Chiefs A guy on Sportsnation just said.... - Page 4

TheSourceX1 · 11-07-2011, 05:35 PM

Chiefs are the colts with a better secondary.
Brady would make the Chiefs a legit SuperBowl pick.

Okie_Apparition · 11-07-2011, 05:36 PM

The Chiefs are a better balanced team then I have ever witnessed. It's not lopsided on defense or offense talent. That mother****ing QB postion

Bump · 11-07-2011, 06:06 PM

it's amazing what an elite QB can do for a team. Without Brady they would be even worse, but even with him, their defense is so terrible this season they won't contend. You still need a good defense regardless of who your QB is.

stonedstooge · 11-07-2011, 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bump

it's amazing what an elite QB can do for a team. Without Brady they would be even worse, but even with him, their defense is so terrible this season they won't contend. You still need a good defense regardless of who your QB is.

Coach Vermeil says no and you don't even need an elite QB

Chiefs Pantalones · 11-07-2011, 06:11 PM

The Pats have no playmakers? Umm Hernandez, Welker, Gronkowski(sp). They have a fair share. Stupid comment.

**Dylan** · 11-07-2011, 07:39 PM

Let's go Da'Bears!

Will someone please start a MNF thread?

TIA & GB

KC Hawks · 11-07-2011, 07:22 PM

2011 Chiefs with Brady > 2011 Patriots with Brady

aturnis · 11-07-2011, 09:33 PM

It would be nice if any of you who call this a incredibly stupid comment would elaborate. IMO, if they don't have Brady, they are actually worse than the Chiefs, but really all he is saying is that without Brady, the Patriots are a 6-10 to 9-7 team. Which is being pretty generous.

Brock · 11-07-2011, 09:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

It would be nice if any of you who call this a incredibly stupid comment would elaborate. IMO, if they don't have Brady, they are actually worse than the Chiefs, but really all he is saying is that without Brady, the Patriots are a 6-10 to 9-7 team. Which is being pretty generous.

(no playmakers)

aturnis · 11-07-2011, 09:58 PM

I thought I heard this on ESPN this morning, and didn't hear the no playmakers part.

**chefsos** · 11-07-2011, 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis

I thought I heard this on ESPN this morning, and didn't hear the no playmakers part.

I think you're right. It was Cowherd who said it, twice, once on his morning show and again on SN. I didn't hear the "no playmakers" comment this morning either.

ChiefsrGood · 11-07-2011, 10:20 PM

It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though.

but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki
Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be
McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses
So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe

Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB.

Brock · 11-07-2011, 10:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsrGood

It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though.

but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki
Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be
McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses
So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe

Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB.

Shit, if you gave Brady Steve Breaston and Dwayne Bowe along with some of the guys we have on defense, that's a super bowl team for sure.

HoneyBadger · 11-08-2011, 02:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsrGood

It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though.

but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki
Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be
McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses
So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe

Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB.

What about Berry? He's not a playmaker?

Dex just is horrible. To call him a "playmaker" is ridiculous. If we only have 1 now and 2 injured, how will we "be loaded" next year?

**HemiEd** · 11-08-2011, 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsrGood

It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though.

but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki
Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be
McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses
So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe

Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB.

Playmakers can be on the Defensive side of the ball as well, just sayin.

11-07-2011, 05:35 PM	#1
TheSourceX1 Starter Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: SoCal Casino cash: $6175327	Chiefs are the colts with a better secondary. Brady would make the Chiefs a legit SuperBowl pick.
Posts: 140

11-07-2011, 05:36 PM	#2
Okie_Apparition Banned Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: floatin cobwebs n the sky Casino cash: $10004900	The Chiefs are a better balanced team then I have ever witnessed. It's not lopsided on defense or offense talent. That mother****ing QB postion
Posts: 7,012

11-07-2011, 06:06 PM	#3
Bump YOU take YOUR seat Join Date: Nov 2007 Casino cash: $-1664895	it's amazing what an elite QB can do for a team. Without Brady they would be even worse, but even with him, their defense is so terrible this season they won't contend. You still need a good defense regardless of who your QB is.
Posts: 38,257

11-07-2011, 06:11 PM	#5
Chiefs Pantalones GO CHIEFS!!!!!! Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Kansas City Casino cash: $6868717	The Pats have no playmakers? Umm Hernandez, Welker, Gronkowski(sp). They have a fair share. Stupid comment. __________________ Don't be fooled by my username, I'm white.
Posts: 26,653

11-07-2011, 07:39 PM	#6
Dylan The Lede Join Date: Aug 2007 Casino cash: $10016591	*Let's go Da'Bears!* Will someone please start a MNF thread? TIA & GB __________________
Posts: 33,643

11-07-2011, 07:22 PM	#7
KC Hawks Veteran Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: The West Side Casino cash: $-2405690	2011 Chiefs with Brady > 2011 Patriots with Brady
Posts: 3,300

11-07-2011, 09:33 PM	#8
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	It would be nice if any of you who call this a incredibly stupid comment would elaborate. IMO, if they don't have Brady, they are actually worse than the Chiefs, but really all he is saying is that without Brady, the Patriots are a 6-10 to 9-7 team. Which is being pretty generous.
Posts: 13,873

11-07-2011, 09:58 PM	#10
aturnis MVP Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: Iowa Casino cash: $9975811	I thought I heard this on ESPN this morning, and didn't hear the no playmakers part.
Posts: 13,873

11-07-2011, 10:20 PM	#12
ChiefsrGood Banned Join Date: Nov 2010 Casino cash: $10004900	It's kind of a stupid statement I heard it myself. Sort of true though. but two of our playmakers are on IR Charles, Moeaki Baldwin has played in 3 games you can't label him a playmaker although I think he will be McCluster is a playmaker in his own way. kickoffs, punts, reverses So really the only playmaker we have now is bowe Next year this team will be loaded with playmakers...especially with a new QB.
Posts: 614