Frank Clark ****ing sucks

[RealSNR]

Guy has done NOTHING in two games. Barely any pressures to speak of against trash OTs.

Yeah, I'm in bitchy gameday mode. Don't care. I'm tired of paying out the ass for defensive players who don't make plays.

At least Justin Houston could dominate against bad teams after we paid him.

[Yosef_Malkovitch]

Originally Posted by irafreak

Maybe he hasn't fully recovered from covid. He did not look good today.

He hasn't looked good for most of the time he's been here. This isn't anything new.

[Sorce]

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties

1 tackle

0 sacks

0 qb hits



eat shit

And 1 missed high five.

[Hammock Parties]

frank's best rush of the night was looping in on a stunt unblocked, falling down, and getting in sneed's way on what might have been a sack

cc: DJ's Left Nut



granted it DID stop a drive thanks to fenton being in the right place

[RealSNR]

Yeah he's still bad.

[BWillie]

I really dont think he can get six sacks

[JPH83]

He's awful, nothing has changed. He's been a consistent POS and criminally overpaid.

[dlphg9]

Originally Posted by BWillie

I really dont think he can get six sacks

It'll be a ****ing miracle if he gets to 4

[kjwood75nro]

Can someone remind me, exactly, what he did to insure our Super Bowl win. I remember him making a sack, I remember the whole Shark thing, and I remember the picture of his drooling visage, but I still can't exactly recall how his effort was THE pivotal moment that, without him, would've guaranteed we don't make/win the SB.

Keep in mind the context of his contract and its implications.

[JPH83]

Originally Posted by kjwood75nro

Can someone remind me, exactly, what he did to insure our Super Bowl win. I remember him making a sack, I remember the whole Shark thing, and I remember the picture of his drooling visage, but I still can't exactly recall how his effort was THE pivotal moment that, without him, would've guaranteed we don't make/win the SB.

Keep in mind the context of his contract and its implications.

Don't, I hate going over this argument again. He's been a terrible player for us and we will immediately improve when he f***s off.

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by kjwood75nro

Can someone remind me, exactly, what he did to insure our Super Bowl win. I remember him making a sack, I remember the whole Shark thing, and I remember the picture of his drooling visage, but I still can't exactly recall how his effort was THE pivotal moment that, without him, would've guaranteed we don't make/win the SB.

Keep in mind the context of his contract and its implications.

He was an absolute monster for that entire postseason. Seriously, go back and watch the Texans game and how important he was in helping us blast our way back into that game. 10 pressures, 3 sacks. Cumulatively the second best EDGE that postseason behind only Nick Bosa. You can acknowledge both the facts that he's been terrible these last couple seasons and that he was absolutely instrumental in our 2019-2020 Super Bowl run.

[In58men]

Kyler Murray is a difficult QB to tackle and some of you are crying about him not getting 6 sacks

[Chris Meck]

So-not arguing anything either way on Frank Clark, but the reality of a defensive gameplan against Kyler Murray is similar to Lamar. You're probably not going to get a lot of sacks from your edge rushers unless they're coverage sacks. You try to keep him contained and IN the pocket because you're probably more concerned with his ability to run than pass and you need to keep him corralled.

So, while I'm not bullish on some great Clark resurgence, this isn't really the game to point to as evidence of anything.

The pass rush as a whole looked pretty good; Murray was mostly made uncomfortable and did not have running lanes for the most part. That's what you do against that guy, just like Lamar. You're not going to get a ton of sacks.

[Dunerdr]

Originally Posted by In58men

Kyler Murray is a difficult QB to tackle and some of you are crying about him not getting 6 sacks

I'd like to see the whole lines stats. The game plan for running qb's doesnt lend itself to sacks.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

So-not arguing anything either way on Frank Clark, but the reality of a defensive gameplan against Kyler Murray is similar to Lamar. You're probably not going to get a lot of sacks from your edge rushers unless they're coverage sacks. You try to keep him contained and IN the pocket because you're probably more concerned with his ability to run than pass and you need to keep him corralled.

So, while I'm not bullish on some great Clark resurgence, this isn't really the game to point to as evidence of anything.

The pass rush as a whole looked pretty good; Murray was mostly made uncomfortable and did not have running lanes for the most part. That's what you do against that guy, just like Lamar. You're not going to get a ton of sacks.

They got a lot of pressure yesterday. A LOT.

Now they just need to close. They're not going to be facing guys like Murray every week. They're going to get better.

[JPH83]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

They got a lot of pressure yesterday. A LOT.

Now they just need to close. They're not going to be facing guys like Murray every week. They're going to get better.

The Cards OL is pish, Chargers will be tougher, but I think Chris is right, probably trying to play contain a lot against Murray so we'll see.