Chiefs Did anyone see the pass interference on the 5th down at the end of the game? - Page 6

Programmer · 09-07-2008, 02:00 PM

It was an obvious foul, but the Chiefs got 5 downs at the end of the game.

**SAUTO** · 09-07-2008, 03:46 PM

ok so its the espnzone and cbs scene whats the diff?

triple · 09-07-2008, 03:47 PM

in today's ticky-tack NFL, it could have been called, but it would have been a weak call.

**Lzen** · 09-07-2008, 04:22 PM

It was a penalty. It should have been PI. Or, at the very least, illegal contact. Either way, it should have been 1st down for the Chiefs. Of course, if dipshit Huard had thrown a better pass, Bowe would have had a better shot and not have to rely on the ref to make a call.

And for anyone who still does not get it, the Chiefs did not get 5 downs. Dierdorf explained it if you had been listening to the CBS broadcast. NE called a time out right before the Chiefs snapped it on 1st down. Therefore, that down did not count. This place would have really melted down if we had scored a TD and then it not being counted due to the TO.

Hammock Parties · 09-07-2008, 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Quit bitching about the hold. It's not like we didn't have 4 plays to get it in.

4 ****ing plays and we didnt even gain a ****ing yard... Herm will never learn, no matter who we got at OC... He gets no slack from me this year at all.

And yes, that was a pass interference, and it was very blatant. He held his fooking arms down.

sedated · 09-07-2008, 04:42 PM

if the roles were reversed and Flowers held Moss in the endzone, it would have been a flag no doubt.

but that's still no excuse - produce in 4 downs or go home with your head down.

Programmer · 09-07-2008, 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossOrphan

Bitching about penalties is a sign of weakness. No ref makes that call on the last play of the game if he wants to keep his job.

Only if it's the pats.

**Skip Towne** · 09-07-2008, 04:45 PM

We wouldn't have scored if they gave us 8 downs. Thanks, Herm.

KCJohnny · 09-07-2008, 10:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

who cares how many other chances there were he held bowe's arms down in the endzone that's pass interference

I just saw the replay for the first time. Bowe's arms are CLEARLY being held down before the ball arrives.

Blown call.

09-07-2008, 02:00 PM
Programmer Banned Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: USA Casino cash: $10004900	Did anyone see the pass interference on the 5th down at the end of the game? It was an obvious foul, but the Chiefs got 5 downs at the end of the game.
Posts: 3,863

09-07-2008, 03:46 PM	#76
SAUTO Shit Join Date: Jun 2008 Casino cash: $10039067	ok so its the espnzone and cbs scene whats the diff?
Posts: 55,715

09-07-2008, 03:47 PM	#77
triple Stop saying &quot;This.&quot; Join Date: Aug 2008 Casino cash: $10004900	in today's ticky-tack NFL, it could have been called, but it would have been a weak call.
Posts: 2,110

09-07-2008, 04:22 PM	#78
Lzen Supporter Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Jan Quadrant Vincent 16 Casino cash: $1870692	It was a penalty. It should have been PI. Or, at the very least, illegal contact. Either way, it should have been 1st down for the Chiefs. Of course, if dipshit Huard had thrown a better pass, Bowe would have had a better shot and not have to rely on the ref to make a call. And for anyone who still does not get it, the Chiefs did not get 5 downs. Dierdorf explained it if you had been listening to the CBS broadcast. NE called a time out right before the Chiefs snapped it on 1st down. Therefore, that down did not count. This place would have really melted down if we had scored a TD and then it not being counted due to the TO. __________________ If at first you don't succeed ...skydiving is not for you.
Posts: 41,497

09-07-2008, 04:45 PM	#82
Skip Towne Supporter Join Date: Apr 2001 Location: T-Town Casino cash: $10004900	We wouldn't have scored if they gave us 8 downs. Thanks, Herm.
Posts: 69,689