Daniel Jeremiah: Many expect Chiefs to trade up for a CB

[Sassy Squatch]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

I've gone to a party at a frat house before where they looked up exactly that.

The male actor seemed to please himself with the chicken fairly easily.

To veer back to the draft. I'd rather give up more points and big plays if it meant keeping Pat upright for 17 Weeks and off IR.

Seems like building around him should be the actual priority.

This is way more interesting than the Chiefs plan in the draft. What in the actual ****?

[Bewbies]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Well ok, keep ****ing that chicken.

More like they need a starting LG worth a **** because the season will mean nothing if Witz misses a block that injures Mahomes or Fisher injures his pussy and they're stuck playing a shitty back up at LT.

Never changes, the IMMENSE importance of the guard position here on CP.

****ers like you aren't going to know what to do when you have a QB that doesn't need a perfect line to almost succeed.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by BossChief

They need to add 3 corners in this draft

2 need to have starting ability

3 is overkill, 2 is fine with one penciled in package starter IMO

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Well ok, keep ****ing that chicken.

More like they need a starting LG worth a **** because the season will mean nothing if Witz misses a block that injures Mahomes or Fisher injures his pussy and they're stuck playing a shitty back up at LT.

Its true, this isnt just another CP dumbass 'lets draft a fatty yay O line' drumbeat... everyone from you and me, to national writers knows that LG has been a black hole for freaking years

If there is a chance to lock that spot down for 10 years as one of St Pats 'Unsullied' bodyguards, you take it... Veach has already proven that he intends to load this offense, so dont be surprised about LG

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

3 is overkill, 2 is fine with one penciled in package starter IMO



Its true, this isnt just another CP dumbass 'lets draft a fatty yay O line' drumbeat... everyone from you and me, to national writers knows that LG has been a black hole for freaking years

If there is a chance to lock that spot down for 10 years as one of St Pats 'Unsullied' bodyguards, you take it... Veach has already proven that he intends to load this offense, so dont be surprised about LG

Yep.

While Mahomes will possibly make the OL look better than Alex did, no way anyone can deny they've never figured out the LG position and Witz is not the answer at all.

I don't think they gotta shift up in the draft to fill it, but hard to fill that need if they trade off half of the picks and spend it all on corners.

Moving up a but to land a starting corner and nabbing a 2nd one somewhere Day 3 is definitely realistic.

Originally Posted by BossChief

How is trading the pick we got from Marcus Peters “robbing from next year?”

When they are trading off a future choice to fall back under the standard pick count threshold, what else would you call it?

Losing the actual net gain from the Peters trade to move up for his replacement would net them a 6th for 4th swap for an All-pro corner.

That would be like pissing on an electric fence because Frank said you were a pussy and wouldn't do it. You did it and by golly did it hurt, so your solution for burning dick is to numb it up some by sticking it in the waffle iron. Sure it goes numb and the pain subsides and Frank thinks you're cool as ****, but now your dick looks like a mangled burnt breadstick.

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by BryanBusby

Yep.

While Mahomes will possibly make the OL look better than Alex did, no way anyone can deny they've never figured out the LG position and Witz is not the answer at all.

I don't think they gotta shift up in the draft to fill it, but hard to fill that need if they trade off half of the picks and spend it all on corners.

Moving up a but to land a starting corner and nabbing a 2nd one somewhere Day 3 is definitely realistic.


When they are trading off a future choice to fall back under the standard pick count threshold, what else would you call it?

Losing the actual net gain from the Peters trade to move up for his replacement would net them a 6th for 4th swap for an All-pro corner.

That would be like pissing on an electric fence because Frank said you were a pussy and wouldn't do it. You did it and by golly did it hurt, so your solution for burning dick is to numb it up some by sticking it in the waffle iron. Sure it goes numb and the pain subsides and Frank thinks you're cool as ****, but now your dick looks like a mangled burnt breadstick.

Losing Peters is a sunk cost.

If we aren’t going to have him this year using the picks we got from him to help this years team isn’t stealing from the future. It’s utilizung currency as it’s earned.

[BryanBusby]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Losing Peters is a sunk cost.

