Only TWO games since Kareem left!!

[UChieffyBugger]

Has a Chiefs running back rushed for a hundred yards in a game. Sunday's 145 by Damien was the first since his 103 at Seattle last season. Honestly I know Andy hates running the ball but that stat is utterly pathetic tbh. I think finally replacing Kareem's production is vital for this team moving forward so we can take the pressure off of Pat, give opposing defenses something else to worry about and also compete for time of possesion. We all saw how weak against the run the Pats were on Sunday and what a good running game can do...so I hope Veach has plans to land a quality RB In the offseason. Most teams have their number one back so the draft could be kind to us tbh with Taylor, Swift, Harris, Dobbins, Ettien etc all there to be had.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

SMH and just like last year this moron is still too thick to comprehend the basics.

1. WE HAD AN ELITE RB AND ANDY WAS USING HIM JUST FINE TO BALANCE OUT THE ATTACK.

2. "Three nice backs"? Er one is a Dolphins reject who has taken a step back this season, the other is an undrafted prospect who Andy doesn't trust and the third one is a washed up star who keeps fumbling the damn ball...the bottom line is OUR RB ROOM ISN'T GOOD ENOUGH, PERIOD.

3. And folks love to talk as if Hunt had somehow regressed from his rookie year WHEN THE KID HAD 4.6 YARDS PER CARRY AND WAS AT 824 YARDS IN ELEVEN GAMES BEFORE GETTING CUT!!.. So he was very likely to have better stats than his rookie year.

But really why am I even trying to convince you anyway? You've clearly got SERIOUS issues when it pertains to the value of RB's so this exchange is pretty much a waste of time. Veach enquired about Bell at the deadline and will most likely draft one...I hope you don't take it to hard when he does .

*take it too hard.

I love it when someone who doesn't have a grasp on 3rd grade English wants to call people a "moron."

[Chargem]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

SMH who says we have to "change"? DIDN'T WE HAVE HUNT IN THIS SAME OFFENSE? All I want to see is a quality RB who can run the ball effectively..WHY ARE YOU SO AGAINST THAT?

And you sound like you're out of the Andy Reid school of thinking..."we don't need a good RB..just get any old scrubs off the street and we'll throw it a million times per game" SMH

There's so much dumb in your response I don't have time to respond to all of it right now, so I just thought I would point out this massive contradiction:

Paragraph 1, you don't want the offense to change.
Paragraph 2, "the Andy Reid school of thinking is just throw it a million times a game".

So which is it? Is the offense fine under Andy Reid and doesn't need to change, or does it need to change to be more of a running offense with a featured back?

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

*take it too hard.

I love it when someone who doesn't have a grasp on 3rd grade English wants to call people a "moron."

You also "love" CRYING TO THE MODS like a baby and looking like a DAMN IDIOT when they ignore your stupid ass for the millionth time

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by Chargem

There's so much dumb in your response I don't have time to respond to all of it right now, so I just thought I would point out this massive contradiction:

Paragraph 1, you don't want the offense to change.
Paragraph 2, "the Andy Reid school of thinking is just throw it a million times a game".

So which is it? Is the offense fine under Andy Reid and doesn't need to change, or does it need to change to be more of a running offense with a featured back?

I want the offense to be what it was with Kareem dummy...that's what I'm talking about. Andy does love to throw it but when he's got a quality back it forces him to find balance. Having three scrubs in the RB room just gives him an excuse to rely on the pass too much and in turn put Pat under even more pressure.

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

He "flourished" with Cam Erving, Austin Reiter, Andrew Wylie, and Martinas Rankin?

Must have missed that.

No dunce..he flourished with Cam, fisher, ldt, mitch...FOUR of the guys who are still here you melon.

[Chris Meck]

Dude.

Kareem had ONE 100 yard game in 13 last season.

Williams has TWO since.

Your own statement in the header is dumb.

We pass at 65% ratio, 5th in the NFL. That's not enough for anyone to get 100 on a consistent basis.

We run less than 27 of 32 teams.

I'd agree we should run it a bit more than we do. Probably still wouldn't consistently get a single 100 yard rusher. Probably get a couple around 50 though.

One guy with 100 is not better than two guys with 50. It's the same. It's like if I've got 4 quarters, and I exchange it for a paper dollar at the convenience store, I'm not making a profit.

