Chiefs Hunt willing to trade pick per kffl - Page 4

**BigMeatballDave** · 01-15-2013, 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

A team traded up for Tannehill. Think about that.

Not to #1

crossbow · 01-15-2013, 09:22 AM

In the fine tradition of Kansas City Football we picked another lousy year to have a good draft position.

Fat Elvis · 01-15-2013, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DMAC

They are stuck at #1.

I think both Arizona and Buffalo might get in a bidding war for our #1 pick.

I also think that KC will ultimately wind up with EJ Manuel as the rookie QB.

Vick will be brought in this year--Reid has a big man crush on him--and next year Josh Freeman will be brought in as a potential QB.

Having Manuel, Vick, and Freeman competing for the starting QB position would not be that bad in my opinion.

We could do a lot worse. Like this past year.

Brock · 01-15-2013, 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

I think both Arizona and Buffalo might get in a bidding war for our #1 pick.

For who?

**RealSNR** · 01-15-2013, 09:26 AM

Turn your rep on

**BossChief** · 01-15-2013, 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts

If there was a QB worth that kind of haul ala RGKnee, don't you think we'd just snatch him up ourselves since we don't have a Sam Bradford?

I agree but it's possible Reid sees something in Geno he doesn't like and feels a guy like Barkley is a better fit. Like I said, I'd rather have the top pick spent on a qb and no messing around, but I'm ok as long as we get a qb.

**BossChief** · 01-15-2013, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

A team traded up for Tannehill. Think about that.

Huh?

Jayhawk Chief · 01-15-2013, 09:37 AM

Keep all options open. Good plan.

Fat Elvis · 01-15-2013, 09:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brock

For who?

Smith.

They are just as desperate for a QB as KC--arguably, AZ more so, that, and Buffalo has openly said they will be looking to draft their franchise QB this year.

Those two teams are pretty panicked about the QB situation. It seems like the new regime in KC isn't nearly as concerned. I mean they know the QB situation is bad, but they don't seem to think that any particular QB (read: Geno) is heads and shoulders above other QBs they can snag later on in the draft.

Personally, I think it sucks, but based on the recent pressers, I'm not getting my hopes up that we will actually use the #1 pick on Geno.

Brock · 01-15-2013, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Smith.

If Smith is worth getting into a bidding war for, we should just take him. JMO.

candyman · 01-15-2013, 09:51 AM

Im sure its already been said, but there's no way anyone would give up what they'd have to to move up to #1, there's no player in this draft that's worth it. That being said if someone offered and we could still pick in the top 5 I would be all over that.

kcchiefsus · 01-15-2013, 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J Diddy

Hunt makes all the calls. He's the owner. Dumb post.

On draft day? No, he's not going to make the call. He's not a football guy and he knows that, even with him getting more involved with the franchise he's not going to make a call like that. He isn't Jerry Jones.

kcchiefsus · 01-15-2013, 09:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

Smith.

They are just as desperate for a QB as KC--arguably, AZ more so, that, and Buffalo has openly said they will be looking to draft their franchise QB this year.

Those two teams are pretty panicked about the QB situation. It seems like the new regime in KC isn't nearly as concerned. I mean they know the QB situation is bad, but they don't seem to think that any particular QB (read: Geno) is heads and shoulders above other QBs they can snag later on in the draft.

Personally, I think it sucks, but based on the recent pressers, I'm not getting my hopes up that we will actually use the #1 pick on Geno.

And you know this how? Let me guess, from SPECULATION you read in the media. There is not a single team in the nfl that needs more help at quarterback than the chiefs.

royr17 · 01-15-2013, 09:59 AM

If they dont take Geno, I'd rather have Winson or E.J. Manuel in the 2nd round instead Barkley. Barkley would be the right fit for the west coast offense but i want more than just that.

Thig Lyfe · 01-15-2013, 10:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fat Elvis

I think both Arizona and Buffalo might get in a bidding war for our #1 pick.

I also think that KC will ultimately wind up with EJ Manuel as the rookie QB.

Vick will be brought in this year--Reid has a big man crush on him--and next year Josh Freeman will be brought in as a potential QB.

Having Manuel, Vick, and Freeman competing for the starting QB position would not be that bad in my opinion.

We could do a lot worse. Like this past year.

wat

01-15-2013, 07:08 AM
kczoo Donkey Trainer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Marshfield Casino cash: $9864900	Hunt willing to trade pick per kffl Damn
Posts: 588

01-15-2013, 09:22 AM	#47
crossbow King of Sarcasm Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: at home Casino cash: $10004900	In the fine tradition of Kansas City Football we picked another lousy year to have a good draft position. __________________ If the mind were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't.
Posts: 2,159

01-15-2013, 09:37 AM	#53
Jayhawk Chief Starter Join Date: Dec 2012 Casino cash: $10004900	Keep all options open. Good plan.
Posts: 36

01-15-2013, 09:51 AM	#56
candyman Banned Join Date: Dec 2012 Casino cash: $10004950	Im sure its already been said, but there's no way anyone would give up what they'd have to to move up to #1, there's no player in this draft that's worth it. That being said if someone offered and we could still pick in the top 5 I would be all over that.
Posts: 729

01-15-2013, 09:59 AM	#59
royr17 MVP Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Lovin my kids Casino cash: $1748676	If they dont take Geno, I'd rather have Winson or E.J. Manuel in the 2nd round instead Barkley. Barkley would be the right fit for the west coast offense but i want more than just that.
Posts: 6,194