Chiefs Chiefs hire Daboll - Page 69

Urc Burry · 02-03-2012, 11:32 PM

Per Adam Schefter twitter

Coogs · 02-07-2012, 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

From what I see around here, people absolutely care about the tree.

Not the fans. And I think maybe Crennel knows this, otherwise he wouldn't have mentioned it in that fashion.

Messier · 02-07-2012, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs

Not the fans. And I think maybe Crennel knows this, otherwise he wouldn't have mentioned it in that fashion.

Wait, I'm confused, are you saying Crennel senses people don't want someone else from the NE tree and that's why he said that, because I'm saying the same thing.

Fritz88 · 02-07-2012, 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC

New Chiefs coach promises to 'attack' on offense

http://www.wtop.com/?nid=351&sid=2738036

KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) - Kansas City's fifth offensive coordinator in four years is hoping to lend some much-needed permanence to his new team.

Brian Daboll said Monday that he considers stability to be very important.

"You look at teams, for the most part percentage-wise that have been successful over the years, one word I think is sometimes overlooked is continuity," Daboll said Monday at his introductory news conference with the Chiefs. "When you can have a system in play and you understand that your players are going to be in that system and they understand their roles, that gives you a little bit of a jump start.

The 36-year-old Daboll will replace the retired Bill Muir. He was offensive coordinator last year at Miami and ran the offense at Cleveland the two years before that.

Since Scott Pioli took over as general manager after the 2008 season, offensive coordinator in Kansas City has been one of the most insecure positions in the NFL. Chan Gailey was fired a few days before the 2009 season began and replaced by Todd Haley, who spent his first year as a head coach also running the offense.

Charlie Weis held the job the next season, resigned and was replaced for one year by Muir.

"So we've got some work to do here installing our stuff and I look forward to it," Daboll said.

Like Pioli and head coach Romeo Crennel, Daboll's career roots are deep in the New England system, where he was a young assistant from 2000-2005.

"I think a lot of people say he's another guy from the New England tree," Crennel said. "But it's been a while since he's been in Mew England, and I just happen to be from that New England tree also. Sometimes knowing people and knowing what they're about is important. In this case, that was important to me. Plus, I know he's a good person and a very hard worker."

Daboll inherits an offense that was devastated by injuries last year, losing Pro Bowl running back Jamaal Charles after only 12 carries and tight end Tony Moeaki in the preseason. A hand injury shelved quarterback Matt Cassel for much of the second half of a season that ended with a 7-9 mark and Haley's dismissal.

Daboll promised an aggressive approach.

"The first word I want to use is `attack,'" he said. "When you're an offensive football coach, you want to try to really set precedent on the defense and attack the defense."

Daboll's best NFL offense so far has ranked 22nd in the league. Since Crennel plans to be defensive coordinator as well as head coach, Daboll will have more autonomy than most offensive coordinators in the NFL.

"You know what, to a degree he will because I'm going to depend on him to handle the offensive side of the ball," Crennel said. "But that being said, because of our relationship, we're going to be able to sit down and say, `This is how we need to attack an opponent, this is what we need to do in a game plan,' and then expect Brian to implement those things."

Daboll shrugged off reports that he was hard to get along with and feuded with quarterback Colt McCoy while in Cleveland.

"With most of the players that I've coached, I have a very good relationship," he said. "Colt and I have a good relationship. It's not a bad relationship. I think there's certain times when you're a coach and sometimes emotion can get to you. Maybe you step back and say, `Boy, I would rather have handled it that way rather than this way. But I think the job as a coach is to tell the players what to do and show them how to do it and really not accept any excuses. It's an emotional game."

He added: "I'm a high-energy, up-tempo guy. I expect perfection. I know that's not possible all the time but I think we need to all hold ourselves to a high standard, to really setting the tone and expecting the highest detail and highest execution from ourselves."

(Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)

We are going to attack?

Wtf are you supposed to do dipshit?

jd1020 · 02-07-2012, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fritz88

We are going to attack?

Wtf are you supposed to do dipshit?

Run a McCluster draw over and over and over and over and over.

Coogs · 02-07-2012, 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

Wait, I'm confused, are you saying Crennel senses people don't want someone else from the NE tree and that's why he said that, because I'm saying the same thing.

I think we are on the same page.

el borracho · 02-07-2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

Who do the Chiefs target...realistically?

