Chiefs Marcus Peters also had verbal altercation with assistant coach Sunday - Page 41

**Tribal Warfare** · 12-09-2017, 12:59 PM

http://amp.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...mpression=true

Chiefs cornerback Marcus Peters’ frustration following the Chiefs’ 38-31 loss to the New York Jets didn’t end immediately after the game, it appears.

According to a report by NFL Network’s Mike Garafalo, Peters also had a verbal altercation with an assistant coach on the bus during the team’s ride to airport following the game. The assistant coach was not named.

The Star reported Thursday that Peters’ suspension was related to his decision to leave the field prematurely following the flag toss. The club viewed that as a team issue, as opposed to the penalty flag toss, which it deemed a league issue that Peters was ultimately fined $24,409 for on Friday.

The NFL Network report cited Peters’ decision to leave the field as a reason for the one-game suspension coach Andy Reid levied on him earlier this week, with the verbal altercation also being a contributing factor.

The Chiefs still had a little over two minutes left to tie the game, and Peters returned to the sideline –– albeit with no socks –– as the offense made its last-gasp attempt. But the drive stalled out, and the Chiefs lost for the sixth time in seven games.

Peters’ suspension means the Oakland native will miss the Chiefs’ showdown Sunday against his hometown Raiders. He was not allowed to practice this week and will forfeit a game check.

FloridaMan88 · 02-21-2018, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

Peters is awesome. But if they get enough for them, any player is tradeable except Mahomes.

The Cleveland Browns strategy... trading talented players who can help you win for draft picks.

The Chiefs will not get equal value in return for a 25 year old Pro Bowl shutdown CB.

**DaneMcCloud** · 02-21-2018, 02:53 PM

https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/j...us-more-notes/

La Canfora Doubles Down: Chiefs might shop Peters

From what I am hearing from other NFL teams, the Chiefs haven't made an overture toward trading Marcus Peters to this point, but other clubs anticipate his name coming up next week at the combine. Owner Clark Hunt has some concerns with Peters' actions last season, as I hear it, and some of his unusual behavior during games, and he might not be long for Kansas City.

This is an extremely talented and impactful player, but one who entered the league with some major red flags, and the Chiefs took their share of character risks in recent years and may have reached a tipping point. Peters is young and cheap and there will certainly be interested clubs should Andy Reid push the trade avenue, and the franchise has certainly been proactive already this winter, reshaping itself by waving goodbye to Derrick Johnson and Darrelle Revis and trading Alex Smith (hard not to wonder if Tamba Hali is next). Would a team like Seattle – who watched Peters play college ball in its backyard and who is often willing to take on risky players and who could need a cheap playmaking corner with its defense being re-shaped this offseason – be among those who make a good potential trade fit?

Peters is a player that other front office execs are talking about right now, regardless, and with the Chiefs fortifying the corner position already, well before the start of the new league year and free agency, perhaps there ends up being fire to this smoke.

**The Franchise** · 02-21-2018, 02:58 PM

Fuller and Amerson are NOT fortifying the CB position. Not if you trade away your #1 CB.

raybec 4 · 02-21-2018, 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Fuller and Amerson are NOT fortifying the CB position. Not if you trade away your #1 CB.

That's the whole point, why would you "fortify" the position just to tear it down a month later? There are a helluva lot of coulds and maybes in there.

O.city · 02-21-2018, 03:03 PM

Sounds like other teams or people think they may move him hit the chiefs haven’t said either way

**The Franchise** · 02-21-2018, 03:09 PM

Quote:

Owner Clark Hunt has some concerns with Peters' actions last season, as I hear it, and some of his unusual behavior during games, and he might not be long for Kansas City.

Well no ****ing shit. You think? I would totally expect Clark to be just peachy keen when one of his players throws a ref's flag and then thinks he's ejected when he's not.

La Canfora has ****ing nothing.

**Easy 6** · 02-21-2018, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

Fuller and Amerson are NOT fortifying the CB position. Not if you trade away your #1 CB.

This is a fact

If they trade Peters, Veach better take that #1 pick and use it on a CB... not only that, but probably even package it with an additional 3rd to move up near the very top to ensure absolute quality

RunKC · 02-21-2018, 03:24 PM

I have a bad feeling that Clark wants to move him due to kneeling.

Edit: sitting, not kneeling

threebag · 02-21-2018, 03:25 PM

It's funny reading post from some people who trash the shit out of a Consummate Pro and defend the shit out of "problem"

**Easy 6** · 02-21-2018, 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I have a bad feeling that Clark wants to move him due to kneeling.

