Peter King: Chiefs called all 31 teams about Peters, 28 passed or offered little

[pugsnotdrugs19]

Since everything negative on the Chiefs side seems to get its own thread...

The Chiefs called all 31 other teams about Marcus Peters. 28 took a hard pass or offered nothing of value. @SI_PeterKing on why Kansas City moved on from its star cornerback: https://t.co/EAVdfM504G pic.twitter.com/ppLh2tJQlg

— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) February 27, 2018

STORY BELOW

For the Chiefs, Marcus Peters Wasn’t Worth the Trouble—and Only Three Other Teams Had Any Interest

Spoiler!

Peter King
February 27th, 2018

Day by day, we learn more about the Chiefs-Rams trade that netted Los Angeles a 25-year-old star cornerback, Marcus Peters. On Monday, Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reported the terms of the deal: Kansas City dealt Peters to Los Angeles for a fourth-round pick this year (the 124th overall pick) and a second-round pick next year.

The compensation, even for a problem player like Peters, seemed light to me. The Rams won 11 games in 2017, and if they win a similar number next year, they’d likely have a second-round pick in the low 50s. So, let’s say Peters was acquired for the 124th pick in 2018 and 58th pick in 2019.

Seems like the Rams got a heck of a deal for a 25-year-old turnover-creating machine who’s been named to two Pro Bowls in his three seasons and was All-Pro in 2016.

Now I’ll tell you a few reasons why the compensation was as light as it was:

• I’m told the Chiefs called all 31 other teams in the league this month on Peters, looking for a trade partner, and 28 teams either said they were not interested or did not make an offer of any value. For a player with the playing history of Peters at a vital and hard-to-fill position, that’s amazing. One team made an offer of a mid-round pick, laughable for a player of Peters’ age and stature. (My guess is that was Cleveland or Indianapolis.) Two were in it until the end—the Rams and 49ers. And the Rams’ offer of second- and fourth-round picks was evidently better than San Francisco’s.

• The fact that a GM who knew Peters very well—Indianapolis’ Chris Ballard—did not pursue Peters hard for the Colts this month was viewed as telling by several other teams in the league. Ballard was the Chiefs’ director of player personnel in 2015, and visited Peters and his parents that spring at their Oakland home, before the draft. He was in favor of the Chiefs picking Peters, which they did in the first round of the 2015 draft, 18th overall. Clearly, Ballard would have a pipeline to the inner feelings of the Chiefs, and when he didn’t engage the Chiefs seriously, one source close to the deal said it was a telling sign. However, there is one counterpoint to this: Because the Colts are in full rebuilding mode, they’re not a great fit right now for a very good player who could be a handful, and who could leave in free agency in two years.

• Those around the Chiefs saw there was life after Marcus. The team played one of its best defensive games of the season last year without Peters. He got suspended for a game by the Chiefs for freaking out on the field in a Week 13 loss at the Jets, throwing a penalty flag into the stands and stalking off the field while the game was in play though he had not been ejected. The next week, without Peters, Kansas City held Oakland to 104 total yards and no points through 48 minutes, building up a 26-0 lead. The Chiefs won the game, 26-15.

• The fact that the Chiefs were calling every team in the league about Peters let teams know that Kansas City coach Andy Reid and GM Brett Veach were desperate to dump him.

• Peters’ behavior had become erratic, apparently, capped by the Week 13 meltdown in the Meadowlands. The Chiefs decided they couldn’t trust his behavior anymore and, despite his playmaking ability, felt whatever they could fetch for him in trade would be better than Peters returning in 2018.

• His protests during the national anthem didn’t help—at various points he raised his fist, sat on the bench and stayed in the locker room—but weren’t the driving force behind a trade.

• Peters loves football. He practiced hard in Kansas City. But his tendency to lose it was a divisive part of his résumé too, and a big reason why the Chiefs dumped him.

So, did the Rams make a bad trade?

I don’t think so. The Rams have a defensive coordinator, Wade Phillips, who has handled high-maintenance players, and who puts great cover corners like Peters in position to maximize their ability and earning power. Peters is due $10.7 million over the next two years, very reasonable for a player who at his peak is a shutdown cornerback and one of the best in the league. So even if the Rams don’t keep him after 2019, they’ve (theoretically) paid $10.7 million over two years for a cornerback who should be supremely motivated to be great. It’s the only way he’s going to get paid Revis money.

