A word of caution !!!! - Page 5

Logical · 03:19 PM

It would be easy to get to enthused from this game, remember we crushed Atlanta last year and we were still a bad team defensively.

We appear to be improved but history with this team tells me not to get overconfident.

2nd our offense only looked good in the first quarter and we looked pretty weak thereafter.

We have to get healthy or we could lose to Oakland next Sunday night.

Logical · 09-12-2005, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SCTrojan

We've all learned throughout the years that Chiefs' successes early don't necessarily translate to success late. Especially when it comes to the defense in the last three years.

The most encouraging sign was the number of players making big plays on defense. If that keeps up, I think we'll be all right.

I 100% agree with the point and content of this post.

htismaqe · 09-12-2005, 03:23 PM

People just aren't ready to break it down yet.

I posted my post-game thoughts and got a pretty similar response...

Roy posted that the defense sucks, so he got something MUCH worse than this.

Calcountry · 09-12-2005, 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beavis

A lot of reasons to be concerned about the D. I think the near shutout was as much a product of the Jets sucking ass as us being better. They dropped a ton of passes, not to mention being unable to snap the ball. That being said, the run D looked greatly improved. I'm not doing cartwheels yet, but they did look a lot better.

The most glaring example of improvement was the tackling. The Jets did not break many tackles. The team pursuit to the ball was improved as well.

Good things happen when you work hard and play better fundamentals. Look for the holdovers from last year to step up their games as well.

The Chiefs D this year have an attitude. I think they are tired of being teh suck. I am Surtain, that Gunther is.

Red Dawg · 09-12-2005, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BoseWolf

If we could pull out 1 win in the next 3 weeks we're in good shape. If we get 2 I'd be exstatic.

I totally agree. If we can go 2-2 in these first four then we are in good shape. 3-1 would be great shape.

Logical · 09-18-2005, 12:29 AM

Well the good news is Surtain and TRich should play. Sucks that Roaf is not supposed to play.

I still have hopes that we will win though and in fact now feel we have an 80 percent chance given Surtain does play.

09-11-2005, 08:47 PM
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	A word of caution !!!! It would be easy to get to enthused from this game, remember we crushed Atlanta last year and we were still a bad team defensively. We appear to be improved but history with this team tells me not to get overconfident. 2nd our offense only looked good in the first quarter and we looked pretty weak thereafter. We have to get healthy or we could lose to Oakland next Sunday night. Last edited by Logical; 09-12-2005 at 03:19 PM..
Posts: 31,579

09-12-2005, 03:23 PM	#62
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8049900	People just aren't ready to break it down yet. I posted my post-game thoughts and got a pretty similar response... Roy posted that the defense sucks, so he got something MUCH worse than this.
Posts: 104,529

09-18-2005, 12:29 AM	#65
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Well the good news is Surtain and TRich should play. Sucks that Roaf is not supposed to play. I still have hopes that we will win though and in fact now feel we have an 80 percent chance given Surtain does play.
Posts: 31,579