Chiefs I like what Haley did yesterday... - Page 7

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 07:36 AM

3 yards rushing in the 1st half? No, you are going to run the ****ing ball. You are not going to be allowed to drop back and watch your QB get killed because you can't run the ****ing ball. It is similar to making a hitter lay a bunt down with 2 strikes after he couldn't do it on strikes 1 and 2.

Fatlock can cry that Haley isn't treating them like men all he wants. He needs to stick to his doublestuffs. This team isn't going to compete for a playoff spot anyway so this is exactly the time to pull stunts like this. You want to win? You have to learn how to block. You have to learn how to run the ball. 3 ****ing yards in 1 half is pathetic and I don't blame Haley one bit for what he did.

It isn't like we had 30 yards in the 1st half..we had 3. Three. Unacceptable, PERIOD! Dropping back to pass would have resulted in Cassel being broken into pieces.

I don't know what game Fatlock and some others watched, but I saw one that showed me our O line was there in name only. Had we dropped back, which is exactly what Philly wanted, we would be cussing about the picks Cassel threw or the fact that Brokie would be the starter for the next several weeks cause of Cassel being hurt.

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

If the coaches believed the game was over at 21-7, every single one of them should be fired today. Immediately.

Well, you don't know what they thought. But the fact is just about everyone who watched the game knew it was.

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

And Pioli had it figured out, too. That's why we went with the 27-year-old, win-now QB.

Wow, I guess you would have rather had Thigy?

We had to get Cassel when we had the chance. No one said it was the preferred time. And again with your filp-flopping. You know and even said yesterday what the Maangment says to the public is usually not what is said behind closed doors.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Wow, I guess you would have rather had Thigy?

No, I would have drafted a QB.

And I would have worked to improve the line, which Pioli should have been doing anyway. Even if he doesn't touch the line, you can sit a n00b for the entire year, if necessary.

Fish · 09-28-2009, 09:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Yea, cause passing was the answer....you're right. We had stellar pass protection.

Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish

Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

Dude, I can want to score 10 TD's every game and have the plays to do it. If I don't have the players to execute the plays then it doesn't matter.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish

Yeah... you're probably right... R2P2 all the way.... I'm glad our offensive minded coach is leading this team in the right direction for the future....

Nevermind that this same excuse didn't work for the previous coach who had the same problems....

Shhh...

Everything Herm did was wrong, but everything Haley does has a purpose.

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

No, I would have drafted a QB.

And I would have worked to improve the line, which Pioli should have been doing anyway. Even if he doesn't touch the line, you can sit a n00b for the entire year, if necessary.

Well, I guess O-Lineman-R-Us was out of the good stock.

And had we gone that route you would be crying in a year or two that we improved the line and now have a rookie QB and we should have got Cassel when we had the chance.

The_Doctor10 · 09-28-2009, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tuckdaddy

An NFL offense will not work with the O-line we have. It won't matter who we play. We can't run block or pass block. No to mention pick up a blitz.

So is that a vote for the spread? If only they hadn't fired Gailey, eh?

Fish · 09-28-2009, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Dude, I can want to score 10 TD's every game and have the plays to do it. If I don't have the players to execute the plays then it doesn't matter.

Chan didn't have the players to execute the plays last year either.... what did he do with it? And what was the response?

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Unleash_the_Phury

So is that a vote for the spread? If only they hadn't fired Gailey, eh?

I like the spread myself. I don't think any of us knows what the real deal was with Gailey. As I understand it, he wanted out way back in May or sooner and we told him no.

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

Well, I guess O-Lineman-R-Us was out of the good stock.

And had we gone that route you would be crying in a year or two that we improved the line and now have a rookie QB and we should have got Cassel when we had the chance.

.

I can promise you that I wouldn't have been "crying" about not acquiring Cassel.

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish

Chan didn't have the players to execute the plays last year either.... what did he do with it? And what was the response?

A bunch of crying that Thigy and the Pistol wasn't the answer?????

**DeezNutz** · 09-28-2009, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

A bunch of crying that Thigy and the Pistol wasn't the answer?????

And they weren't. Not long-term.

Do you disagree?

**petegz28** · 09-28-2009, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

And they weren't. Not long-term.

Do you disagree?

No. But for someone to sit here and say we should have kept Gailey because of such is stupid.

**Bearcat** · 09-28-2009, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KC Fish

R2P2 all the way

Quote:

Originally Posted by petegz28

10 TD's

I know this is crazy talk, but maybe something in between? Perhaps we shouldn't run it up the center's butt every play, but we don't have to throw a hail mary every play, either?

Surely there are plays that can get the 14 defensive players out of the box without requiring Cassel to hold onto the ball very long.

Maybe we can turn over the playcalling napkin next week and find out!

09-28-2009, 07:36 AM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-1205873	I like what Haley did yesterday... 3 yards rushing in the 1st half? No, you are going to run the **ing ball. You are not going to be allowed to drop back and watch your QB get killed because you can't run the ing ball. It is similar to making a hitter lay a bunt down with 2 strikes after he couldn't do it on strikes 1 and 2. Fatlock can cry that Haley isn't treating them like men all he wants. He needs to stick to his doublestuffs. This team isn't going to compete for a playoff spot anyway so this is exactly the time to pull stunts like this. You want to win? You have to learn how to block. You have to learn how to run the ball. 3 **ing yards in 1 half is pathetic and I don't blame Haley one bit for what he did. It isn't like we had 30 yards in the 1st half..we had 3. Three. Unacceptable, PERIOD! Dropping back to pass would have resulted in Cassel being broken into pieces. I don't know what game Fatlock and some others watched, but I saw one that showed me our O line was there in name only. Had we dropped back, which is exactly what Philly wanted, we would be cussing about the picks Cassel threw or the fact that Brokie would be the starter for the next several weeks cause of Cassel being hurt.
Posts: 132,601