In the end, Peters’ temper and disposition probably cost him a long career in Kansas City. But talent always gets a second chance (and a third, if the talent is as big as Peters’), and the Rams are betting that Sean McVay and Phillips and a more forgiving environment will be a good new start for a very good player.

[T-post Tom]

Chris Mortensen reporting that Rams' equipment manager ordering record amount of team game socks. "Just in case."

[JakeF]

Everyone passed but a team that Peters liked and was out of conference for the Chiefs?

Convenient for such a desperate situation.

[Rain Man]

Originally Posted by saphojunkie

I would bet Reid called Gruden, yeah.

And why not call Elway? He might offer you 12 1st round picks, and if he doesn't offer you anything you can tell all of the other teams, "Hey, Elway doesn't want him so that must mean he's good."

[3rd&Long]

Peters' value is also tied to his contract length or, in his case, one more season with an option for one more. Teams will assess the chances of extending him, the likely amount of that 2d contract amount along with the current sum of his remaining rook contract which impacts his trade value just as it does with all these MLB teams do when they go shopping in the trade market.

All this is taken into account before the character issues of the player are factored in. Given these considerations, I'd say the Chiefs got a fairly (not GREAT) but fairly good return for dumping a guy who has now been fired from his college and pro teams. Good luck with that LAR. Good riddance to Peters BTW.

[Iowanian]

I don't blame Peters, it's a lot easier to slip over on saturday morning and choke your mom if you're in the same state than to have to take a plane.

the teams that passed did what he does when he passes a tackle opportunity....avoided the contact with potential problems and made a 'business decision' do avoid contact.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by tooge

Peters is shit. He doesn't tackle. He's a great coverage corner that creates turnovers often by stripping the ball while other guys are actually tackling the runner. He literally gets out ofthe way of contact. How many third downs the past two seasons could the D actually gotten off the field when Peters just moved out of the way. Good riddance you POS

I'd like you to give me the list of great tackling CB's the vast majority of them don't do it. Peters just isn't very good at making it look good like some of the other guys but yea most CB's are shitty tacklers and try to avoid it.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by MGRS13

And yet had they waited till training camp and preseason some one would have been injured on another team or suspended or even some team would have convinced itself it was one player away and the Chiefs would have gotten much more for him. Instead mr. Marge schott wanted to run home to Texas and brag at his next klan rally that he got rid of " one of those guys". This team is a joke.

What. The...

[rabblerouser]

Marcus Peters is the Jeff George of Cornerbacks.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Iowanian

I don't blame Peters, it's a lot easier to slip over on saturday morning and choke your mom if you're in the same state than to have to take a plane.

the teams that passed did what he does when he passes a tackle opportunity....avoided the contact with potential problems and made a 'business decision' do avoid contact.

Can't be mad at them.

[dls6501]

Originally Posted by tooge

Peters is shit. He doesn't tackle. He's a great coverage corner that creates turnovers often by stripping the ball while other guys are actually tackling the runner. He literally gets out ofthe way of contact. How many third downs the past two seasons could the D actually gotten off the field when Peters just moved out of the way. Good riddance you POS

Prove it. I would be willing to bet whatever you want that you couldnt find more than a couple of these instances, if any.

[Baby Lee]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

Can't be mad at them.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2

People keep saying "off field issues", yet he hasn't been arrested or suspended or investigated for anything.

Getting into it with fans on the sideline, fighting with coaches on the team bus, pushing your mom in the locker etc...

Those are "off the field issues".

[Red Dawg]

Give Veach a pass on this one. He did what he could. We have some cash so lets see what he does before we declare the season over already

[Ming the Merciless]

thats odd , i would think they would only tell 2 or 3 to minimize the number of teams who knew he was on the market and to ensure we got jack shit for him

[Randallflagg]

Originally Posted by pugsnotdrugs19

Since everything negative on the Chiefs side seems to get its own thread...

The Chiefs called all 31 other teams about Marcus Peters. 28 took a hard pass or offered nothing of value. @SI_PeterKing on why Kansas City moved on from its star cornerback: https://t.co/EAVdfM504G pic.twitter.com/ppLh2tJQlg

— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) February 27, 2018

STORY BELOW

For the Chiefs, Marcus Peters Wasn’t Worth the Trouble—and Only Three Other Teams Had Any Interest

Spoiler!