We've had serious injury issues with the offensive line, and that hampers a running game as well.

Other than Shady fumbling twice, what constant fumbles are you talking about?

Of the marquee running backs that you claim we should've drafted or traded for and paid big money, how many of them are on Super Bowl contenders? Do you think it's POSSIBLE that there's no positive correlation there?

It's highly unlikely that Veach was really trying to get Bell. He doesn't fit this blocking scheme very well, and that's all been discussed, but because you have a Madden Football video game understanding of things, you don't get it.

Andy Reid is not running the ball much because he likes to PASS. McCoy has TWO fumbles in 9 games, which isn't really that much. Bummer the timing, though. However, Shady is averaging like 5 yards per carry. So that would mean, IF Reid gave him 20 carries, he'd get 100 yards. And then you'd be happy. FEATURE BACK. So there you go.

I'll bet in this stretch down the back half of the season in which we get Mahomes and Fisher back that we WILL have some 100 plus rushing games (perhaps not from ONE guy) as we will finally play some weaker teams and need to salt the game away in the 4th quarter.

In our previous exchange in which you threw your tantrums about a feature back, you insisted that we WOULD DRAFT ONE HIGH IN THE DRAFT because it was a HUGE NEED.
I told you we wouldn't. I was right, you were wrong.

You're still the dumbest guy in the room. Must be frustrating.

[oldman]

You know, this whole argument about Hunt is silly. Like Chris said, one back that gains 100 yards is not better than 2 that gain 50. Sure enough, Hunt was a rare talent, but he's gone, never to return again. It's time to quit moaning about it and move forward.

I'll agree we need to run more, that keeps the other team's offense off the field and allows our defense a breather. We have 4 RBs on the roster, not counting Sherman. Feed them the ball 25 to 30 times a game and then unleash the wrath of PMII and his Legion of Zoom, plus Kelce.

[Hoover]

We finally have a QB that throws for 5000 yard and 50 TDs and we start to bitch about not having a 100 yard a game running back.

It's really hard to have both in my opinion, unless you are playing a AFC east teams twice a year...

[Hoover]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Dude.

Kareem had ONE 100 yard game in 13 last season.

Williams has TWO since.

Your own statement in the header is dumb.

We pass at 65% ratio, 5th in the NFL. That's not enough for anyone to get 100 on a consistent basis.

We run less than 27 of 32 teams.

I'd agree we should run it a bit more than we do. Probably still wouldn't consistently get a single 100 yard rusher. Probably get a couple around 50 though.

One guy with 100 is not better than two guys with 50. It's the same. It's like if I've got 4 quarters, and I exchange it for a paper dollar at the convenience store, I'm not making a profit.

We've had serious injury issues with the offensive line, and that hampers a running game as well.

Other than Shady fumbling twice, what constant fumbles are you talking about?

Of the marquee running backs that you claim we should've drafted or traded for and paid big money, how many of them are on Super Bowl contenders? Do you think it's POSSIBLE that there's no positive correlation there?

It's highly unlikely that Veach was really trying to get Bell. He doesn't fit this blocking scheme very well, and that's all been discussed, but because you have a Madden Football video game understanding of things, you don't get it.

Andy Reid is not running the ball much because he likes to PASS. McCoy has TWO fumbles in 9 games, which isn't really that much. Bummer the timing, though. However, Shady is averaging like 5 yards per carry. So that would mean, IF Reid gave him 20 carries, he'd get 100 yards. And then you'd be happy. FEATURE BACK. So there you go.

I'll bet in this stretch down the back half of the season in which we get Mahomes and Fisher back that we WILL have some 100 plus rushing games (perhaps not from ONE guy) as we will finally play some weaker teams and need to salt the game away in the 4th quarter.

In our previous exchange in which you threw your tantrums about a feature back, you insisted that we WOULD DRAFT ONE HIGH IN THE DRAFT because it was a HUGE NEED.
I told you we wouldn't. I was right, you were wrong.

You're still the dumbest guy in the room. Must be frustrating.

And enough said.

Winner.

Done.


Should have read this first!

