Mizzou Ranked #24 in the AP!

[ChiefsRoyalsMizzou]

AP Top 25
RK TEAM RECORD PTS
1 Florida (54) 4-0 1486
2 Texas (1) 4-0 1416
3 Alabama (5) 5-0 1404
4 LSU 5-0 1290
5 Virginia Tech 4-1 1200
6 Boise State 5-0 1185
7 USC 4-1 1108
8 Cincinnati 5-0 1004
9 Ohio State 4-1 994
10 TCU 4-0 940
11 Miami (FL) 3-1 931
12 Iowa 5-0 823
13 Oregon 4-1 676
14 Penn State 4-1 564
15 Oklahoma State 3-1 563
16 Kansas 4-0 513
17 Auburn 5-0 428
18 Brigham Young 4-1 403
19 Oklahoma 2-2 370
20 Mississippi 3-1 357
21 Nebraska 3-1 333
22 Georgia Tech 4-1 311
23 South Florida 5-0 238
24 Missouri 4-0 215
25 South Carolina 4-1 200
Dropped from rankings: Houston 12, Georgia 18, Michigan 22, California 24
Others receiving votes: Wisconsin 157, Houston 142, Georgia 115, Stanford 50, Utah 31, Michigan 25, Boston College 12, Notre Dame 9, Pittsburgh 3, Arizona 2, West Virginia 2

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Just sayin, 1 loss SC would finish higher than Boise.

Then there'll be alot of big controversy on the BCS if a one loss team finish higher than a 0 loss team, considering that 0 loss team is currently ranked above the 1 loss team.

Sorry, no dice.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

No other team can have a turf color other than green, after Boise did that they put in a rule about it.

Wrong.

The NCAA has no such rule; any school may paint its field any color other than green if it wishes. Though painting the end zones is common, and schools have wide latitude in how to do so.

[BWillie]

If Iowa or South Florida run the table do they fall short behind a 1 loss SEC or BIG 12 team?

That is what I want to see happen. I don't think there will be a huge uproar if Boise doesn't get in undefeated, but there would be for these guys.

[Coach]

Also Division II University of New Haven became the second NCAA institution to install and compete on blue turf for the 2009 season.

ALSO a NCAA member.

[Mecca]

Yea if USC goes into Oregon and beats the team that is Boise's 1 quality win they are going to jump them...

Ohio State played for the title a couple years ago with 2 losses when teams like Boise had 1 or none I don't recall but it was less.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Coach

Also Division II University of New Haven became the second NCAA institution to install and compete on blue turf for the 2009 season.

ALSO a NCAA member.

You better call someone then because they talk about that everytime Boise is on TV that no other team can have it.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Yea if USC goes into Oregon and beats the team that is Boise's 1 quality win they are going to jump them...

Ohio State played for the title a couple years ago with 2 losses when teams like Boise had 1 or none I don't recall but it was less.

That's because as I mentioned, OSU was ranked high enough to take on 2 losses, considering Boise was either not ranked or was ranked too low to be taken seriously.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Mecca

You better call someone then because they talk about that everytime Boise is on TV that no other team can have it.

I have. There is no rule for it.

[Mecca]

You know if given the choice they are not going to vote for a Florida/Boise title game.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by Coach

Then there'll be alot of big controversy on the BCS if a one loss team finish higher than a 0 loss team, considering that 0 loss team is currently ranked above the 1 loss team.

Sorry, no dice.

If it's a case of 3 or 4 or whatever, that's one thing... but I don't think they'll let BSU into the NC game. That goes against the whole reason for the BCS.

Originally Posted by Mecca

No other team can have a turf color other than green, after Boise did that they put in a rule about it.

It's posts like this that make the ignore feature confusing sometimes.

[Coach]

Originally Posted by Bearcat

If it's a case of 3 or 4 or whatever, that's one thing... but I don't think they'll let BSU into the NC game. That goes against the whole reason for the BCS.

It's situations like this really makes me want to have a playoff system. I mean, it's doing wonderfully well in NCAA I-AA and lower levels. Why would it be any different here?

And if they're concerned about the $ issue, in fact, I would tend to believe that the NCAA or the teams/TV contracts would make MORE money this way.

[Bearcat]

Originally Posted by Coach

It's situations like this really makes me want to have a playoff system. I mean, it's doing wonderfully well in NCAA I-AA and lower levels. Why would it be any different here?

And if they're concerned about the $ issue, in fact, I would tend to believe that the NCAA or the teams/TV contracts would make MORE money this way.

I've never seen a good reason against it. Keep the bowls, keep the BCS sites, whatever.... add a couple of games to the season and make that much more money. The terribly overrated yet somehow entitled conferences like the Big 10 could still get their one team in if they wanted to keep those requirements (not that I think they should, but it's the only way a playoff would ever happen, so fine), and arguing over #8 or 9 is far less dramatic since you'll always be talking about 1 or 2 loss teams by that point.

It makes far too much sense.

[Skip Towne]

Originally Posted by Raised On Riots

What's up with that toxic blue field of theirs?

The story I heard was that ducks thought it was a lake when it was green and would land on it and shit all over it. So they made it blue to solve that problem. Don't know if it's true.

[Mecca]

Didn't the Big 10 and the Rose Bowl say if there was a playoff they'd basically not participate or something reeruned like that?

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by Skip Towne

The story I heard was that ducks thought it was a lake when it was green and would land on it and shit all over it. So they made it blue to solve that problem. Don't know if it's true.