Antonio Brown accused of RAPE - Federal Lawsuit Filed

[chinaski]

Per TMZ

Antonio Brown Accused of Raping Former Trainer, Lawsuit Filed via @TMZ https://t.co/khGNY803SS

— Charles Stewart (@StewartTVNews) September 11, 2019

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

He threw furniture from a ****ing building and nearly hit a young child. Are you this reeruned on purpose or what? Rape lover.

It's Rape logic.

[BryanBusby]

It's like a legion of Hootie's

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

It's like a legion of Hootie's

Yup. And we ain't talking Darius Rucker.

[Giant Octopodes]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

So, you think that a drunk driver injuring someone or killing them in a car crash isn't that bad because the driver didn't aim to actually crash?

Only a Rapetriot fan or a Raider fan could be so morally bankrupt...

When did I say it's not that bad? More like someone getting a DUI is not evidence that they're guilty of 1st degree murder later on. Negligence is not the same as malicious intent, and the act in question does not show he's the kind of person capable of raping someone.

Again the guy is far from a saint. If he had hit the kid I'd want him in jail for life, and his actions have readily shown him to be a terrible person. But I'm not the one trying to trivialize rape here, instead I seem to be the only one recognizing it for the heinous act that it is. It takes a special kind of evil to do that to another human, and negligence and petty douschebaggery are not evidence of that evil.

If he's guilty I want him in jail till his dick falls off at a minimum, I think I've been very clear on that. All I'm saying is that his previous actions are in no way evidence of his guilt because they don't display the same kind of malicious evil involved in rape. Find evidence he killed someone, or was previously accused of sexual assault, or anything which shows the same kind of evil and I'm right there with you. Throwing something out a window without looking to make sure the street is clear first is not it. Looking out the window first, seeing a kid there, then throwing something at him in an attempt to kill him would be.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

When did I say it's not that bad? More like someone getting a DUI is not evidence that they're guilty of 1st degree murder later on. Negligence is not the same as malicious intent, and the act in question does not show he's the kind of person capable of raping someone.

Again the guy is far from a saint. If he had hit the kid I'd want him in jail for life, and his actions have readily shown him to be a terrible person. But I'm not the one trying to trivialize rape here, instead I seem to be the only one recognizing it for the heinous act that it is. It takes a special kind of evil to do that to another human, and negligence and petty douschebaggery are not evidence of that evil.

If he's guilty I want him in jail till his dick falls off at a minimum, I think I've been very clear on that. All I'm saying is that his previous actions are in no way evidence of his guilt because they don't display the same kind of malicious evil involved in rape. Find evidence he killed someone, or was previously accused of sexual assault, or anything which shows the same kind of evil and I'm right there with you. Throwing something out a window without looking to make sure the street is clear first is not it. Looking out the window first, seeing a kid there, then throwing something at him in an attempt to kill him would be.

That's a lot of words to say that you condone child endangerment.

[Giant Octopodes]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

That's a lot of words to say that you condone child endangerment.

"If he had hit the kid I would want him in jail for life". Yeah, clear endorsement of child endangerment there

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

"If he had hit the kid I would want him in jail for life". Yeah, clear endorsement of child endangerment there

You don't have to hit the kid with a couch to endanger the child.

[New World Order]

The rapist plays and the rapist's supporters turn a blind eye to it.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

I love rape as long as we win the Super Bowl

Ya, we know.

[Giant Octopodes]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

You don't have to hit the kid with a couch to endanger the child.

Correct, and when did I say he was not guilty of reckless endangerment, or that reckless endangerment should not be punished, or in any way shape or form condone that behaviour?

All I said is that reckless endangerment is not the same as rape. How is that a difficult or controversial concept for you?

[BryanBusby]

Nobody is making it an equivalent you goddamn dumbass

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

Correct, and when did I say he was not guilty of reckless endangerment, or that reckless endangerment should not be punished, or in any way shape or form condone that behaviour?

All I said is that reckless endangerment is not the same as rape. How is that a difficult or controversial concept for you?

Why do think I'm comparing them?

You're the one who cimparted them, and tried to minimize them.

Rape minimizer.

[Giant Octopodes]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

Why do think I'm comparing them?

You're the one who cimparted them, and tried to minimize them.

Rape minimizer.

Oh? Please provide evidence of either being minimized. Good luck with that.

[Giant Octopodes]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Nobody is making it an equivalent you goddamn dumbass

Nah actually that's you sir, you're the one who indicated it was equivalent

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Giant Octopodes

Oh? Please provide evidence of either being minimized. Good luck with that.

Go reread what you posted.