[Iconic]

I am fully convinced he will be a Chief again. I just feel like it's destiny.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

No dunce..he flourished with Cam, fisher, ldt, mitch...FOUR of the guys who are still here you melon.

How many quarters has Fisher played this season.

How long has LDT been out?

You're a butt****ing idiot. Your particular brand of stupid is about as hard as woodpecker lips.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

You're still the dumbest guy in the room. Must be frustrating.

L'ilUChieffyBurger is the always the dumbest guy in every room he's in...an amazing feat, when you really think about it...

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by UChieffyBugger

You also "love" CRYING TO THE MODS like a baby and looking like a DAMN IDIOT when they ignore your stupid ass for the millionth time

I've never once "cried to the mods" about you.

Ever.

I have wondered aloud how the **** you still have thread starting privileges, but I haven't once gone to the mods about you or reported you for your dumbassery.

That's just another thing you're 100% wrong about. You make lots of assumptions that aren't based in fact.

Which is why you're so ****ing stupid, on so many levels.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by rabblerouser

L'ilUChieffyBurger is the always the dumbest guy in every room he's in...an amazing feat, when you really think about it...

Yep. That holds true even when I'm in the room - and that's SAYING SOMETHING!

[UChieffyBugger]

Originally Posted by Chris Meck

Dude.

Kareem had ONE 100 yard game in 13 last season.

Williams has TWO since.

Your own statement in the header is dumb.

We pass at 65% ratio, 5th in the NFL. That's not enough for anyone to get 100 on a consistent basis.

We run less than 27 of 32 teams.

I'd agree we should run it a bit more than we do. Probably still wouldn't consistently get a single 100 yard rusher. Probably get a couple around 50 though.

One guy with 100 is not better than two guys with 50. It's the same. It's like if I've got 4 quarters, and I exchange it for a paper dollar at the convenience store, I'm not making a profit.

We've had serious injury issues with the offensive line, and that hampers a running game as well.

Other than Shady fumbling twice, what constant fumbles are you talking about?

Of the marquee running backs that you claim we should've drafted or traded for and paid big money, how many of them are on Super Bowl contenders? Do you think it's POSSIBLE that there's no positive correlation there?

It's highly unlikely that Veach was really trying to get Bell. He doesn't fit this blocking scheme very well, and that's all been discussed, but because you have a Madden Football video game understanding of things, you don't get it.

Andy Reid is not running the ball much because he likes to PASS. McCoy has TWO fumbles in 9 games, which isn't really that much. Bummer the timing, though. However, Shady is averaging like 5 yards per carry. So that would mean, IF Reid gave him 20 carries, he'd get 100 yards. And then you'd be happy. FEATURE BACK. So there you go.

I'll bet in this stretch down the back half of the season in which we get Mahomes and Fisher back that we WILL have some 100 plus rushing games (perhaps not from ONE guy) as we will finally play some weaker teams and need to salt the game away in the 4th quarter.

In our previous exchange in which you threw your tantrums about a feature back, you insisted that we WOULD DRAFT ONE HIGH IN THE DRAFT because it was a HUGE NEED.
I told you we wouldn't. I was right, you were wrong.

You're still the dumbest guy in the room. Must be frustrating.

NONSENSE!!!

1. Kareem had seven 100 yard games, two 90 yard games and five 80 yard games in the 26 regular games he played..so he was getting 100 yards or close in the majority of games he played IN REID'S SYSTEM AND WITH MAJORITY OF THE GUYS ON THIS O-LINE

2. Even when you talk about Kareem having one 100 yard game...that's because he was busy catching the ball too and causing problems...THAT'S WHAT QUALITY BACKS DO.

3. Your weak argument about "two backs" is futile when we clearly don't have "two backs" getting 50 yards per game and even if we did Andy probably isn't giving them enough carries to each get there...he trusts ONE quality back more imo.

4. Darrel Williams also fumbled in Detriot...and that's what happens when backs can't get a groove going because Andy doesn't trust em

5. The draft totally changed after the Tyreek issue so please don't be stupid...the fact that they drafted Darwin and then signed Mccoy should tell you how much they wanted a back.

All in all I simply will not agree with those who are happy to have scrubs in the RB room and no effective running game on sunday's...the other top sides are showing us that QUALITY is needed back there and hopefully Veach learns this lesson.