|
|
09-19-2017, 01:08 PM | Topic Starter | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $4273447
|
The most shocking headline you'll see all year.
http://deadspin.com/los-angeles-does...ers-1818503650
Los Angeles Doesn't Care About The Chargers Barry Petchesky Yesterday 9:07am Sunday saw the return of the Los Angeles Chargers, their first home game since 1960, and no one’s very excited about it. New and relocated teams usually get a first-year attendance bump, just from the novelty. The Chargers are a good team with an offense that’s fun to watch. Their temporary home, a soccer-specific stadium, is intimate and unique. There are plenty of reasons the Chargers might draw a good crowd. None of those reasons, apparently, are enough to overcome the hard realties of deep, deep disinterest:
A stadium that seats 27,000 couldn’t sell out, drawing an officially (generously) announced crowd of 25,381 for a 19-17 loss to the Dolphins. Making that attendance figure even sadder is that half of paying fans weren’t there to see the Chargers. “There were a lot of Miami fans out there,” Melvin Gordon said. “I think it was around 50-50.” Including, perhaps, the person in charge of setting off the cannon after Chargers scores. Listen for the boom as Younghoe Koo missed a 44-yarder that would’ve won the game:
You’ll also hear a lot of cheers in that video. Those are the Dolphins fans, and they confused Philip Rivers all afternoon: Quote:
Let’s be clear: None of this is an indictment of those Chargers fans that exist or of Angelenos. You’re under no obligations to go to games, and considering how much better television is than the live NFL experience, the incentives are already slim. The NFL is a business, and if people aren’t consuming a product, that’s a sign of a failure of the company to offer a product people want to consume. And, potentially, a fatal misread of the market. Could it be possible, after the NFL spent decades using Los Angeles as a threat to strong-arm cities into building stadiums to keep their teams, that Los Angeles didn’t actually want its own team, let alone two? It’s still very early, but:
|
|
Posts: 59,295
|
09-19-2017, 01:10 PM | #2 |
Kind of a mod
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Donkey Land
Casino cash: $1906899
|
I kind of hope both the Rams and Chargers fail miserably and are looking for a new home in 5 years.
|
Posts: 51,854
|
3 0 |
09-19-2017, 01:16 PM | #3 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
The Chargers should go back to San Diego immediately, if not sooner. |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
09-19-2017, 01:22 PM | #4 | |
__
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Springpatch
Casino cash: $4273447
|
Quote:
They left a city that was lukewarm about them to go to a huge market that has a history with them. Instead of begging for public funding, they're going to fork over their own money to build a stadium, and from the looks of it, it's going to be the nicest one in the league (until that Vegas one theoretically gets built). They've put a fair amount of effort into branding and messaging. And their team is pretty well coached and has the key pieces in place for a swift rebuild. The Chargers didn't even think it through. All the way down to their logo this was just corporate and mindless. LA doesn't give two shits about this team and never has, and that's going to get even worse when the Chargers ask the public for money on a stadium. They may have to pay the Rams for rent. |
|
Posts: 59,295
|
09-20-2017, 02:58 PM | #5 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $2879099
|
Quote:
Spanos: "If you don't build my new stadium, I'm going to L.A..." SD: "**** off" Spanos: "No seriously guys, I'm going to leave. I'll give you one more chance to build me a new stadium or I'm really going to go to L.A..." SD: "****. Off." Spanos:.....{sheepishly packing his suitcase}...."well fine, I'm just gonna go then. You guys are mean." {stomps out of room like jilted toddler} Everything - absolutely everything - about the SD conundrum had a really easy solution and one the NFL should've absolutely forced: Make Spanos build or sell. You don't give him his relocation. You don't let him fleece SD taxpayers. You tell him he can build his own goddamn stadium that ISN'T one of the ridiculous Jerrahdomes or Kroenke Palaces or he can sell the team to any number of arrogant billionaires that would love that feather in their cap. This was a dumb idea approved by greedy, shortsighted owners who wanted a chunk of the relocation fee and all driven by a skinflit moron who wrote a check he never had any real interest in cashing. I'm not sure quite how to turn this into a WWI analogue, but I'm sure that if given enough time you could make it happen. Somehow I'm confident that the Spanos clan would end up being Austria in the whole thing.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 60,603
|
09-20-2017, 03:08 PM | #6 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Yep and they really got screwed when Clark Hunt led the majority of the owners in choosing the Inglewood site over the Carson site that would have hosted the Raiders and Chargers.
