Chiefs Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. - Page 612

**SAUTO** · 11-20-2013, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs

Only a true potato could translate "needs perfection" out of that post. Yeah, you can GTFO dumbass.

really?

why should everything else have to get fixed to evaluate the most important position on the field?

**SAUTO** · 11-20-2013, 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheUte

So exactly when does it become not a Alexuse or us homers making shit up.

When does dropped passes actually affect the outcome of the game and O-line actually matter to you?

Apparently no one the 53 man roster count for anything.

You GTFO, it all counts you can't hang shit on one player its just stupidity to try.

you are another dumbass.

and niners fans on a chiefs board telling a life long chiefs fan to gtfo is classic.

****ing idiots.

**alpha_omega** · 11-20-2013, 12:27 PM

Just thought i would check in and see how the "alex will always suck" thread is going.

Carry on.

ChiefsCountry · 11-20-2013, 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

really?

why should everything else have to get fixed to evaluate the most important position on the field?

This.

OL - Alex Smith takes a bunch of sacks. Did in San Fran and does in KC as well. He is taking more than Cassel did. Clearly its the OL fault.

WR - Drops. Apparently not dropping the ball that much when Charles is the main cause.

Guess where the blame should be directed at for the offensive struggles. #11.

**SAUTO** · 11-20-2013, 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

This.

OL - Alex Smith takes a bunch of sacks. Did in San Fran and does in KC as well. He is taking more than Cassel did. Clearly its the OL fault.

WR - Drops. Apparently not dropping the ball that much when Charles is the main cause.

Guess where the blame should be directed at for the offensive struggles. #11.

funniest post of the year was maverick's about kaepernick.

"Its not the oline, its not the wrs, its not the oc or the playcalling, its all on kaepernick"

but swap positions and its everything BUT alex smith.

**** all these guys.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 11-20-2013, 12:32 PM

"It's a team game" is a classic excuse for Alex.

Nevermind that many of the same people who use that excuse claim that Denver would suck without Manning.

Can't have it both ways.

jd1020 · 11-20-2013, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

"It's a team game" is a classic excuse for Alex.

Nevermind that many of the same people who use that excuse claim that Denver would suck without Manning.

Can't have it both ways.

Denver would be just as good with Alex Smith as they are with Peyton Manning. Both QBs are just managing the game.

**SAUTO** · 11-20-2013, 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

"It's a team game" is a classic excuse for Alex.

Nevermind that many of the same people who use that excuse claim that Denver would suck without Manning.

Can't have it both ways.

like I said these guys are ****ing idiot hypocrites

Jakemall · 11-20-2013, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

.

if everything else is perfect THEN and ONLY THEN could it maybe be alex smith's fault

GTFO

But the reverse is true?

Jakemall · 11-20-2013, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence

You should actually be going off of his drop percentage. 3.5%......less than A.J. Green and Calvin Johnson.

His percentage of targets caught is 57.9%....higher than Green and Johnson.

Who's "he"? We were talking about a team stat.

Jakemall · 11-20-2013, 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bearcat

The Vikings passing game really is the model for what you can do when receivers don't drop passes.

And Denver goes from a spot ahead of the Chiefs to 5 spots below... oh noes.

4th vs 10th?

you don't think that's quite a bit different? Especially when you consider that one is a future hall of fame QB and the other is a good QB at best?

jd1020 · 11-20-2013, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall

4th vs 10th?

you don't think that's quite a bit different? Especially when you consider that one is a future hall of fame QB and the other is a good QB at best?

I wouldn't say Peyton Manning is a "good QB at best."

**The Franchise** · 11-20-2013, 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall

Who's "he"? We were talking about a team stat.

Bowe. Everyone wants to complain that he drops everything. Look at the stats....he ****ing doesn't.

**Bearcat** · 11-20-2013, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakemall

4th vs 10th?

you don't think that's quite a bit different? Especially when you consider that one is a future hall of fame QB and the other is a good QB at best?

A difference of 0.7%.

Broncos -- 410 * .056 = 22.96 drops

Do the same for the Chiefs.... 410 * .063 = 25.83

So, no, I don't think those 3 drops over 10 games is quite a difference. Considering one is a HoF QB and the other is Alex Smith AND considering the Smith fans' argument that it's the receivers' fault, I'd expect the Broncos' percentage to be much lower.

You can't argue the offense is being held down by drops more than Smith's play AND argue the Broncos' stat is better because of Peyton Manning.

**Bearcat** · 11-20-2013, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020

I wouldn't say Peyton Manning is a "good QB at best."

Nice.

02-27-2013, 12:45 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $760478	Alex Smith did, does, and will always suck. Last edited by Hammock Parties; 03-02-2013 at 09:39 PM..
Posts: 297,545

11-20-2013, 12:27 PM	#9168
alpha_omega Supporter Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Liberty Casino cash: $-1830000	Just thought i would check in and see how the "alex will always suck" thread is going. Carry on.
Posts: 17,352

11-20-2013, 12:32 PM	#9171
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2051115	"It's a team game" is a classic excuse for Alex. Nevermind that many of the same people who use that excuse claim that Denver would suck without Manning. Can't have it both ways.
Posts: 60,758