Peter King
February 27th, 2018

Day by day, we learn more about the Chiefs-Rams trade that netted Los Angeles a 25-year-old star cornerback, Marcus Peters. On Monday, Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reported the terms of the deal: Kansas City dealt Peters to Los Angeles for a fourth-round pick this year (the 124th overall pick) and a second-round pick next year.

The compensation, even for a problem player like Peters, seemed light to me. The Rams won 11 games in 2017, and if they win a similar number next year, they’d likely have a second-round pick in the low 50s. So, let’s say Peters was acquired for the 124th pick in 2018 and 58th pick in 2019.

Seems like the Rams got a heck of a deal for a 25-year-old turnover-creating machine who’s been named to two Pro Bowls in his three seasons and was All-Pro in 2016.

Now I’ll tell you a few reasons why the compensation was as light as it was:

• I’m told the Chiefs called all 31 other teams in the league this month on Peters, looking for a trade partner, and 28 teams either said they were not interested or did not make an offer of any value. For a player with the playing history of Peters at a vital and hard-to-fill position, that’s amazing. One team made an offer of a mid-round pick, laughable for a player of Peters’ age and stature. (My guess is that was Cleveland or Indianapolis.) Two were in it until the end—the Rams and 49ers. And the Rams’ offer of second- and fourth-round picks was evidently better than San Francisco’s.

• The fact that a GM who knew Peters very well—Indianapolis’ Chris Ballard—did not pursue Peters hard for the Colts this month was viewed as telling by several other teams in the league. Ballard was the Chiefs’ director of player personnel in 2015, and visited Peters and his parents that spring at their Oakland home, before the draft. He was in favor of the Chiefs picking Peters, which they did in the first round of the 2015 draft, 18th overall. Clearly, Ballard would have a pipeline to the inner feelings of the Chiefs, and when he didn’t engage the Chiefs seriously, one source close to the deal said it was a telling sign. However, there is one counterpoint to this: Because the Colts are in full rebuilding mode, they’re not a great fit right now for a very good player who could be a handful, and who could leave in free agency in two years.

• Those around the Chiefs saw there was life after Marcus. The team played one of its best defensive games of the season last year without Peters. He got suspended for a game by the Chiefs for freaking out on the field in a Week 13 loss at the Jets, throwing a penalty flag into the stands and stalking off the field while the game was in play though he had not been ejected. The next week, without Peters, Kansas City held Oakland to 104 total yards and no points through 48 minutes, building up a 26-0 lead. The Chiefs won the game, 26-15.

• The fact that the Chiefs were calling every team in the league about Peters let teams know that Kansas City coach Andy Reid and GM Brett Veach were desperate to dump him.

• Peters’ behavior had become erratic, apparently, capped by the Week 13 meltdown in the Meadowlands. The Chiefs decided they couldn’t trust his behavior anymore and, despite his playmaking ability, felt whatever they could fetch for him in trade would be better than Peters returning in 2018.

• His protests during the national anthem didn’t help—at various points he raised his fist, sat on the bench and stayed in the locker room—but weren’t the driving force behind a trade.

• Peters loves football. He practiced hard in Kansas City. But his tendency to lose it was a divisive part of his résumé too, and a big reason why the Chiefs dumped him.

So, did the Rams make a bad trade?

I don’t think so. The Rams have a defensive coordinator, Wade Phillips, who has handled high-maintenance players, and who puts great cover corners like Peters in position to maximize their ability and earning power. Peters is due $10.7 million over the next two years, very reasonable for a player who at his peak is a shutdown cornerback and one of the best in the league. So even if the Rams don’t keep him after 2019, they’ve (theoretically) paid $10.7 million over two years for a cornerback who should be supremely motivated to be great. It’s the only way he’s going to get paid Revis money.

In the end, Peters’ temper and disposition probably cost him a long career in Kansas City. But talent always gets a second chance (and a third, if the talent is as big as Peters’), and the Rams are betting that Sean McVay and Phillips and a more forgiving environment will be a good new start for a very good player.

Honestly, without knowing the truth, I can easily believe this. The NFL is no different than any other large corporation. Once the word gets out on someone, no matter how "talented" he may or may not be - that person is black-balled (so to speak). It's not hard to believe that most teams were questioned about the prospect of a "trade" and most passed outright, knowing the baggage that this player carries with him.

I truly believe that Peters will be on his best behavior - year one. The jury is out, however, on the years after that. Time will tell.