Carson wasn't going to build a $1.6 billion dollar stadium for the Chargers and Kroenke's been planning the move to Los Angeles for more than a decade, so his presentation blew away the other owners. At that point, it was game over. |
Posts: 88,960
|
09-19-2017, 01:17 PM | #7 | |
Rock Chalk Jayhawks! KU!!!
Join Date: Aug 2005
Casino cash: $8301160
|
Quote:
The owner I fly for is seriously trying to buy an NFL franchise. Would be interesting to see if he goes after the chargers, since we're in Napa and SoCal all the time anyway. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Posts: 934
|
09-19-2017, 01:23 PM | #8 |
MVP
Join Date: Apr 2001
Casino cash: $10008447
|
I think they'll probably be fine in another twenty years or so.
__________________
AND SOMETIMES IT'S NOT SO EASY ESPECIALLY WHEN YOUR ONLY FRIEND TALKS SEES LOOKS AND FEELS LIKE YOU AND YOU DO JUST THE SAME AS HIM -Jiimi Hendrix |
Posts: 5,995
|
09-19-2017, 01:26 PM | #9 | |
Rufus Dawes Jr.
Join Date: Aug 2000
Casino cash: $1538179
|
Quote:
Hell the real problem in San Diago is that the owner not only wants a stadium, but a shopping complex attached. It's stupid. There are plenty of people in this world who would love to own an NFL team. Go find one and make SD work. |
|
Posts: 17,374
|
09-19-2017, 01:45 PM | #10 |
Rabbi Goldmann
Join Date: Nov 2012
Casino cash: $5450159
|
|
Posts: 87,025
|
09-21-2017, 06:55 AM | #11 |
Supporter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ozarks
Casino cash: $3160564
|
|
Posts: 33,452
|
09-21-2017, 10:21 AM | #12 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
People will flock to the stadium, just for the experience and if the Rams happen to be good, they'll get plenty of support. The Chargers? |
|
Posts: 88,960
|
09-21-2017, 10:30 AM | #13 | |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Jul 2009
Casino cash: $2624064
|
Quote:
The chargers just never made sense. I kind of agree with DJ that Canada makes sense |
|
Posts: 81,336
|
09-21-2017, 10:48 AM | #14 |
Needs more middle fingers
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego
Casino cash: $4184563
|
Toronto makes sense for the Bills. Chargers not so much unless they completely re-brand.
__________________
Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever. |
Posts: 64,419
|
09-21-2017, 11:32 AM | #15 | |
Beyond the Rapids
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Langley, VA
Casino cash: $-370000
|
Quote:
Are people going to battle their way across LA through traffic and everything else, to pay prices to attend games that will surely be above Jerry's World prices, because there's a campus around it which hosts the NFL network? And this will need to support two teams? I mean, call me crazy I suppose, but it seems like franchises are powered by fans who feel loyalty to a football team and support it through thick and thin. Not because the team is good but because it's a passion. Are people going to be passionate about the "gameday experience"? Are they going to keep coming back over and over to pay (exorbitant prices) at the great bars and restaurants in the stadium? Does the League think the fan base has infinite resources and will pay for anything they put out? Any add on, any upsell or upcharge? Do they think rank and file fans care about uber-luxury experiences or do they just want to see good football at a price they think is fair? I don't think history is going to bear this out. I don't think amenities drive attendance, football does. I don't think "gameday experience' means anything when the team is terrible or when the city has no attachment to it. I don't think fans cheer for owners like Spanos or Kroenke who regard the fan base with contempt. I don't think these teams are going to have an easy time building attachment from football fans in the city, many of whom already have a team. Maybe I am wrong - maybe just being in LA is enough to keep a team profitable. Maybe they will suck enough corporate dollars out of the city and sell enough suits and advertising that the gate receipts won't matter that much. You watch LA Kings games on TV and unless the team is near the top of the conference, the lower level looks about 2/3 full. Who knows. I just don't buy into the idea that this "district" is going to drive attendance, especially for two teams, because the football fans that keep franchises going don't want to go to Disneyland. They just want to watch football. |
|
Posts: 80,659
|
|
|