Just in case you've ever wondered why Saulbadguy has had a neg rep campaign going .. - Page 4

greg63 · 11-04-2005, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biohazard

The only rep that comes from a rep thread is neg rep!

Beat me to it!

Biohazard · 11-04-2005, 04:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by greg63

Beat me to it!

Hey what can I say, but for what it is worth you have been rewarded with 2nd place.

11-04-2005, 04:33 PM

I'm terribly dissapointed. I was getting ready to log out and saw that out of all of the people here that said they were going to neg rep me, only two have and one of them forgot to push the disapprove button in the box.

If you say you are going to do something, let's do it!! I'm not vindictive, besides my reps or neg reps don't count!!

Have a good evening one and all.

greg63 · 11-04-2005, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Biohazard

Hey what can I say, but for what it is worth you have been rewarded with 2nd place.

greg63 · 11-04-2005, 04:24 PM

Well, I would hope that you've figured this out by now, but what the heck - I'm noted for stating the obvious. It is NEVER a good idea to start a thread about getting negative rep; it usually leads to more negative rep.

Eleazar · 11-04-2005, 04:34 PM

So, as long as we're having a tomcash thread, why does everyone call him a coward? Is it something other than the usernames? And why does phobia hate him so much?

I don't know the backstory.

**Saulbadguy** · 11-04-2005, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise

So, as long as we're having a tomcash thread, why does everyone call him a coward? Is it something other than the usernames? And why does phobia hate him so much?

I don't know the backstory.

Not entirely sure. I guess there was something that went on with 37 forever, that Tom went apeshit about. Then there was the falling out. Then Phil calls him on it, and Tom chickens out. Something to the sort.

**Skip Towne** · 11-04-2005, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Not entirely sure. I guess there was something that went on with 37 forever, that Tom went apeshit about. Then there was the falling out. Then Phil calls him on it, and Tom chickens out. Something to the sort.

Tom kept insisting he wasn't creating multiple identities but Phobia had him dead to rights through the IP. Tom said it was another Navy guy using the same computer and other transparent BS like that. Phobia banned him over and over. And he bitched and bitched. What a pussy.

11-04-2005, 06:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

Tom kept insisting he wasn't creating multiple identities but Phobia had him dead to rights through the IP. Tom said it was another Navy guy using the same computer and other transparent BS like that. Phobia banned him over and over. And he bitched and bitched. What a pussy.

Considering that the real story has been adjusted by Phobia and everybody knows that he is never wrong.

What was done with the foundation was done, it is over. You should all forget it, I have.

Skip hasn't a clue as to what went on, all he has is hearsay and as stated before, everyone knows that Phil would never exagerate anything.

**Skip Towne** · 11-04-2005, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lipschitz

Considering that the real story has been adjusted by Phobia and everybody knows that he is never wrong.

What was done with the foundation was done, it is over. You should all forget it, I have.

Skip hasn't a clue as to what went on, all he has is hearsay and as stated before, everyone knows that Phil would never exagerate anything.

Wrong again, dipshit. I was posting on the same thread where you were accusing Phobia of having only circumstantial evidence against you.

Eleazar · 11-04-2005, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

Not entirely sure. I guess there was something that went on with 37 forever, that Tom went apeshit about. Then there was the falling out. Then Phil calls him on it, and Tom chickens out. Something to the sort.

Wasn't there some deal where he had accused phobia of doing something unethical with the charity or somesuch? I've never heard the whole story here.

**Saulbadguy** · 11-04-2005, 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cochise

Wasn't there some deal where he had accused phobia of doing something unethical with the charity or somesuch? I've never heard the whole story here.

I don't think it was "unethical" as it was a difference of vision(s). I really don't know much about it other than what has been repeated to me. Tom went on some tour of duty as a comfort soldier (deck ape), and apparently he was upset that 37 Forever did things while he was gone.

Eleazar · 11-04-2005, 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

I don't think it was "unethical" as it was a difference of vision(s). I really don't know much about it other than what has been repeated to me. Tom went on some tour of duty as a comfort soldier (deck ape), and apparently he was upset that 37 Forever did things while he was gone.

Sounds fascinating.

Are you cheating on your post count? I was a few posts ahead of you not long ago and now I'm 3,000 behind. Something is fishy. Course I did take that vacation

11-04-2005, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saulbadguy

I don't think it was "unethical" as it was a difference of vision(s). I really don't know much about it other than what has been repeated to me. Tom went on some tour of duty as a comfort soldier (deck ape), and apparently he was upset that 37 Forever did things while he was gone.

I don't like to air charity dirty laundry in public. 100% of my dislike of Tom is related to what he's done in this forum and behind the scenes to me personally.

The only reason 37 Forever is ever mentioned is because we were both on the 37 Forever executive board at one time together. He resigned to go on active duty in the Navy. When he returned he mistakenly assumed he'd be given his old position. We add board members through a nomination and voting process that is in our by-laws. Tom was never nominated but I had a vote anyway. Nobody wanted him involved in 37 Forever, not after his chickenshit behavior on ChiefsPlanet. So he's held that against me ever since. That's it in a nutshell.

11-04-2005, 04:33 PM	#3
Lipschitz Guest Casino cash: $	I'm terribly dissapointed. I was getting ready to log out and saw that out of all of the people here that said they were going to neg rep me, only two have and one of them forgot to push the disapprove button in the box. If you say you are going to do something, let's do it!! I'm not vindictive, besides my reps or neg reps don't count!! Have a good evening one and all.
Posts: n/a

11-04-2005, 04:24 PM	#5
greg63 Homer go crazy!!! Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: SE Kansas Casino cash: $8534990	Well, I would hope that you've figured this out by now, but what the heck - I'm noted for stating the obvious. It is NEVER a good idea to start a thread about getting negative rep; it usually leads to more negative rep. __________________
Posts: 17,870

11-04-2005, 04:34 PM	#6
Eleazar Beyond the Rapids Join Date: May 2003 Location: Langley, VA Casino cash: $-370000	So, as long as we're having a tomcash thread, why does everyone call him a coward? Is it something other than the usernames? And why does phobia hate him so much? I don't know the backstory.
Posts: 80,659