Quest for a new OC.

[Micjones]

2010 brings some excitement with it considering all of the smoke these 'Crennel to KC' rumors we've been hearing lately. The organization would be remiss not to bring in an equally strong Offensive Coordinator to relieve Haley of his duties.

Who might be available for the job in the off-season?

Charlie Weis, La Canfora seems to think KC will be his eventual landing spot but this one hasn't been corroborated by as many sources. In fact, I think he's currently the only source speculating that this will happen. Weis would be particularly beneficial to the growth of our 60-million-dollar man Matt Cassel. Can he and Pioli play nice?

Rob Chudzinski, Currently an assistant head coach for the Bolts. He had a hand in the Top 10 offense that the Browns fielded in 2007. Derek Anderson, Kellen Winslow, Jr. and Braylon Edwards all posted their best single-season efforts with him at the playcalling helm. He's coached (and helped) some uber-talented TE's over the years.

Who else is out there?

I thought maybe Kyle Shanahan would shake loose from Houston, but it looks like Kubiak's going to retain his job.

...discuss.

[BossChief]

oops

[BossChief]

<----had a few drinks

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

You seem a little blind.

You're right.

Weiss should have done better by Matt.

[BossChief]

Matt Claussen FTW!!!!!!!elevty1111!!!!!!

[jAZ]

Originally Posted by Sam Hall

Quite a few of those opponents won't be a whole lot better than us, if at all.

The NFL, if it does nothing at all, proves again and again that expectedly strong teams turn out to be disappointing while expectedly bad teams turn out to be surprisingly good.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by jAZ

The NFL, if it does nothing at all, proves again and again that expectedly strong teams turn out to be disappointing while expectedly bad teams turn out to be surprisingly good.

Who were the bad teams that were good this year?

I think you're reaching, big time.

The same teams, year in and year out are good.

The "bad" teams are consistently bad.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Who were the bad teams that were good this year?

I think you're reaching, big time.

The same teams, year in and year out are good.

The "bad" teams are consistently bad.

Miami, Pittsburgh, New York, Atlanta weren't good as they were last year.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Dane, that was painful to see. It was like someone trying to use the wrong tool and busting their nuckle.

If you want to respond to multiple posts, hit the " icon on each post you want to respond to and when you have them all clicked (you can even quote posts from other threads) then hit "post reply" and then do it all on one page. (if you have posts from other threads quoted, you have to click on select other qoutes from below the box.


as for the topic:

Sam Hall...what planet are you from and how long have you been watching football.

Billay...they arent starting next season in a couple weeks, the bad teams on that list will be different teams by the time we play each other. To say this and this will happen because of what happened this year is a HUGE stretch.

ralphy boy...San Fran is a MUCH better team than we are and has two first round picks to deal with among their other picks, they will be much improved.

KC11111110..."im honestly starting to think we might end up promoting someone from within to OC next yr. the offense is just starting to click, and to start fresh albeit at the right time (during the offseason & not in the preseason) would probably set the offense back shich is not what we need again"

this is your best post I have read to date, and its not very good. That said, we will hire a new OC and he will run Haleys offense. I would bet real money that guy is Weiss.

BossChief the Raiders have lost 10+ games for how many years now? The Broncos have sucked the 2nd half of the season for how many years now? These teams are consistant at sucking.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by billay

BossChief the Raiders have lost 10+ games for how many years now? The Broncos have sucked the 2nd half of the season for how many years now? These teams are consistant at sucking.

The Raiders are a qb away from being a pretty good team.

The Broncos are a couple players away from being a top five draft pick squad.

One day after the season ends is not the right place to start proclaiming which games are wins and losses next year.

Thats my point.

I didnt mean it as an attack, apart from your views on Carr (which I know, he shit the bed) Pollard and Mike Brown..I value most of your additions.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by billay

Miami, Pittsburgh, New York, Atlanta weren't good as they were last year.

Look up my predictions: I said that Miami wouldn't be 8-8 this year.

Pittburgh fell off due to injuries after a Super Bowl season.

The Giants lost their defensive coordinator and tried to break in two rookie wide receivers.

Atlanta was devastated by injuries.

All of those teams you mentioned with the exception of Miami finished 9-7.

And will all of that being sad, none of those teams were "bad".

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by BossChief

The Raiders are a qb away from being a pretty good team.

The Broncos are a couple players away from being a top five draft pick squad.

One day after the season ends is not the right place to start proclaiming which games are wins and losses next year.

Thats my point.

I didnt mean it as an attack, apart from your views on Carr (which I know, he shit the bed) Pollard and Mike Brown..I value most of your additions.

Thanks BossChief but part of the reason Cable is getting fired is because he dissed Jamarcus Russell. Whoever the new coach is will have to play Jamarcus and thats why Al Davis needs to sell the team.

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Look up my predictions: I said that Miami wouldn't be 8-8 this year.

Pittburgh fell off due to injuries after a Super Bowl season.

The Giants lost their defensive coordinator and tried to break in two rookie wide receivers.

Atlanta was devastated by injuries.

All of those teams you mentioned with the exception of Miami finished 9-7.

And will all of that being sad, none of those teams were "bad".

I disagree. Losing to KC, Cleveland, and Oakland during the stretch of the season is bad. The Giants? They got there ass kicked the last few games. Injuries happen and good teams overcome them. If Pioli makes some good moves theres no reason this team can't win 4 more games next year and that atleast puts them in competition for the playoffs.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by billay

I disagree. Losing to KC, Cleveland, and Oakland during the stretch of the season is bad. The Giants? They got there ass kicked the last few games. Injuries happen and good teams overcome them. If Pioli makes some good moves theres no reason this team can't win 4 more games next year and that atleast puts them in competition for the playoffs.

So you're going on record as saying that 9-7 teams are bad?

Is that correct?

[Titty Meat]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

So you're going on record as saying that 9-7 teams are bad?

Is that correct?

9-7 is meh. Are you going to say the 2006 Chiefs were a "good" team?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by billay

9-7 is meh. Are you going to say the 2006 Chiefs were a "good" team?

Wait a second:

You stated that Pittburgh, the NY Giants, Atlanta and Miami were quote "Bad teams".

No where did *I* state they were good teams this season. But a 9-7 team isn't a "bad team".

Do you know what's bad, Bill?

1-15. 2-14. 3-13. 4-12. 5-11.

Those are BAD teams.

As for the 2006 Chiefs? Herm ****ed up. The Chiefs would have had a MUCH better chance of winning in Indy with Huard, who moved the team offensively better than Green, who was clearly shot at that point.