*****The Hunter Nourzad Thread*****

[philfree]

Originally Posted by BWillie

Yes! I hope the goal is to let Creed walk

Why would you "want" to let Creed walk? If we have to let him go because of contract demands that's one thing but I certainly would like to keep him if we can.

[Warpaint69]

Originally Posted by philfree

Why would you "want" to let Creed walk? If we have to let him go because of contract demands that's one thing but I certainly would like to keep him if we can.

Center contracts are cheaper than the guard market currently.

[DRM08]

Originally Posted by philfree

Why would you "want" to let Creed walk? If we have to let him go because of contract demands that's one thing but I certainly would like to keep him if we can.

Wonder if they might want to move Creed to Guard. The low snaps almost cost them a Super Bowl victory.

[Chiefshrink]

Originally Posted by DRM08

Wonder if they might want to move Creed to Guard. The low snaps almost cost them a Super Bowl victory.

Could be, good point. Those low snaps bothered me all year. It gives less time for Pat to read the field in a real time fashion.

[philfree]

Originally Posted by DRM08

Wonder if they might want to move Creed to Guard. The low snaps almost cost them a Super Bowl victory.

Possible I suppose but Creed may not want to give up touching the ball every play without a fight.

[Bl00dyBizkitz]

Originally Posted by philfree

Why would you "want" to let Creed walk? If we have to let him go because of contract demands that's one thing but I certainly would like to keep him if we can.

BWillie doesn't like how expensive Creed is going to become, and doesn't believe we should pay a center big money at all because we don't heavily focus on the running game.

Take from that what you will.

[Urc Burry]

Originally Posted by Bl00dyBizkitz

BWillie doesn't like how expensive Creed is going to become, and doesn't believe we should pay a center big money at all because we don't heavily focus on the running game.

Take from that what you will.

There could be an argument that Andy values guards higher, because he’s let walk two of the better centers in the league. And has signed guys off the scrap heap to start. But even if they were the case then I would guarantee they try to lock up Trey long term.

I would still imagine they value Creed over Trey

[BWillie]

Originally Posted by philfree

Why would you "want" to let Creed walk? If we have to let him go because of contract demands that's one thing but I certainly would like to keep him if we can.

There is no reason a pass first Andy Reid offense should ever want to pay market value for a free agent elite to above avg center. It is a bad use of resources. If we played like the Eagles it not only would be a great use of resources but it would become a necessity.