No way man, give Clark more credit for being pragmatic than that

Hell, the uproar wasnt even all that bad at the height of Marcus' kneeling, at least as far as I could tell... IF this happens, it will be because of a mix of financial considerations, and concern about his long term stability after hitting the jackpot

**LoneWolf** · 02-21-2018, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

I have a bad feeling that Clark wants to move him due to kneeling.

What kneeling? Peters never made a big deal about not standing for the anthem and he never kneeled. He sat on the bench behind everyone. If the stupid ****ing cameras would stop following these guys around and making such a big deal out of it, most people would never notice Peters not standing for the anthem.

pugsnotdrugs19 · 02-21-2018, 03:54 PM

I’ll say it again: if they are trading Peters because of Clark’s business/political views, it’s a mistake.

Simply Red · 02-21-2018, 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

I’ll say it again: if they are trading Peters because of Clark’s business/political views, it’s a mistake.

Thank you - I'm glad you said that again.

Nickhead · 02-21-2018, 04:00 PM

all i can say is this: if KC does move on from marcus, it would have to be in line with what KC got for alex, or more.

T-post Tom · 02-21-2018, 04:10 PM

The football world is drunk on speculation. This should be good for a laugh:

Should Jets consider trading for Chiefs' Marcus Peters?

The Jets will have a busy offseason. Should that offseason include a trade for Chiefs cornerback Marcus Peters? Let's take a look at that potential situation.

WHAT COULD PETERS BRING?
He is a very talented player. There's no doubt about that. In his first three NFL seasons, he had eight, six, and five interceptions. He was a Pro Bowler in 2015 and 2016. He was a first-team All-Pro selection in 2016. He has 55 passes defended in his career, including 26 and 20 in his first two seasons. He just turned 25 years old. A lot to like about him.

DO JETS NEED HIM?
Sure, they could use a player of this caliber to fix their sputtering secondary. The Jets' top cornerback last season, Morris Claiborne, is a pending free agent. Ideally, the Jets would bring him back. Releasing underwhelming corner Buster Skrine would free up $6 million in salary cap space for the Jets. So trading for Peters could make a lot of sense, if the Jets are able to re-sign Claiborne. Skrine, in that case, would be even more expendable. Or he could go back to exclusively playing slot corner, which is his better spot anyway.

WHAT ARE CAP RAMIFICATIONS?
Peters is entering the final year of his rookie contract, but his new team could always pick up his fifth-year option for 2019. It's a low-risk move, since the option wouldn't become fully guaranteed until next offseason. Trading Peters would create $1.741 million in salary cap space for the Chiefs, who would eat $1.307 million in dead money. Peters' new team would take on his manageable salary — $1.741 million. And the new team would have Peters' contract rights through 2019, presuming his option gets picked up. So this wouldn't be a one-year rental situation. Rather, a two-year rental, if you will, with a chance to sign Peters to a long-term contract, which obviously wouldn't come cheap.

WHAT WOULD IT COST JETS?
While the cap ramifications of taking on Peters' contract aren't significant — he's a bargain at that $1.741 million salary for 2018, after all — the Jets would have to surrender a draft pick or picks. Remember, the Jets have an extra second-round pick this year, from the Sheldon Richardson/Jermaine Kearse trade that went down just before last season began. So they could perhaps use one of their two second-rounders (No. 37 or 49) to get Peters. The Chiefs might want some more draft picks. They have just five. Their highest is a late second-rounder, No. 54 overall.

WHY WOULD CHIEFS TRADE PETERS?
The Chiefs just got cornerback Kendall Fuller in the Alex Smith trade with Washington. And they signed free agent David Amerson, another corner. So that has led some to speculate about Peters being traded. If the Chiefs anticipate not being able to sign Peters long-term, they might want to get something for him now. He has more value right now than he would next offseason, entering the fifth and final year of his rookie contract, when he would essentially be a one-year rental player, as Richardson was with Seattle in 2017.

ANY RED FLAGS WITH PETERS?
He is an emotional player, which can be a good thing and a bad thing. Jets fans remember Kansas City's loss at MetLife Stadium last year. After he was penalized in that game, Peters picked up the official's flag and threw it into the stands. The Chiefs suspended him for their next game as a result of this stupid, hot-headed display. Oh, and Peters' antics after throwing the flag also included walking to the locker room, even though he wasn't ejected. He eventually returned to the sideline.

WHO ELSE COULD TRADE FOR PETERS?
One team to keep an eye on — the Browns. Remember, Cleveland just hired ex-Chiefs general manager John Dorsey for that same job. Dorsey was the Chiefs' general manager from 2013-16, so he is very familiar with Peters, since he drafted him.

