|
![]() |
#91 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
Neither Damon or Brodie are going to look good on 2nd and long, or 3rd and long...that's just not how our offense is built to work. |
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#92 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#93 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scott City KS
Casino cash: $-1705266
|
Quote:
You keep touting that we are in first place, and we are a missed FG out of last. We're not exactly dominating while riding the wave of Huard's arm. I am happy as hell we beat the living shit out of SD. Then we beat the Faders. That's awesome. We are in first place in the division. That is fan fuggin tastic. I love it. If we make it to the playoffs, I hope we can go in and beat somebody. If we play the Patriots, I hope we beat the hell out of them. But I still feel like Brodie should start for the Chiefs, based on the horribly limited comparison between the two. If he is so bad, they should have cut him and brought in a vet backup. |
|
Posts: 60,053
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#94 | |
**** That Noise
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jack Trice
Casino cash: $3006954
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
Posts: 15,126
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#95 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parkville MO
Casino cash: $10005170
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 54,695
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#96 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
EITHER WAY, Huard also had a running back who was consistently picking up first downs...he doesn't exactly have that this year. Huard signed a 7.5 million dollar contract, LJ signed a 50 million dollar contract. Who do you think is suppose to be carrying this offense? Huard is in there to manage the game and not **** up, and he's done a FINE job of that this year...his fumbles are WAY down and he still takes WAY LESS sacks than any QB should behind this offensive line. Croyle has potential, but I rather see that potential behind a revamped offensive line...honestly, I figured we'd start 1-3 and turn the team over to Croyle...but that didn't happen and we are 2-0 in the AFC West, have 4 of our next 5 at home, and we're sitting in 1st place. Time to drop the Croyle bullshit and get behind Huard and the Chiefs. Aren't we all Chiefs fans here? |
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#97 |
**** That Noise
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jack Trice
Casino cash: $3006954
|
O yea I'm a Chiefs fan, but not a Damon fan. I honestly don't see Croyle having any more INT's right now had he played than what Huard has. Croyle is used to playing in an offense where he doesn't **** up the the defense does the rest. He is used to a shitty line, and he has way more talent and mobility than Huard. I wouldn't have a problem with his waiting on the bench if it was because there is a good QB here, but there isn't. We need a QB that can some what make up for LJ's and the lines poor performance, we don't know for sure if its Croyle YET, but we do know it isn't Damon Horrid.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 15,126
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#98 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
and besides, the quicker fans like you deal with Huard being the QB, the more enjoyable the season will get, because do you REALLY think a 1st place team is going to make a QB switch? NOT GONNA HAPPEN |
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#99 | |
The Insider
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lake of the Ozarks
Casino cash: $-1701248
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 52,232
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#100 |
**** That Noise
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jack Trice
Casino cash: $3006954
|
I really enjoy being in first, I love SOME of the plays Damon has made, but I just hate how bad the offense is doing. I honestly don't think the Chiefs can STAY in first the way the offense is playing though. We usually do good coming out of the bye, and if the offense can get something going, then I can live another year with Huard. Until the offense gets going, I want Croyle.
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 15,126
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#101 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#102 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
that and we'll have every tiebreaker for once which is nice...2-0 in the west with both games being on the road is HUGE.
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#103 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Parkville MO
Casino cash: $10005170
|
Quote:
I was talking about that going into last week's game. |
|
Posts: 54,695
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#104 |
**** That Noise
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Jack Trice
Casino cash: $3006954
|
Is it true that KC is the only team in the NFL that Brett Favre has never beaten? I really like us coming out of the bye week against them, I think we have a very good chance at beating them, I just hope they win this weekend first!
__________________
![]() |
Posts: 15,126
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#105 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, Texas
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Quote:
|
|
Posts: 56,356
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|