Chiefs Why are we still using the 3-4? - Page 3

Aspengc8 · 08-29-2011, 07:46 AM

IMO we have decent personnel to run a 4-3 or any even front scheme.

DE: gilberry/Hali/Bailey
DT: dorsey/gregg/powe
MLB: dj/belcher/williams
OLB: houston/miller/sheffield

DJ can be played at OLB in a even scheme, since he is one of the better coverage LB's I have seen to date. Problem is our LB's dont have much size for a 3-4 scheme, and out of our 3 DL, none require a double team. I think gilberry/hali on the ends would let us rush the passer with 4, and use our more mobile LB's in coverage. Dorsey back to a 3 tech DT, with gregg/powe helps vs interior runs too. Most teams that dominate odd fronts have beastly DL, and linebackers that look like they lift weights. Our LB's look like they go to planet fitness.

Just a thought.

Will try in Madden 12 tonight, to verify lol.

Rasputin · 08-29-2011, 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PGM

Cocaine is a hell of a drug.

**penguinz** · 08-29-2011, 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AutumnWind

Think of the 4-3 you guys could of had if you kept Allen.

Jared Allen is too busy liying about walking up on 3 mountain lions sunbathing on a rock.

Omaha · 08-29-2011, 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Laz

it comes from typing like you talk

In the heartland you say 'could of' or even 'coulda'

I type could of instead of could have all the time

but carry on making fun of the faider troll.

I think "could've" is what you're really saying.

Mr. Laz · 08-29-2011, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Omaha

I think "could've" is what you're really saying.

Kate Moss is fat.

veist · 08-29-2011, 04:43 PM

In addition to everything else that has been mentioned the strength of the 3-4 is you can be creative with how you generate pressure and who you put into coverage. Its certainly nice to have the flexibility to be even more creative with personnel groupings by having those 4-3 sub packages while the base defense being a creative 3-4 front. Bottom line: We have a guy that is creative with his defensive scheming and knows his shit in the 3-4 why marginalize him by switching to a 4-3 base?

**Easy 6** · 08-29-2011, 04:51 PM

Because it works & its more versatile than a 4-3?

ModSocks · 08-29-2011, 04:51 PM

I agree. We should move to the 4-6-1

08-29-2011, 07:46 AM
Aspengc8 Veteran Join Date: Dec 2005 Casino cash: $9950632	Why are we still using the 3-4? IMO we have decent personnel to run a 4-3 or any even front scheme. DE: gilberry/Hali/Bailey DT: dorsey/gregg/powe MLB: dj/belcher/williams OLB: houston/miller/sheffield DJ can be played at OLB in a even scheme, since he is one of the better coverage LB's I have seen to date. Problem is our LB's dont have much size for a 3-4 scheme, and out of our 3 DL, none require a double team. I think gilberry/hali on the ends would let us rush the passer with 4, and use our more mobile LB's in coverage. Dorsey back to a 3 tech DT, with gregg/powe helps vs interior runs too. Most teams that dominate odd fronts have beastly DL, and linebackers that look like they lift weights. Our LB's look like they go to planet fitness. Just a thought. Will try in Madden 12 tonight, to verify lol.
Posts: 2,816

08-29-2011, 04:43 PM	#35
veist Veteran Join Date: Oct 2006 Casino cash: $10004900	In addition to everything else that has been mentioned the strength of the 3-4 is you can be creative with how you generate pressure and who you put into coverage. Its certainly nice to have the flexibility to be even more creative with personnel groupings by having those 4-3 sub packages while the base defense being a creative 3-4 front. Bottom line: We have a guy that is creative with his defensive scheming and knows his shit in the 3-4 why marginalize him by switching to a 4-3 base?
Posts: 1,324

08-29-2011, 04:51 PM	#36
Easy 6 pie is never free Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: the drivers seat Casino cash: $3497775	Because it works & its more versatile than a 4-3?
Posts: 91,921

08-29-2011, 04:51 PM	#37
ModSocks Needs more middle fingers Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: San Diego Casino cash: $4094563	I agree. We should move to the 4-6-1 __________________ Life is like a dick. Sometimes it gets hard for no reason, but it can't stay hard forever.
Posts: 64,521