SO SHOULD JETS TRADE FOR PETERS?
They should at least listen to what the Chiefs want, presuming the Chiefs make calls about Peters. (Finally some sanity?) He is too good of a player — despite some of his flaws — for the Jets to just completely dismiss possibly trading for him. The Chiefs could always want too much for Peters. There seems little point in the Jets giving up something crazy like both second-rounders for him. But the Jets' secondary struggled last season, and the group could use a talented player like Peters ... for the right price.

http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2018/02/should_jets_consider_trading_for_marcus_peters.html

12-09-2017, 12:59 PM
Tribal Warfare Man of Culture Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Far Beyond Comprehension Casino cash: $-2817187	Marcus Peters also had verbal altercation with assistant coach Sunday http://amp.kansascity.com/sports/nfl...mpression=true Chiefs cornerback Marcus Peters’ frustration following the Chiefs’ 38-31 loss to the New York Jets didn’t end immediately after the game, it appears. According to a report by NFL Network’s Mike Garafalo, Peters also had a verbal altercation with an assistant coach on the bus during the team’s ride to airport following the game. The assistant coach was not named. The Star reported Thursday that Peters’ suspension was related to his decision to leave the field prematurely following the flag toss. The club viewed that as a team issue, as opposed to the penalty flag toss, which it deemed a league issue that Peters was ultimately fined $24,409 for on Friday. The NFL Network report cited Peters’ decision to leave the field as a reason for the one-game suspension coach Andy Reid levied on him earlier this week, with the verbal altercation also being a contributing factor. The Chiefs still had a little over two minutes left to tie the game, and Peters returned to the sideline –– albeit with no socks –– as the offense made its last-gasp attempt. But the drive stalled out, and the Chiefs lost for the sixth time in seven games. Peters’ suspension means the Oakland native will miss the Chiefs’ showdown Sunday against his hometown Raiders. He was not allowed to practice this week and will forfeit a game check.
Posts: 43,430

02-21-2018, 02:53 PM	#602
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/j...us-more-notes/ La Canfora Doubles Down: Chiefs might shop Peters From what I am hearing from other NFL teams, the Chiefs haven't made an overture toward trading Marcus Peters to this point, but other clubs anticipate his name coming up next week at the combine. Owner Clark Hunt has some concerns with Peters' actions last season, as I hear it, and some of his unusual behavior during games, and he might not be long for Kansas City. This is an extremely talented and impactful player, but one who entered the league with some major red flags, and the Chiefs took their share of character risks in recent years and may have reached a tipping point. Peters is young and cheap and there will certainly be interested clubs should Andy Reid push the trade avenue, and the franchise has certainly been proactive already this winter, reshaping itself by waving goodbye to Derrick Johnson and Darrelle Revis and trading Alex Smith (hard not to wonder if Tamba Hali is next). Would a team like Seattle – who watched Peters play college ball in its backyard and who is often willing to take on risky players and who could need a cheap playmaking corner with its defense being re-shaped this offseason – be among those who make a good potential trade fit? Peters is a player that other front office execs are talking about right now, regardless, and with the Chiefs fortifying the corner position already, well before the start of the new league year and free agency, perhaps there ends up being fire to this smoke.
Posts: 88,960

02-21-2018, 02:58 PM	#603
The Franchise Most Valuable Villain Join Date: Dec 2006 Casino cash: $2075047	Fuller and Amerson are NOT fortifying the CB position. Not if you trade away your #1 CB.
Posts: 92,316

02-21-2018, 03:03 PM	#605
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $-565936	Sounds like other teams or people think they may move him hit the chiefs haven’t said either way
Posts: 84,159	1 0

02-21-2018, 03:24 PM	#608
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $-1460389	I have a bad feeling that Clark wants to move him due to kneeling. Edit: sitting, not kneeling __________________ Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley Last edited by RunKC; 02-21-2018 at 03:46 PM..
Posts: 52,092

02-21-2018, 03:25 PM	#609
threebag Snacks Are Under My Apron Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: The Edge Casino cash: $-932380	It's funny reading post from some people who trash the shit out of a Consummate Pro and defend the shit out of "problem" __________________ Smells like Up Dog in here. RIP HayWire Greatest Almost Mod Ever
Posts: 26,176	0 1

02-21-2018, 03:54 PM	#612
pugsnotdrugs19 SUPER BOWL CHAMPIONS Join Date: Aug 2013 Casino cash: $6629447	I’ll say it again: if they are trading Peters because of Clark’s business/political views, it’s a mistake.
Posts: 29,037	2 0