Mallet.

el borracho · 02-07-2012, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RustShack

I love that everyone is so mad Cassel is still the QB. Who have we passed on that has turned out better than him so far? We haven't had a chance to grab an elite QB. They are rare for a reason.

Mallet.

Coogs · 02-07-2012, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho

Mallet.

Mallett was inactive for all 16 games this season. And he had one good preseason game. The others just so - so.

And I was for drafting Mallett last season too. But the jury is still out on him.

el borracho · 02-07-2012, 08:02 PM

Mallet set records during his college career; Cassel didn't even start.

Who would you prefer on the roster right now?

Mr_Tomahawk · 02-07-2012, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho

Mallet set records during his college career; Cassel didn't even start.

Who would you prefer on the roster right now?

I wanted Mallet in the draft too. But if we passed on him multiple times in the draft, what makes you think Pioli would give up multiple picks (likely) to get him from the Pats?

Coogs · 02-07-2012, 08:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho

Mallet set records during his college career; Cassel didn't even start.

Who would you prefer on the roster right now?

Again, I was for drafting Mallett in the 1st last year. I like/liked him too. But the jury is still out... just like on Stanzi. Stanzi looked like our best QB in the preseason too, but the jury is still out on him as well.

el borracho · 02-07-2012, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

I wanted Mallet in the draft too. But if we passed on him multiple times in the draft, what makes you think Pioli would give up multiple picks (likely) to get him from the Pats?

I don't think Pioli would make a trade for Mallet. He should, but probably won't. I'm simply responding to the question of "who is potentially available?"

el borracho · 02-07-2012, 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coogs

Again, I was for drafting Mallett in the 1st last year. I like/liked him too. But the jury is still out... just like on Stanzi. Stanzi looked like our best QB in the preseason too, but the jury is still out on him as well.

The jury is out on Luck and Griffin and whoever the hot names will be one year from now, too. The jury is in, however, when it comes to Matt Cassel- he sucks.

In my opinion, retaining Matt Cassel provides no real benefit and only delays the arrival of a legit QB. If I were GM, I would drop Cassel immediately and start trying to identify a legit prospect. And if I were unable to find one this year, I would go with Stanzi and try again next year. If Stanzi tears it up- great! Problem solved. If Stanzi stinks it up- great! We know he's not the answer and our crappy record will likely have us in position to draft the next Andrew Luck. Either way, we would be farther along than we are with Cassel.

Coogs · 02-07-2012, 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by el borracho

The jury is out on Luck and Griffin and whoever the hot names will be one year from now, too. The jury is in, however, when it comes to Matt Cassel- he sucks.

In my opinion, retaining Matt Cassel provides no real benefit and only delays the arrival of a legit QB. If I were GM, I would drop Cassel immediately and start trying to identify a legit prospect. And if I were unable to find one this year, I would go with Stanzi and try again next year. If Stanzi tears it up- great! Problem solved. If Stanzi stinks it up- great! We know he's not the answer and our crappy record will likely have us in position to draft the next Andrew Luck. Either way, we would be farther along than we are with Cassel.

Your preaching to the choir man!

O.city · 02-07-2012, 08:17 PM

The front office sees Matt Cassel as a hard working, smart guy that happens to play quarterback.

That's basically got to be your reasoning for keeping the guy. If it's on a talent level, he is lacking there.

Hell lets just take Vince YOung and turn the offense wild. We sure can attack.

02-03-2012, 11:32 PM
Urc Burry Veteran Join Date: Jan 2011 Casino cash: $9031048	Chiefs hire Daboll Per Adam Schefter twitter
Posts: 2,453

02-07-2012, 08:02 PM	#1029
el borracho In Pat We Trust Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Albuquerque, NM Casino cash: $6389148	Mallet set records during his college career; Cassel didn't even start. Who would you prefer on the roster right now?
Posts: 11,825

02-07-2012, 08:17 PM	#1035
O.city In Search of a Life Join Date: Jul 2009 Casino cash: $2754064	The front office sees Matt Cassel as a hard working, smart guy that happens to play quarterback. That's basically got to be your reasoning for keeping the guy. If it's on a talent level, he is lacking there. Hell lets just take Vince YOung and turn the offense wild. We sure can attack.
Posts: 81,242