Dallas Cowboys scouting report: Kansas City Chiefs

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by carlos3652

Wait, isnt GB the team that had the OT on their PS that everyone went crazy for when we (and 32 other teams) didnt claim him... yet theur OT suck ass and gave up 20 sacks already? What am i missing...

Buffalo signed him like 2 weeks ago making GB probably pretty upset he's gone.

[carlos3652]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Buffalo signed him like 2 weeks ago making GB probably pretty upset he's gone.

I just dont understand why they would even risk it considering they blow... GB that is, why try to leave that guy on the PS...he wasnt good enough to be one of their best 4 OT?

[Mile High Mania]

It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

[notorious]

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

It's more than just the QBs... I think the Packers have a better defense than KC. I also think the Packers have a better set of WRs.

You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

[JD10367]

Originally Posted by notorious

You can say that for every position and every player from any team when comparing anything to the Chiefs.

No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB.

[notorious]

Originally Posted by JD10367

No matter if Cassel or Croyle is starting... You have a good backup QB.

Damnit, I forgot Colquitt, too!

[InChiefsHeaven]

I guess the question is this...would Aaron Rodgers make those plays here in KC? Would Matt Cassel look as bad in Green Bay? He looked pretty damn good last year in New England...

[JD10367]

On ESPN, Schlereth just talked about the "Upset Alert" for this week, and he nominated the Titans against the Colts, and the Chiefs against the Cowboys.

[Chief Faithful]

So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

[Saccopoo]

Originally Posted by Chief Faithful

So has WR become the #1 need in the 2010 draft?

Based on the first quarter performances, I think that team need is something like this:

1. Center
2. Guard
3. Inside "Will" linebacker
4. Tight end
5. Safety
6. Left offensive tackle
7. Punt/Kick returner
8. Right offensive tackle
9. Inside "Mike" linebacker
10. Wide receiver
11. Outside "Jack" linebacker
12. Fullback
13. Outside "Sam" linebacker
14. Cornerback
15. Kicker
16. Punter
17. Quarterback

[Pioli Zombie]

Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

[milkman]

Originally Posted by Pioli Zombie

Ok so its been decided. Pioli should have gone back in time and drafted Aaron Rodgers. Ok. I agree with that.
Posted via Mobile Device

The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

[tonyetony]

Originally Posted by milkman

The comparison is being made, dumbass, because everyone defending Cassel is saying, well, he doesn't have any time, he can't make plays or do anything with no protection.

Well Aaron Rogers is making plays and putting up yards in spite of the fact that he isn't getting any more time than Cassel's sorry ass.

And I'm sorry your dumb ass is too ****ing stupid to understand that.

I've watched all the Packers games and to say Cassel is getting the same time in the pocket as Rodgers is complete and utter BS. I know that Rodgers is taking some sacks and that the Packers line sucks but our line sucks much much much worse than theirs. I would swap our line for theirs any day of the week.