If we aren’t going to have him this year using the picks we got from him to help this years team isn’t stealing from the future. It’s utilizung currency as it’s earned.

Doubling down on stupid isn't how you build a quality, long term team.

I know we're all high on Mahomes here, but I don't feel strongly about a first year starting QB taking us to the Super Bowl just quite yet. Don't feel it's completely necessary to go aggressive in that fashion today.

They will have other things to address coming up.

Unless Dee Ford really turns it around this year and they feel good about giving him a long-term deal, they're going to have a massive hole at edge rusher going into 2019.

Morse will be a FA, so they will also need a Center if they don't elect to keep him in house. Allen Bailey will be a FA too and I can't see him getting a 3rd contract.

Next year is shaping up to be a great class for DL and edge-rushers, so I'd rather keep the high choices we have now.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by BossChief

Losing Peters is a sunk cost.

If we aren’t going to have him this year using the picks we got from him to help this years team isn’t stealing from the future. It’s utilizung currency as it’s earned.

It's also devaluing that currency though as next years second is only worth a third this year.

[BossChief]

This OL is going to look VASTLY improved.

1) Mahomes avoids pressure while keeping his eyes down field. That alone is going to be a huge difference maker in how the OL is viewed.

2) Mahomes is going to kill teams that blitz him. His release and vision are both top notch. The less teams can blitz, the easier the OLs job is.


Now, I’d definitely move up for the right guy on the OL and I agree that protecting the franchise by building a monster line in front of him is a wise investment. Especially with Morse being a FA after this year...but getting 2 starting quality corners is mandatory.

It’s gonna take teams 10-12 games to catch up to what Mahomes is doing on offense. I think he runs wild till that point. The hype machine on the kid will be in full swing.

Opposing teams are going to be throwing the ball A TON.

Let’s say we come out of the draft with Oliver AND Hughes while keeping all of our original picks next year along with a 3rd, 4th and 3 later picks this year for other positions?

Then we use the other third on a safety to play next to Berry.

Or a guard

[Mother****erJones]

First, trading Tyreek is not what Veach is thinking. Delete your profile.

Secondly, I’m all for going up for a corner but not giving up too much. Lots of holes to fill. Plus, this is the year I think we see some UDFAs make the squad and play. There’s finally room for that. Hopefully they can nail one or two of those.

Third, Veach is aggressive. But I like the idea of having a 1, 2 2s and 3 to start the draft next season with no 4th round pick due to the Ragland trade.

I’d stay at 54 if you can’t go up for a corner. We need safeties badly and EB isn’t getting younger. Need to start adding some impact safeties that are worth a ****.

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones

I’d stay at 54 if you can’t go up for a corner. We need safeties badly and EB isn’t getting younger. Need to start adding some impact safeties that are worth a ****.

That's, an answer , but to trade up and knowingly so you have to give up alot and if someone rips another for stating an opinion which involves a difficult decision you better have a solution yourself.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

That's, an answer , but to trade up and knowingly so you have to give up alot and if someone rips another for stating an opinion which involves a difficult decision you better have a solution yourself.

Just checked in to page 7, and one of the first things I see is you saying Veach might be contemplating trading Hill?

Whatever you're smoking, lay off that shit bruv...

[Tribal Warfare]

Originally Posted by Easy 6

Just checked in to page 7, and one of the first things I see is you saying Veach might be contemplating trading Hill?

Whatever you're smoking, lay off that shit bruv...

As I said it's going to cost us, the Chiefs will have to live with difficult decisions if they want trade into the 1st

[BossChief]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

As I said it's going to cost us, the Chiefs will have to live with difficult decisions if they want trade into the 1st

There’s absolutely no chance they trade Hill.

It’s silly to even suggest.

[Easy 6]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

As I said it's going to cost us, the Chiefs will have to live with difficult decisions if they want trade into the 1st

I feel like a nice guy this evening, no insults forthcoming... but there should be

[O.city]

May not be Super Bowl push in 18 per say but you wanna push in 19,20,21

Get as many of the guys you think will be in their prime during that windowhere This year if you can and let them build together