostin said the news of potential silent transmission does not eliminate the possibility of containing the virus in the U.S. and preventing an outbreak.

“There are few enough cases that we should at least try,” he said. “Most of us are not optimistic that that will be successful, but we’re still in the position to try.”

[NotDonger]

From the UK:

Out of the 92,029 total infections attributed to delta, almost 20,000 were recorded in people who had received one dose of a Covid vaccine (both before and following 21 days after a first dose) and 7,235 infections were confirmed in people who had received two doses.

Unless my math is wrong, that's 7.86% breakthrough of the fully vaccinated.

[NotDonger]

And:

Number crunching the latest data from England, 92,029 cases were analyzed between early February and mid-June and were attributed to the delta variant.

Almost 82,500 of these total cases were recorded in people under 50 years old and a majority (53,822 cases) were found in unvaccinated individuals.

Among those cases in the unvaccinated cohort, the vast majority were in the under-50 age group (52,846 cases) and only 976 cases were in the over-50s.

Nonetheless, the data showed that there have been 117 deaths among people in England who had the delta variant with the majority being in the over-50 age group.

[NotDonger]

New data on Delta percentages by state:

Missouri = 29.9%
Colorado = 12.2%
California = 8.5%
New Jersey = 10.2%

[Sure-Oz]

@budweiserusa: For the first time in 25 years, Bill Pullman is back with a new speech to celebrate Independence Day. Watch now and #GoFourthAmerica.

Join us in supporting vaccine access everywhere in partnership with @directrelief https://twitter.com/budweiserusa/sta...183619/video/1

[Sure-Oz]

Originally Posted by NotDonger

New data on Delta percentages by state:

Missouri = 29.9%
Colorado = 12.2%
California = 8.5%
New Jersey = 10.2%

Good job Missouri

[wazu]

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

Good job Missouri

Thank you. These numbers reflect what a great job we've done at mostly eradicating all other variants. Next up: Delta.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by NotDonger

From the UK:

Out of the 92,029 total infections attributed to delta, almost 20,000 were recorded in people who had received one dose of a Covid vaccine (both before and following 21 days after a first dose) and 7,235 infections were confirmed in people who had received two doses.

Unless my math is wrong, that's 7.86% breakthrough of the fully vaccinated.

I thought breakthrough was (infections of vaccinated)/vaccinated rather than (infections of vaccinated)/infections. No?

[DaFace]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I thought breakthrough was (infections of vaccinated)/vaccinated rather than (infections of vaccinated)/infections. No?

Correct.

[NotDonger]

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I thought breakthrough was (infections of vaccinated)/vaccinated rather than (infections of vaccinated)/infections. No?

Wow, sorry. Pre-coffee... Thought that sounded terribly high.

32 million fully vaccinated. .02%

[TLO]

Pfizer, Moderna COVID vaccines produce ‘long-lasting’ immune response — study
Research indicates booster shots may not be needed and that inoculation is able to provide defense against at least some of the coronavirus variants

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tim...nse-study/amp/

[TLO]

SCIENCE, BITCH!!

[DaFace]

I'm not sure I understand. Perhaps if you posted it in a larger font?

(Again, I wish they had some info about J&J in there. I wonder if I'll eventually want to do one of the others as a "booster.")

[wazu]

Originally Posted by DaFace

I'm not sure I understand. Perhaps if you posted it in a larger font? oke:

(Again, I wish they had some info about J&J in there. I wonder if I'll eventually want to do one of the others as a "booster.")

I did see a quote from somebody referring to all three vaccines and saying they weren't anticipating a need for boosters, but I'm sure it's all subject to change.

[Monticore]

Originally Posted by DaFace

I'm not sure I understand. Perhaps if you posted it in a larger font?

(Again, I wish they had some info about J&J in there. I wonder if I'll eventually want to do one of the others as a "booster.")

I am sure everyone holding out hope for Betamax eventually bought a VHS.

[loochy]

Originally Posted by TLO

Pfizer, Moderna COVID vaccines produce ‘long-lasting’ immune response — study
Research indicates booster shots may not be needed and that inoculation is able to provide defense against at least some of the coronavirus variants

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.tim...nse-study/amp/

This doesn't make sense. If they don't force us to get boosters, then how can they ensure that we are sterile, magnetic, and mind controlled?