Herms response to LJ reported by 101 The Fox - Page 4

**Smed1065** · 09-27-2007, 06:53 AM

101 The Fox is reporting that Herms response to LJs (checker-chess) comment was that LJ was the problem due to his holdout and getting a late start.

They stated that Brian W agrees with Herm on this as well?

No link due to hearing it reported twice on 101.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Is this the beginning of the end?

Or is it a ploy to get LJ pissed off and running?

Reerun_KC · 09-27-2007, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

He hit him in the hands. Good enough for me. Tony caught that pass from Trent dozens of times.

I'm realistic. The ball isn't going to be perfect every time. Tony makes a lot more money than Huard. The onus is on him.

True and considering how bad Huard acutally is and he should never ever be on the field for any team.... I guess we should be just excited that he even got the ball that close to TG...

Your right, it is all Tony's fault.. He is the pro bowler, not Huard.. He is heading for the Hall of Fame, Not Huard...

Tony should of stepped up and bailed his pathetice career backup out..

bobbything · 09-27-2007, 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Watch it again.

Meh, it's on both of them. It probably should have been caught; but Huard threw an incredibly shitty pass.

I have more of a problem with Huard playing scared after that play (until the 2nd quarter that is).

**HemiEd** · 09-27-2007, 08:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Watch it again.

I stand corrected. That is the first play? The angle I have at home is more of a straight on sideline shot.

**Tribal Warfare** · 09-27-2007, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Watch it again.

notice the safeties readying themselves for a killshot on an exposed Gonzalez

InChiefsHeaven · 09-27-2007, 09:06 AM

I was at the game, and I remember thinking he tipped it, this vid confirms that. But I also remember thinking "Jeez, Damon, you had tons of time and you can't hit the big 88 in the numbers?

It looked like Tony could have caught that pass, but I give Tony a little more benefit of the doubt. There was no need for the pass to be that high.

20% bad on Tony, 80% bad on Huard.

Radar Chief · 09-27-2007, 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GOATSE

Seriously, did you guys see LJ's long run? The O-line blocked beautifully on that play, even Wiegmann. LJ made two guys miss and took it down to the 5. Too bad Jeff Webb ****ed it up.

That run came out of the single back, three WR formation. Bennet had a nice 9 yard gain from the same formation.
This should be a hint to the coaches.

**DaKCMan AP** · 09-27-2007, 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

That run came out of the single back, three WR formation. Bennet had a nice 9 yard gain from the same formation.
This should be a hint to the coaches.

Are you trying to say that some running lanes will open if we spread out the defense?

BLASPHEMY!!

Sure-Oz · 09-27-2007, 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

You're insane. He was extremely anxious to get back to the team in TC and run out and practice. If he wasn't hungry, he wouldn't be so frustrated with the lack of success. His delay of game penalty spells hunger and frustration.

To say LJ is a happy fat cat is ridiculous.

I agree as well, he just isn't getting any balance to help him run and the Oline is going against a defense that can predict the O.

trndobrd · 09-27-2007, 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Are you trying to say that some running lanes will open if we spread out the defense?

BLASPHEMY!!

Not if the QB always throws the checkdown instead of a forward pass.

Radar Chief · 09-27-2007, 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

You're insane. He was extremely anxious to get back to the team in TC and run out and practice. If he wasn't hungry, he wouldn't be so frustrated with the lack of success. His delay of game penalty spells hunger and frustration.

To say LJ is a happy fat cat is ridiculous.

Late in the 4th quarter the Chiefs needed a first down to seal the game. Solari calls a power running play, I formation with 2 TE and 1 WR, straight up the middle. Larry head buts the tangle of bodies in the middle of the field and goes down. He very well could’ve bounced it outside for a big gain and at least a 1st down. We’ve seen him do this, we know he can.
I think it’s a case that he decided the play wasn’t going to work and just stepped through the motions rather than attacking. But that’s just my opinion from what I’m seeing.

RINGLEADER · 09-27-2007, 09:21 AM

Throw the ball more and lanes will open. Herm/Solari don't seem to understand this until the 4th quarter.

**HemiEd** · 09-27-2007, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

Late in the 4th quarter the Chiefs needed a first down to seal the game. Solari calls a power running play, I formation with 2 TE and 1 WR, straight up the middle. Larry head buts the tangle of bodies in the middle of the field and goes down. He very well could’ve bounced it outside for a big gain and at least a 1st down. We’ve seen him do this, we know he can.
I think it’s a case that he decided the play wasn’t going to work and just stepped through the motions rather than attacking. But that’s just my opinion from what I’m seeing.

Yep, I agree.

FAX · 09-27-2007, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

Late in the 4th quarter the Chiefs needed a first down to seal the game. Solari calls a power running play, I formation with 2 TE and 1 WR, straight up the middle. Larry head buts the tangle of bodies in the middle of the field and goes down. He very well could’ve bounced it outside for a big gain and at least a 1st down. We’ve seen him do this, we know he can.
I think it’s a case that he decided the play wasn’t going to work and just stepped through the motions rather than attacking. But that’s just my opinion from what I’m seeing.

Hmmm. I wonder if LJ is thinking he'll just run 'em as they call 'em to make a point.

FAX

Radar Chief · 09-27-2007, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

Are you trying to say that some running lanes will open if we spread out the defense?

BLASPHEMY!!

Running from a passing formation? Passing from a running formation?
Yea, who’d ever want to do that.

**DaKCMan AP** · 09-27-2007, 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief

Running from a passing formation? Passing from a running formation?
Yea, who’d ever want to do that.

That's not even arena league ball. That's outer-space, universe crazy football.

09-27-2007, 06:53 AM
Smed1065 Supporter Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Returning From Hell Casino cash: $4733673	Herms response to LJ reported by 101 The Fox 101 The Fox is reporting that Herms response to LJs (checker-chess) comment was that LJ was the problem due to his holdout and getting a late start. They stated that Brian W agrees with Herm on this as well? No link due to hearing it reported twice on 101. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Is this the beginning of the end? Or is it a ploy to get LJ pissed off and running?
Posts: 10,212

09-27-2007, 09:06 AM	#50
InChiefsHeaven Rockin' yer FACE OFF! Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Omaha, Nebraska Casino cash: $545437	I was at the game, and I remember thinking he tipped it, this vid confirms that. But I also remember thinking "Jeez, Damon, you had tons of time and you can't hit the big 88 in the numbers? It looked like Tony could have caught that pass, but I give Tony a little more benefit of the doubt. There was no need for the pass to be that high. 20% bad on Tony, 80% bad on Huard. __________________ We have a million reasons for failure, but not one excuse... Die Donks, DIE!! Holy Crap fellas!!! We did it!!! THREE TIMES!!!
Posts: 27,274

09-27-2007, 09:21 AM	#56
RINGLEADER In Search of a Life Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Confusion, USA Casino cash: $8070503	Throw the ball more and lanes will open. Herm/Solari don't seem to understand this until the 4th quarter.
Posts: 48,491