02-21-2018, 04:00 PM	#614
Nickhead EvOlVeD Join Date: Jun 2016 Location: Blue Mountains, Australia Casino cash: $-750132	all i can say is this: if KC does move on from marcus, it would have to be in line with what KC got for alex, or more.
Posts: 8,534

02-21-2018, 04:10 PM	#615
T-post Tom Busy in a Kohl's restroom Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Milk/Honey/Gazland Casino cash: $1887293	The football world is drunk on speculation. This should be good for a laugh: Should Jets consider trading for Chiefs' Marcus Peters? The Jets will have a busy offseason. Should that offseason include a trade for Chiefs cornerback Marcus Peters? Let's take a look at that potential situation. WHAT COULD PETERS BRING? He is a very talented player. There's no doubt about that. In his first three NFL seasons, he had eight, six, and five interceptions. He was a Pro Bowler in 2015 and 2016. He was a first-team All-Pro selection in 2016. He has 55 passes defended in his career, including 26 and 20 in his first two seasons. He just turned 25 years old. A lot to like about him. DO JETS NEED HIM? Sure, they could use a player of this caliber to fix their sputtering secondary. The Jets' top cornerback last season, Morris Claiborne, is a pending free agent. Ideally, the Jets would bring him back. Releasing underwhelming corner Buster Skrine would free up $6 million in salary cap space for the Jets. So trading for Peters could make a lot of sense, if the Jets are able to re-sign Claiborne. Skrine, in that case, would be even more expendable. Or he could go back to exclusively playing slot corner, which is his better spot anyway. WHAT ARE CAP RAMIFICATIONS? Peters is entering the final year of his rookie contract, but his new team could always pick up his fifth-year option for 2019. It's a low-risk move, since the option wouldn't become fully guaranteed until next offseason. Trading Peters would create $1.741 million in salary cap space for the Chiefs, who would eat $1.307 million in dead money. Peters' new team would take on his manageable salary — $1.741 million. And the new team would have Peters' contract rights through 2019, presuming his option gets picked up. So this wouldn't be a one-year rental situation. Rather, a two-year rental, if you will, with a chance to sign Peters to a long-term contract, which obviously wouldn't come cheap. WHAT WOULD IT COST JETS? While the cap ramifications of taking on Peters' contract aren't significant — he's a bargain at that $1.741 million salary for 2018, after all — the Jets would have to surrender a draft pick or picks. Remember, the Jets have an extra second-round pick this year, from the Sheldon Richardson/Jermaine Kearse trade that went down just before last season began. So they could perhaps use one of their two second-rounders (No. 37 or 49) to get Peters. The Chiefs might want some more draft picks. They have just five. Their highest is a late second-rounder, No. 54 overall. WHY WOULD CHIEFS TRADE PETERS? The Chiefs just got cornerback Kendall Fuller in the Alex Smith trade with Washington. And they signed free agent David Amerson, another corner. So that has led some to speculate about Peters being traded. If the Chiefs anticipate not being able to sign Peters long-term, they might want to get something for him now. He has more value right now than he would next offseason, entering the fifth and final year of his rookie contract, when he would essentially be a one-year rental player, as Richardson was with Seattle in 2017. ANY RED FLAGS WITH PETERS? He is an emotional player, which can be a good thing and a bad thing. Jets fans remember Kansas City's loss at MetLife Stadium last year. After he was penalized in that game, Peters picked up the official's flag and threw it into the stands. The Chiefs suspended him for their next game as a result of this stupid, hot-headed display. Oh, and Peters' antics after throwing the flag also included walking to the locker room, even though he wasn't ejected. He eventually returned to the sideline. WHO ELSE COULD TRADE FOR PETERS? One team to keep an eye on — the Browns. Remember, Cleveland just hired ex-Chiefs general manager John Dorsey for that same job. Dorsey was the Chiefs' general manager from 2013-16, so he is very familiar with Peters, since he drafted him. SO SHOULD JETS TRADE FOR PETERS? They should at least listen to what the Chiefs want, presuming the Chiefs make calls about Peters. (Finally some sanity?) He is too good of a player — despite some of his flaws — for the Jets to just completely dismiss possibly trading for him. The Chiefs could always want too much for Peters. There seems little point in the Jets giving up something crazy like both second-rounders for him. But the Jets' secondary struggled last season, and the group could use a talented player like Peters ... for the right price. http://www.nj.com/jets/index.ssf/2018/02/should_jets_consider_trading_for_marcus_peters.html __________________ You seem nice!
Posts: 22,290